Mo cheeks and Loyer
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Mo cheeks and Loyer
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,289
- And1: 531
- Joined: Jun 18, 2008
Mo cheeks and Loyer
Was they really that bad as coaches?
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 800
- And1: 132
- Joined: Mar 21, 2009
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
aad wrote:Was they really that bad as coaches?
I think you forgot the green font.
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
- dVs33
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 10,186
- And1: 1,874
- Joined: Apr 20, 2010
- Location: Melbourne, Oz
-
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
Is this real??
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,563
- And1: 593
- Joined: Nov 19, 2012
-
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
Can you at least say "Were?"
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
- TurboTitan
- Starter
- Posts: 2,188
- And1: 1,940
- Joined: Jul 12, 2013
- Location: Windsor, ON
-
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
I feel like this is a troll... not sure why
“We don't see ourselves as All-Stars. We see ourselves as one unit. It's like five fingers on a hand. You can do more damage together as a fist than spread out flat.” ~SHEED
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,753
- And1: 22,818
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
They were terrible 

Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
- engelbert321
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,396
- And1: 1,463
- Joined: Jul 24, 2011
-
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
Preseason isn't an indication of anything they say, we are gonna be fine they say.
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,465
- And1: 2,323
- Joined: Apr 01, 2013
-
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
aad wrote:Was they really that bad as coaches?
Were they really that bad as coaches?
Answer- Yes, hell yes. They were complete morons that lacked the skills to coach at even an almost average level.
I understand Cheeks inherited a flawed roster, but he wouldn't even try to shuffle the dysfunctional front line despite the terrible returns. Loyer was even more of a bumbling fool.
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,850
- And1: 6,818
- Joined: Jun 22, 2013
- Location: Michigan
-
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
The first game after Cheek's was fired everyone was like Yeah!!! Loyer The Destroyer!!! This is how the pistons play when they have an actual coach!!! Lets sign Loyer to an extension!! Then every game the rest of the season everyone was like "who is this Loyer Bum why didn't we just sign Lionel Hollins!" And now everyone is like Phewww good thing we didn't sign Hollins, now we have the best coach since Larry Brown, Ron Jeremy!!!
Detroit vs Everybody
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
- Blkbrd671
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,862
- And1: 4,819
- Joined: Oct 05, 2010
- Location: Guam,USA
-
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
DETermination wrote:The first game after Cheek's was fired everyone was like Yeah!!! Loyer The Destroyer!!! This is how the pistons play when they have an actual coach!!! Lets sign Loyer to an extension!! Then every game the rest of the season everyone was like "who is this Loyer Bum why didn't we just sign Lionel Hollins!" And now everyone is like Phewww good thing we didn't sign Hollins, now we have the best coach since Larry Brown, Ron Jeremy!!!
This has to be at least 99% accurate
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
- Pharaoh
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,443
- And1: 4,742
- Joined: Aug 10, 2001
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
DETermination wrote:The first game after Cheek's was fired everyone was like Yeah!!! Loyer The Destroyer!!! This is how the pistons play when they have an actual coach!!! Lets sign Loyer to an extension!! Then every game the rest of the season everyone was like "who is this Loyer Bum why didn't we just sign Lionel Hollins!" And now everyone is like Phewww good thing we didn't sign Hollins, now we have the best coach since Larry Brown, Ron Jeremy!!!
Because most people have never played on a legit basketball team with an actual coach.
In order to have success in any field you need to have some kind of structure. Some kind of plan that you can turn to regardless of what else is happening and not only execute but trust that by doing so you'll fight through whatever obstacle is in front of you.
Cheeks had no system or structure as far as I could see, especially on D. We didn't communicate well, didn't know how to defend the PnR...epic fustercluck on D IMO.
Loyer inherited that and didn't change anything.
You can blame the players as much as you like but it's the coach's job to put players in a position to excel. Cheeks and Loyer failed to do that.
Cheeks was gifted Drummond, Monroe and Smith - a trio that SVG has stated is potentially the best PF/C trio in the East. Cheeks misused them until he was fired. Loyer misused them from there.
Those 3 guys might not guarantee a playoff spot but geez, we're not that far away considering the rest of the East
Sent from my GT-I9300 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
- ElectricMayhem
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,242
- And1: 11,452
- Joined: Jul 01, 2006
- Location: Kobe-Osaka
-
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
aad wrote:Was they really that bad as coaches?
Let's just say they were on the same level as the grammar used in your question.
Tom Gores' Securus faced a class action lawsuit in 2024. The company engaged in a "quid pro quo kickback scheme" with county jails in Michigan which banned in-person visits in order to maximize revenue from voice and video calls.
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
- ElectricMayhem
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,242
- And1: 11,452
- Joined: Jul 01, 2006
- Location: Kobe-Osaka
-
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
DETermination wrote:The first game after Cheek's was fired everyone was like Yeah!!! Loyer The Destroyer!!! This is how the pistons play when they have an actual coach!!! Lets sign Loyer to an extension!! Then every game the rest of the season everyone was like "who is this Loyer Bum why didn't we just sign Lionel Hollins!" And now everyone is like Phewww good thing we didn't sign Hollins, now we have the best coach since Larry Brown, Ron Jeremy!!!
I thought the tongue-in-cheekness of Loyer the Destroyer was apparent.
Tom Gores' Securus faced a class action lawsuit in 2024. The company engaged in a "quid pro quo kickback scheme" with county jails in Michigan which banned in-person visits in order to maximize revenue from voice and video calls.
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,699
- And1: 1,386
- Joined: Jan 30, 2014
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
I don't think Cheeks was that bad. He had Jennings playing well and Cheeks had us top 8 in the East for a while. I disagreed how he played Monroe. I think our owner killed our teams hope when he allowed Loyer to coach. That guy Loyer was terrible.
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
- BadMofoPimp
- RealGM
- Posts: 48,988
- And1: 12,477
- Joined: Oct 12, 2003
- Location: In the Paint
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
They really good assistant coaches, but not good at being head coaches.

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,700
- And1: 1,420
- Joined: Jan 19, 2002
-
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
Neptune wrote:I don't think Cheeks was that bad. He had Jennings playing well and Cheeks had us top 8 in the East for a while. I disagreed how he played Monroe. I think our owner killed our teams hope when he allowed Loyer to coach. That guy Loyer was terrible.
Yes! Cheeks isn't a coach you'd take over SVG, but the team was going better under him than Loyer. I didn't like the KCP benching even if he was struggling with his shot. The perimeter D was so bad otherwise last year that he still was more a plus than a minus. If this was Gores just having a tantrum, it certainly didn't help the team. If the plan was to save the draft pick, it's an object lesson on why planning based on a lottery is poor planning. Sadly, the Pistons have been a miracle of bad planning of late. Hope SVG can turn things around.

Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 51,009
- And1: 18,118
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
ElectricMayhem wrote:aad wrote:Was they really that bad as coaches?
Let's just say they were on the same level as the grammar used in your question.
He capitalized and punctuated this time.
He's improving.
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,555
- And1: 786
- Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
aad wrote:Was they really that bad as coaches?

Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
- Uncle Mxy
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,521
- And1: 2,259
- Joined: Jul 14, 2004
- Location: I plead the Fifth Dimension
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
Rasheed should've been made head coach instead of Loyer.
THAT, at least, would've been interesting.
THAT, at least, would've been interesting.
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,746
- And1: 398
- Joined: Jun 12, 2007
- Location: Grand Rapids
-
Re: Mo cheeks and Loyer
JD43320 wrote:aad wrote:Was they really that bad as coaches?
This gave me a solid 5 minute gut laugh. Thank you.