RealGM Top 100 List #26

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,828
And1: 25,127
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#61 » by E-Balla » Thu Sep 4, 2014 11:16 pm

Notanoob wrote:
Quotatious wrote:
Narigo wrote:My candidates are Drexler, Pierce, Pippen, Frazier, Baylor, Kidd, Stockton and Barry

Very tough to decide.

Vote for the Truth man. :D

Seriously though, I'm pretty shocked to see his name being mentioned so early. I would think he'll start getting traction around #35, but to mention him as a possible top 30 candidate is IMO too high.
I like Pierce, but even top 40 sounds high to me. I mean, I know he's got a great reputation as a postseason performer, but he's a scoring SF at heart-his passing, defense and rebounding aren't that special at his position. What really separates him from other volume scoring SFs, like Hondo, Barry, Nique, or one of the 80's post-up guys like King or Dantley?

Longevity, scoring efficiency, postseason performance. Either way I don't think he's top 30 at all and top 35 might be a bit of a stretch but if Scottie is being discussed he should be too.
Basketballefan
Banned User
Posts: 2,170
And1: 583
Joined: Oct 14, 2013

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#62 » by Basketballefan » Fri Sep 5, 2014 12:28 am

Chuck Texas wrote:
Basketballefan wrote:What is your argument for rodman over dwight? Dwight grabs just as many rebounds with probably better defense while being a much better scorer. Im not sure i see the argument.


By any metric Rodman is clearly a superior rebounder so I'm not sure where that is coming from.

Don't really see a need to get into Rodman here tho as he's not worthy of this spot. I know I rank him higher than most and am pretty okay with it.

They are both averaging 13 rpg over their careers...but i will concede Rodman is the better rebounder yes but it's not by some enormous margin was the point i was trying to make.

But even with his edge in rebounding, Dwight has been a top 5 player in the league for multiple seasons, Rodman has never been anywhere close to that level. Dwight has led his teams to multiple deep playoff runs. As i said i do not see the argument.

I'm not going to go any further into this because as you said neither are worthy candidates, but i seen you put Rodman over Howard so i had to interject.
Basketballefan
Banned User
Posts: 2,170
And1: 583
Joined: Oct 14, 2013

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#63 » by Basketballefan » Fri Sep 5, 2014 12:39 am

GC Pantalones wrote:
Notanoob wrote:
Quotatious wrote:Vote for the Truth man. :D

Seriously though, I'm pretty shocked to see his name being mentioned so early. I would think he'll start getting traction around #35, but to mention him as a possible top 30 candidate is IMO too high.
I like Pierce, but even top 40 sounds high to me. I mean, I know he's got a great reputation as a postseason performer, but he's a scoring SF at heart-his passing, defense and rebounding aren't that special at his position. What really separates him from other volume scoring SFs, like Hondo, Barry, Nique, or one of the 80's post-up guys like King or Dantley?

Longevity, scoring efficiency, postseason performance. Either way I don't think he's top 30 at all and top 35 might be a bit of a stretch but if Scottie is being discussed he should be too.

It will be ridiculous for Pierce to be mentioned this high.

Yeah his longevity is good but what is so special about Pierce in the playoffs?

Pierce career stats in the playoffs 20 6 4 55 ts%..what is so special about that? And before Garnett and Allen came he only had one deep playoff run.

Pierce 04 playoffs: 21 ppg 46 ts%? Where is pierce getting this reputation as some ultra efficient scorer?

Pierce started falling off after that 08 title run...he was supposed to be still in his prime in 09 and only manages 21 6 3 in the playoffs with Garnett out. He gets a little overrated around here. To me he's a top 45, borderline top 40 if he's lucky. He should not be at all be mentioned with Hondo, Barry or Pippen.
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,245
And1: 26,124
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#64 » by Clyde Frazier » Fri Sep 5, 2014 12:44 am

Basketballefan wrote:
Chuck Texas wrote:
Basketballefan wrote:What is your argument for rodman over dwight? Dwight grabs just as many rebounds with probably better defense while being a much better scorer. Im not sure i see the argument.


By any metric Rodman is clearly a superior rebounder so I'm not sure where that is coming from.

Don't really see a need to get into Rodman here tho as he's not worthy of this spot. I know I rank him higher than most and am pretty okay with it.

They are both averaging 13 rpg over their careers...but i will concede Rodman is the better rebounder yes but it's not by some enormous margin was the point i was trying to make.

But even with his edge in rebounding, Dwight has been a top 5 player in the league for multiple seasons, Rodman has never been anywhere close to that level. Dwight has led his teams to multiple deep playoff runs. As i said i do not see the argument.

I'm not going to go any further into this because as you said neither are worthy candidates, but i seen you put Rodman over Howard so i had to interject.


Just a comment on their rebounding specifically as I was curious now that we have per 100 #s available:

Rodman 92-98
16.7 RPG (5.8 ORPG, 11 DRPG)
24.2 RPG per 100 (8.3 ORPG per 100, 15.9 DRPG per 100)
26% TRB, 18.1% ORB, 33.8% DRB

Dwight 07-13
13.5 RPG (3.6 ORPG, 9.8 DRPG)
19.2 RPG per 100 (5.2 ORPG per 100, 14 DRPG per 100)
21.3% TRB, 11.8% ORB, 30.3% DRB

So yeah, rodman was kinda good at rebounding...
colts18
Head Coach
Posts: 7,434
And1: 3,255
Joined: Jun 29, 2009

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#65 » by colts18 » Fri Sep 5, 2014 12:59 am

Comparison between Kidd, Payton, and Stockton in RAPM from 97-03:

97 (offense, defense, total):
Stockton (19th overall): 2.34 1.54 3.88
Payton (21st): 2.7 1.1 3.8
Kidd (65th): 2.85 -1.09 1.76

98:
Stockton (7th): 3.28 2.04 5.32
Payton (20th): 3.65 0.79 4.44
Kidd (56th): 2.37 0.13 2.5

99:
Stockton (11th): 2.88 2.27 5.14
Kidd (24th): 2.88 2.27 5.14
Payton (29th): 3.74 -0.19 3.55

00:
Payton (6th): 5.45 0.81 6.26
Stockton (7th): 3.11 3.06 6.18
Kidd (26th): 3.17 0.54 3.71

01:
Stockton (3rd): 3.1 2.5 5.6
Kidd (132nd): -1.4 1.4 0
Payton (159th): 0.5 -0.7 -0.3

02:
Kidd (17th): 2.8 0.2 3
Stockton (18th): 1.3 1.6 3
Payton (105th): 1.1 -0.6 0.5

03:
Kidd (28th): 1.3 1.3 2.6
Stockton (69th): 1.2 0 1.2
Payton (142nd): 1.1 -1.2 0

Numbers per 36 minutes:
Stockton: 15-10-3, 2.9 TOV, .607 TS%, 22 PER, .211 WS/48
Payton: 20-8-4, 2.4 TOV, .528 TS%, 22 PER, .176 WS/48
Kidd: 14-9-6, 3.1 TOV, .507 TS%, 19 PER, .150 WS/48


Stockton and Payton look like they are better than Kidd during this span.
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,861
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#66 » by drza » Fri Sep 5, 2014 1:07 am

Scottie Pippen

I may vote for Pippen here. I may have voted for him before, to be honest. At the very least I think he should be getting more discussion. Here is something I wrote about him in the 2011 top 100:

drza wrote:
There is a general basketball truism that big men can have a big defensive impact that the box scores can't catch, and that point guards can have a big offensive impact that the box scores might miss. We've discussed these types of effects with players like Russell, Walton (RPoY project), Garnett, Magic, Robertson and Nash and were able to demonstrate them quantitatively in some way. I feel like Scottie Pippen, though he played small forward, legitimately had both a point guard effect on offense and a big-man-defender effect on defense. Now, that impact may have been a bit watered down compared to All-time greats like the ones that I mentioned, but still, the point is that I think he qualifies for BOTH of those impacts that aren't easily captured by the boxes. Then, he compounded that by playing in the generation before +/- stats came available and only missing more than 10 games in a season one time before he turned 35. As such, it is very difficult to get a quantitative handle on his impact.

That said, though, just because I can't easily quantify his impact doesn't mean that it wasn't there. I might not be able to put an exact number on his defensive prowess, for example, but from watching him I was quite confident that he was probably the best wing defender that I've ever seen. And that he had a huge help-defense impact, which isn't generally associated with a wing defender. And that he was also an excellent rebounder for his position. Then, when I note some qualitative trends...such as that the Bulls were a top-7 defense every season between 1993 and 1996 (7th, 6th, 2nd, 1st) and the only player to start on all 4 of those teams was Pippen. To me, I have no issue giving Pippen a huge non-boxscore defensive boost when compared to someone like Drexler. That it's not just a case of judging them on their offense and then adding a bit to Pippen's ledger, but that on a fundamental level Pippen's defense gives him a big impact advantage at that end of the court despite the fact that Drexler wasn't a bad defender himself.

Then, on offense, it isn't as clear. During that same '93 - 96 stretch, the Bulls' offense ranked 2nd (w/ Jordan), 14th (no Jordan), 10th (no Jordan until end), and 1st (w/ Jordan). So, unlike on defense, on offense the Bulls clearly suffered without MJ. But on the other hand...is that really damning to Pippen as an elite offensive player? That stretch proves the no-duh assertion that MJ had a monster impact on the Bulls' offense. But that doesn't, of itself, mean that Pippen didn't. And when I look at the offensive players still on the Bulls during '94 and '95...BJ Armstrong was purely a shooter, Ho Grant a garbageman, Purdue/Cartright lesser garbagemen, and Harper (at that stage of his career)/Meyers were just defensive role players. Kukoc was a reasonable shot creator for a 6th man, but nothing special. For the most part, then, this was an offense where Pippen was for all intents and purposes the only shot creator for both himself and his teammates and also the leading scorer. The fact that he led that offense to above-average offensive ratings is of itself an accomplishment and testament to the fact that he was a very strong offensive player.


ETA let's make it official: vote Scottie Pippen
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
DQuinn1575
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,952
And1: 712
Joined: Feb 20, 2014

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#67 » by DQuinn1575 » Fri Sep 5, 2014 3:20 am

I'm voting for Kevin Durant


He's been the number 2 player in the league behind LeBron, with 3 2nd and a first MVP finish.

He's lost 4 of the 5 years to champions led by all-time greats

He has the highest peak (other than Walton) of anyone left.

The longevity of Frazier, and Cowens, who are probably my highest guys, aren't that much greater for top quality seasons.

Stockton obviously has longevity, but I feel he is a lifetime achievement type - he will get voted in before he appears on my list, as I value peak a little more than the average voter here.


I feel there are a lot of guys whose careers have valid points. If I do a Top 100 list in the future, this is a spot that can change
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,861
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#68 » by drza » Fri Sep 5, 2014 5:59 am

Chuck Texas wrote:I know I'm likely really alone here(tho drza stepped up on Kidd as well so maybe not) but Deke for me is the best big man on the board. I think we are still a couple spots too early with guys like Stockton, Pippen, Hondo, Kidd for sure deserving to be higher, but if we are talking about dominant defensive centers than Deke needs mention.

Elite shot-blocker.
Elite rebounder.
Elite defensive anchor

Was never a great scorer, but played well within his limits and 57% TS for his career. Came in and had huge impact as a rookie, led the Nuggets to one of the biggest upsets in playoff history over the Sonics, and was a huge part of that Finals teams in Philadelphia where he proved to be the missing piece and had a tremendous playoffs. And yeah peak Shaq put up big numbers in the Finals against him, but Deke was no slouch himself.


Dikembe Mutombo on the radar?

I could support Deke being mentioned in this company. Someone asked a few posts back about whether Ben Wallace should start getting mentioned around the same time as Nash, and I pointed out that Mutombo was actually the closest that we'd seen to a defensive version of Nash (e.g. all defense, dominant defense) in the databall era. Nash just went in, so I think mentioning Mutombo is fair game. Just to put a few numbers to some of your qualitative descriptions above:

Mutombo has the 6th highest career rebound percentage (both total reb % and defensive reb %) in NBA history and the 5th highest career block percentage (stats not kept during Wilt/Russell times).

The 1991 Nuggets were dead last (27th/27) in the NBA in team defensive rating and 16th in team defensive rebound percentage, the year before Mutombo arrived. The 1992 Nuggets featuring rookie Mutombo jumped up to 13th in team defensive rating and 9th in team defensive rebound percentage. In '93 they were up to 8th in team DRTG and 9th in team defensive rebound percentage, and by '94 they were up to #5 in team DRTG and #6 in team defensive rebound percentage.

1994
Let's spend a bit of time on '94. The Nuggets won 42 games and made the playoffs (they were a 20-win team in '91 and steadily built over Deke's first 3 years until they finally reached the postseason). Mutombo led the NBA in blocked shots and was third in total rebounds.

Thanks to the good work done by fpiii, El Gee and Colts18, we now have on/off +/- data for the 1994 season, as well as some rough estimates of what the RAPM might look like. Mutombo was fifth in the NBA in on/off +/- in '94 with a +14.3. Three of the top four players ahead of Mutombo in the '94 on/off rankings have already been voted in (David Robinson at +19.9, Karl Malone at +17.4, and Hakeem Olajuwon at +14.5). For posterity, Shaq was 28th with a +7.7 score, Stockton was 33rd at +7.3, Pippen was 36th at +7.0, and Barkley was 37th at +6.8.

Then, in the playoffs, Mutombo led his 8th seeded Nuggets past the #1 seed, 63-win Sonics that featured Payton, Kepm and Schrempf. Those Nuggets had very little in the way of team offense...Mutombo was actually third on the team in playoffs scoring at 13.3 ppg, and no one on the team averaged even 15 ppg that postseason (Laphonso Ellis led them with 14.8 ppg, with Reggie Williams second at 14.3 ppg). No, that team won entirely on the strength of its defense with Mutombo leading the way. Mutombo averaged 13.3 points, 12 boards, and a whopping 5.8 blocks per game in that improbable postseaosn run that saw the Nuggets not only upset the Sonics, but to also push the Malone/Stockton Jazz (who had just finished demolishing D-Rob's Spurs) to 7 games in the 2nd round.

Databall era

We (currently) don't have full RAPM stats available until 1998. All of the above happened before '98. Also, Mutombo won two Defensive Player of the Year awards in 1995 and 1997, and even got a vote for MVP in '97 before the (current) databall era began.

However, from 1998 through the present, Mutombo still had the highest defensive RAPM scores on record over the period featuring his 30s and 40s (it should be pointed out that Mutombo came into the league as a 27-year ole rookie, and played until he was 42). Using Doc MJ's normalized PI RAPM dataset, Mutombo's top three years (corresponding to 1998 - 2000) averaged a defensive RAPM score of +8.7. As a comparison, only three offensive players had three years of offensive RAPM that high: Nash (+9.6), LeBron (+9.3) and Wade (+8.7). So according to RAPM, Mutombo's defensive impact from ages 31 - 34 essentially matched the 3-year offensive peaks of the three most impactful offensive players of the last 15 years. And considering that this cuts off Mutombo's actual peak, and what we saw from the 1994 on/off data, it is very likely that Mutombo actually may have even better defensive RAPM scores that we just don't know about yet.

And for those giving any weight to the postseason on/off +/- scores that I've been posting for the more modern players that we've been ranking, Mutombo does very well there as well. If I add him to the career and best stretch playoff on/off +/- tables I've posted previously, we see:

Playoff on/off +/- career (starting in 2001), sorted by difference b/w post and reg season

Code: Select all

Player   Team   Years   Reg On/off   PO On/off   Change
Kidd     Tot   01 - 13     6.3          10.2      +3.9   
Deke     Tot   01 - 09     4.0           7.9      +3.9
Kobe     LAL   01 - 14     6.7           8.3      +1.6
Shaq     Tot   01 - 11     7.7           8.6      +0.9
Duncan   SAS   01 - 14     8.3           8.9      +0.6
Nash     Tol   01 - 14     7.5           4.8      -2.7
Paul     Tot   06 - 14     9.0           6.2      -2.8
LeBron   Tot   04 - 14     11.2          8.1      -3.1
Wade     Mia   04 - 14     7.8           3.7      -4.1
Dirk     Dal   01 - 14     11.1          1.8      -9.3     


And here, again, is a similar chart for these same players when focused on their best years. The following table will track important multi-year periods in these players careers...e.g. the Lakers years for Shaq, the "dynasty" years when Duncan's Spurs won the majority of their titles, the pre-LeBron years for Wade, the Cleveland years for LeBron, the Jersey years for Kidd, the post-Shaq years for Kobe, the Suns years for Nash and the post-Nash years for DIrk: We'll only use the Philly years for Deke, though he also shows up remarkably well in this stat in his Houston years into his 40s.

Playoff on/off +/- zoomed (starting in 2001), sorted by difference b/w post and reg season

Code: Select all

Player   Team   Years   Reg On/off   PO On/off   Change
Paul     NOK   06 - 11     8.7           13.9      +5.2
Shaq     LAL   01 - 04     12.6          16.3      +3.7
Deke     Phi   01 - 02     6.8           10.4      +3.6
Wade     p-L   04 - 10     8.4           11.3      +2.9
Duncan   DYN   01 - 07     11.5          13.0      +1.5
LeBron   Cle   06 - 10     11.2          12.3      +1.1
Kidd     NJ    02 - 08     10.1          10.2      +0.1   
Kobe     P-S   05 - 12     7.2            6.2      -1.0
Nash     PHO   05 - 12     10.8           6.6      -4.2
Dirk     P-N   05 - 12     11             6.3      -4.7     


As you can see, Mutombo slots in near the top on both lists. He had strong postseason on/off +/- scores, and a healthy improvement from regular season to postseason. Just the opposite, in fact, of Nash who's playoff on/off scores weren't quite as strong as you'd expect and were down from the regular season. Might this be another anecdotal piece of evidence to argue that defensive impact could translate as well or better than some offensive impacts, perhaps due to defenses in general cranking it up in the postseason? It'll be interesting to continue to track this as I add more names to the list, to see if this is a trend or just an anomaly.

Conclusions

Wow. This is a case where I really learned some things about a player by looking into him further. I already knew how impressive Mutombo was in the RAPM studies, but upon review his entire career looks much stronger than I expected. He was clearly one of the bigger impact players of his generation, despite the fact that the majority of his impact came on defense. He had some major postseason successes...he carried those 8 seeded Nuggets over the Sonics and almost past the Jazz in '94. He had a major impact in Philly's 2001 postseason run. He was even looking great in the playoffs as a role player for the Rockets in his 40s. The more I look at it, the more Mutombo seems like a very viable option in the very near future.
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
batmana
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 1,425
Joined: Feb 18, 2009
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#69 » by batmana » Fri Sep 5, 2014 6:01 am

I missed the last vote and only voted in the runoff but this gave me more time to rank the next few guys on my list. So for the 26th spot my vote goes to Walt Frazier.

Frazier didn't have Stockton's longevity and wasn't the traditional facilitator averaging 10+ assists but he was a tremendous 2-way PG, a fierce defender and a guy who could take over, and whose game elevated at the highest stage.

Another Frazier advantage is his peak during which he won 2 titles (had a case for Finals MVP in both). Under 70s rules big men were always the most important players so if you bring portability, I believe Frazier would have done better in a game without hand-checking, with illegal 3 on D, and with the amount of fouls called on penetrations.

I was seriously considering Durant, Pippen and Bill Walton and will probably bring them up in the next few threads. It's just that when I compare them to Frazier, his resume stands out the most (Durant of course still has a long way to go).
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,803
And1: 22,717
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#70 » by Doctor MJ » Fri Sep 5, 2014 6:15 am

DQuinn1575 wrote:Ewing, who I'm not no means a fan of personally, was much much better in receiving the ball in the post over Gilmore.
And I'm a lifelong Chicagoan who hates about 95% of things New York.

NBA - Usage/TS%

Ewing 28.0/55.3
Mourning 25.6/58.3
Howard 23.4/57.9
Gilmore 19.7/64.3


He's 7-2 playing the low post, and but can't get him the ball enough to dominate. It's hard for me to take a not of first option guy as the #30 player of all-time.

Team had no success in Chicago. was good role player in SA.


It's interesting to me you posting the TS% numbers, because when I see the whole set of data there, the the clear stand out number is Gilmore's efficiency.

As I talked about with Ewing and others before, it's pretty common to see volume scoring bigs have their net offensive impact degrade down to nothing if their efficiency isn't great. If I knew nothing but those stats above for centers and was asked to guess who was helping his team the most, I'd guess the high efficiency guy.

For the record, on the topic of upcoming bigs:

I'm more impressed with Zo's prime than any of the other bigs on the horizon (not including Walton in that group), but the longevity is an issue. We're talking about a guy who played less than 20K minutes before health ended his prime. It's a big deal.

I saw others champion Mutombo, and I'm more tempted there, but minutes are telling on him too. Not that his minutes are crazy low, but if you're like me you might think Mutombo had great longevity because he seemed to play, and play effectively, forever. Mutombo played 36K minutes, and 10 total years of 2K minutes or more.

For comparison Gilmore played 47K minutes and 15 years of 2K ore more.

So altogether now:

Gilmore had the better peak by the estimation of most
And he had a longer duration as a big minute player, continuing to play in a way signaling likely impact
And overall he just played a lot more racking up a lot o' numbers.

So yeah, at least among these guys, Gilmore's definitely the next pick.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
colts18
Head Coach
Posts: 7,434
And1: 3,255
Joined: Jun 29, 2009

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#71 » by colts18 » Fri Sep 5, 2014 6:30 am

drza wrote:

1994
Thanks to the good work done by fpiii, El Gee and Colts18, we now have on/off +/- data for the 1994 season, as well as some rough estimates of what the RAPM might look like. Mutombo was fifth in the NBA in on/off +/- in '94 with a +14.3. Three of the top four players ahead of Mutombo in the '94 on/off rankings have already been voted in (David Robinson at +19.9, Karl Malone at +17.4, and Hakeem Olajuwon at +14.5). For posterity, Shaq was 28th with a +7.7 score, Stockton was 33rd at +7.3, Pippen was 36th at +7.0, and Barkley was 37th at +6.8.

Based on my regressed RAPM, Mutombo would be projected to have a 3.64 RAPM in 1994. From 97-00, 132% of Mutombo's RAPM came from defense (That also means he lost value on offense). If he had the same ratio in 94 that he had in 97-00, that would give him a +4.82 defensive RAPM in 1994 and -1.18 RAPM on offense. To put the +4.82 defensive RAPM into perspective, that would be good enough for 1st place in 2014. KG finished 1st at +4.55 (no one else finished above +4).
User avatar
Ryoga Hibiki
RealGM
Posts: 12,647
And1: 7,800
Joined: Nov 14, 2001
Location: Warszawa now, but from Northern Italy

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#72 » by Ryoga Hibiki » Fri Sep 5, 2014 8:13 am

On Mutombo I do have an issue with his offense, actually. I always had the feeling he was occupying space in the post, demanding the ball a bit too much and stopping it taking too much time to read what to do next. What do the data sat about it? How does he compare offensively with the other big men?
Слава Украине!
User avatar
SactoKingsFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,236
And1: 2,760
Joined: Mar 15, 2014
       

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#73 » by SactoKingsFan » Fri Sep 5, 2014 9:17 am

Ryoga Hibiki wrote:On Mutombo I do have an issue with his offense, actually. I always had the feeling he was occupying space in the post, demanding the ball a bit too much and stopping it taking too much time to read what to do next. What do the data sat about it? How does he compare offensively with the other big men?


The data says Mutombo had negative offensive impact but his defense more than made up for his offensive deficiencies. DRAPM suggests Mutombo might be the most impactful defender of the the last 20-25 years.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,527
And1: 10,013
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#74 » by penbeast0 » Fri Sep 5, 2014 1:29 pm

DQuinn1575 wrote:
Quotatious wrote:
DQuinn1575 wrote:I think this board overrates Gilmore greatly. He was limited offensively has he had poor hands - wasn't a good person to feed in post and couldn't run an offense around him.

Isn't it like you can criticize players like Ewing, Mourning or Howard for the same thing? All of them were mechanical, but very effective. Gilmore was still good enough as a scorer to average more than 20 PPG six times during his career (twice in the NBA) on great efficiency, +55% FG and 60% TS, and averaged almost 19 PPG on over 62% TS for his career, and didn't even decline that much in the playoffs. In the early 80s, as a 30+ year old player, he was putting up historically great scoring seasons, in terms of efficiency, 65% FG and 65-70% TS...And it's not like he was scoring in single digits - he was still averaging about 18 PPG at that point in his career. A lot like Wilt, when he accepted a more limited offensive role on the Lakers (actually Gilmore scored more on similar efficiency, than Lakers Wilt).

His numbers declined when he entered the NBA, but for example the same can be said about Dr. J. Gilmore was still an excellent defender and rebounder in the NBA, even if not as good as he was in the ABA.

Another thing - he had a very long career, in fact played like an All-Star (or superstar, in the ABA) for 15 seasons (played 48 in 1979-80 and 64 in 1983-84, but other than that, basically never missed any games, and averaged 37.4 minutes per game during between 1972 and 1986, averaging 20 points and 13 rebounds). That has to count for something.

He was a bad passer, and turned the ball over a ton. Also wasn't necessarily a good fit as your first option, but finished at rim extremely well.

I don't see how he's overrated, actually I'd argue the opposite.


Ewing, who I'm not no means a fan of personally, was much much better in receiving the ball in the post over Gilmore.
And I'm a lifelong Chicagoan who hates about 95% of things New York.

NBA - Usage/TS%

Ewing 28.0/55.3
Mourning 25.6/58.3
Howard 23.4/57.9
Gilmore 19.7/64.3


He's 7-2 playing the low post, and but can't get him the ball enough to dominate. It's hard for me to take a not of first option guy as the #30 player of all-time.

Team had no success in Chicago. was good role player in SA.


When Hubie Brown changed the focus of Kentucky's offense from a balanced offense with Dan Issel as the main scorer to focusing heavily on getting the ball to Artis Gilmore, the team improved and won the ABA title. In Chicago, there were several good scorers who didn't share all that well . . . Woolridge, Theus, etc. . . . Jordan complained about his teammates being selfish when he first got there and got some of them traded; Artis was too self-effacing to complain (one of his issues) and his coach apparently didn't see the need to focus on getting the ball in to the most efficient scorer in the NBA (go figure).
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,527
And1: 10,013
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#75 » by penbeast0 » Fri Sep 5, 2014 3:23 pm

magicmerl wrote:
ChiTown6rings wrote:
magicmerl wrote:It's weird how players get brought up too early, but then at their 'proper' place, there's voter fatigue. I suspect something like that happened to Hakeem too.



What do u mean with the Hakeem Olajuwon example?

Some posters made a strong push for him at about the #4 slot, and when he didn't get in then, just spammed the same (long) posts in every thread until he got in.

For me it got so my eyes just glazed over every Hakeem post I saw.


I'm starting to feel like that advocating Walt Frazier :o
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,769
And1: 99,314
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#76 » by Texas Chuck » Fri Sep 5, 2014 3:41 pm

I've been supporting Hondo for several threads now and am still leaning his way, but the Stockton stuff has been very compelling and I could be talked into him here. I also love Scottie Pippen and think this is right around his area, and yes, Penbeast, Mr Frazier. I had him above Stockton going into this project, but in looking much closer at him during the Nash comparisons my view of John has only elevated.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
DQuinn1575
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,952
And1: 712
Joined: Feb 20, 2014

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#77 » by DQuinn1575 » Fri Sep 5, 2014 3:45 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
When Hubie Brown changed the focus of Kentucky's offense from a balanced offense with Dan Issel as the main scorer to focusing heavily on getting the ball to Artis Gilmore, the team improved and won the ABA title. In Chicago, there were several good scorers who didn't share all that well . . . Woolridge, Theus, etc. . . . Jordan complained about his teammates being selfish when he first got there and got some of them traded; Artis was too self-effacing to complain (one of his issues) and his coach apparently didn't see the need to focus on getting the ball in to the most efficient scorer in the NBA (go figure).



Gilmore couldn't catch the ball - worst TO rate among quality bigs.
http://bkref.com/tiny/fqvYA

Note Howard had about 50% more blocks and Mutombo twice as many - and are 2nd and 4th in total rebound % of this group versus Artis being middle of this tough pack. So it's hard to call him a defensive superstar. Bulls defense in 78 and 79 went south after good end of season run in 77.

75 ABA - with Issel on his team the opposing centers in the playoffs were Tom Owens - Maurice Lucas (as center) and Darnell Hillman - 3 power forwards. - He really had no competition at center in ABA. Zelmo Beaty went from .156 WS/48 to .264 WS/48 after jumping - a decent NBA center who was superstar in ABA.

Besides guys like Cowens, Reed, and McAdoo, I also think Gervin, the star of the team when he was somewhat successful, rates much higher than Gilmore.
DQuinn1575
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,952
And1: 712
Joined: Feb 20, 2014

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#78 » by DQuinn1575 » Fri Sep 5, 2014 3:47 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
magicmerl wrote:
ChiTown6rings wrote:

What do u mean with the Hakeem Olajuwon example?

Some posters made a strong push for him at about the #4 slot, and when he didn't get in then, just spammed the same (long) posts in every thread until he got in.

For me it got so my eyes just glazed over every Hakeem post I saw.


I'm starting to feel like that advocating Walt Frazier :o


I'm thinking I may be that away with Durant. - There are a lot of guys who get support after the Top 20 -
User avatar
Quotatious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,999
And1: 11,145
Joined: Nov 15, 2013

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#79 » by Quotatious » Fri Sep 5, 2014 4:06 pm

penbeast0 wrote:I'm starting to feel like that advocating Walt Frazier :o

As one of those "spammers" who advocated for Hakeem to be as high as #4, repeating the same arguments for about 5 or 6 consecutive threads, I don't think there's anything wrong with that - everyone can have their own methodology and criteria. Honestly, I don't think that Olajuwon at 4 or Frazier in the early 20s is too high - I'm totally fine with that, and here at 26, Frazier seems like a very good candidate (BTW - I'm still not convinced why I shouldn't rank Hakeem in the top 5, the arguments made against him weren't particularly enlightening, to be honest). Actually it's cool that both you and Chuck feel so confident about voting for certain guys (Frazier for you, Havlicek for Chuck).

Notanoob wrote:I like Pierce, but even top 40 sounds high to me. I mean, I know he's got a great reputation as a postseason performer, but he's a scoring SF at heart-his passing, defense and rebounding aren't that special at his position. What really separates him from other volume scoring SFs, like Hondo, Barry, Nique, or one of the 80's post-up guys like King or Dantley?

I had Pierce at 39 on my pre-list (he was ranked 38th in the 2011 project), so I guess it's definitely reasonable, and I try my best to rank him fairly (as my favorite player), but I'm fine with him being ranked anywhere in the top 50 - lower than top 50 would be too low, but I think there are many players with great peaks/primes (quite a few better than Pierce, in this regard), but clearly worse longevity than him (McHale, Dwight, Zo, T-Mac, Durant, CP3, KJ, Walton, even Grant Hill or Bernard King, and probably a few others, as well). I know that you're one of those people, and I totally respect it (honestly, if we ranked players based on just their peak, or top 5 consecutive seasons, Paul probably wouldn't even be in the top 50 - off the top of my head, I'd say he'd be around 55), but his longevity as an All-Star caliber player is pretty considerable (almost 14 seasons with 18+ PPG, 19+ PER, 33+ MPG, about 40000 total minutes), so for those who value longevity quite a bit (I do, as well), it's a pretty good argument to rank him around 40.

As far as the players you mentioned, I have both Hondo and Barry in my top 35, and I think they're both better/greater than Pierce, rather clearly (although not by a big margin), but if I understand you last sentence correctly, you rank Nique somewhere close to Hondo and Barry, rather than the 80s post-up guys like King or Dantley (it's really ironic, because Wilkins was obviously in his prime during the 80s, and he was one of King's and Dantley's peers, among SF during that decade), and I'd definitely rather rank Wilkins with King/Dantley, than Hondo/Barry. I'd rank Pierce over Dominique (clearly better defender and playmaker, better shooter and more efficient scorer - Nique barely scored at league average TS% during the 80s). As far as that group of high scoring SFs of the 80s (Wilkins, Aguirre, Dantley, English, King, Marques Johnson, even Worthy), English is the #1 player for me, Dominique probably wouldn't even be in my top 3, among these players. He's generally considered the third best SF of the 80s after Bird and Erving, but I think he's pretty overrated, and doesn't really separate himself from his peers (the guys that I've just mentioned) in any way, other than longevity (he has the best longevity of all, only English comes close in this regard.


BTW - as far as Artis Gilmore, it'd be interesting to see what Baller2014 (presumably the guy formerly known as GilmoreFan) would have to say about him...Well, he won't, since he was banned. Bad timing, I guess? :lol:
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,527
And1: 10,013
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #26 

Post#80 » by penbeast0 » Fri Sep 5, 2014 4:25 pm

you can read him in the last project on Gilmore I think (unless he got himself banned before that).
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.

Return to Player Comparisons