Is Brett Favre the greatest Quarterback of all time?

Footballfan933 · Post #1 » by **Footballfan933** » Tue Sep 2, 2014 9:31 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3z625khAak

I think "Steven" is an idiot for saying so

VooDoo7 · Post #2 » by **VooDoo7** » Tue Sep 2, 2014 11:44 pm

Hell no. Not even close.

Higga · Post #3 » by **Higga** » Thu Sep 4, 2014 2:37 pm

In a few years time he won't even be in the top 2 for all time best Packers QB.

Post #4 » by **Worm Guts** » Thu Sep 4, 2014 3:04 pm

Higga wrote:In a few years time he won't even be in the top 2 for all time best Packers QB.

Big believer in Scott Tolzien?

LAKESHOW · Post #5 » by **LAKESHOW** » Thu Sep 4, 2014 6:41 pm

SHEEEEIIIIITT, he cant even hold Mark Sanchez' Jock Strap!

NaturalBuns · Post #6 » by **NaturalBuns** » Thu Sep 4, 2014 8:59 pm

Higga wrote:In a few years time he won't even be in the top 2 for all time best Packers QB.

I wouldn't go that far.
Rodgers has to play at a elite levels for years to sniff farve IMO.
But farve is not the best all time...

Post #7 » by **Worm Guts** » Thu Sep 4, 2014 11:19 pm

Rodgers is already the best Packers QB, but Favre is 2nd.

Lexluthor · Post #8 » by **Lexluthor** » Fri Sep 5, 2014 5:40 am

I would pick Kurt Warner over him . He lead his to more superbowl"s

Higga · Post #9 » by **Higga** » Fri Sep 5, 2014 5:45 pm

NaturalBuns wrote:
Higga wrote:In a few years time he won't even be in the top 2 for all time best Packers QB.

I wouldn't go that far.
Rodgers has to play at a elite levels for years to sniff farve IMO.
But farve is not the best all time...

I think Rodgers will be elite for a while. He's still fairly young and the Pack organization do a great job of drafting and developing talent around him. He's already matched Favre in the Super Bowls won category and he won't come close to the interceptions record.

NaturalBuns · Post #10 » by **NaturalBuns** » Sat Sep 6, 2014 2:32 am

Higga wrote:
NaturalBuns wrote:
Higga wrote:In a few years time he won't even be in the top 2 for all time best Packers QB.

I wouldn't go that far.
Rodgers has to play at a elite levels for years to sniff farve IMO.
But farve is not the best all time...

I think Rodgers will be elite for a while. He's still fairly young and the Pack organization do a great job of drafting and developing talent around him. He's already matched Favre in the Super Bowls won category and he won't come close to the interceptions record.

He probably won't come close to the TD record either.
Idk he's young but he has to stay healthy.

He hasn't achieved anything farve hasn't to already crown Rodgers 1st is premature.

Farve 1x champ
3x MVP
Most passing TDs all time
Most INTs all time. (Lol)

But like I said Rodgers has to prove it for another decade

Post #11 » by **bwgood77** » Sat Sep 6, 2014 2:42 am

Lexluthor wrote:I would pick Kurt Warner over him . He lead his to more superbowl"s

He's also passed for more yards in Super Bowls than any other QB. It's not his fault they lost two of them.

El Turco · Post #12 » by **El Turco** » Sat Sep 6, 2014 7:34 am

rodgers easily better than favre, longevity stats be damned

truth18 · Post #13 » by **truth18** » Sat Sep 6, 2014 9:01 pm

1. Brady

2. Montana

3. Manning/idk

Farve isn't even in my top ten.

No-Man · Post #14 » by **No-Man** » Sun Sep 7, 2014 1:23 am

truth18 wrote:1. Brady

Greatness · Post #15 » by **Greatness** » Sun Sep 7, 2014 2:27 pm

Peyton Manning is the greatest QB of all time imo

RIPskaterdude · Post #16 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Sun Sep 7, 2014 4:16 pm

truth18 wrote:1. Brady

2. Montana

3. Manning/idk

Farve isn't even in my top ten.

nice

therealbig3 · Post #17 » by **therealbig3** » Sun Sep 7, 2014 8:26 pm

Fischella wrote:
truth18 wrote:1. Brady

He'd probably be my pick too.

He's got about as good of an argument as anyone else.

Impossible to really "prove" who the GOAT is though.

Celtsfan1980 · Post #18 » by **Celtsfan1980** » Sun Sep 7, 2014 9:41 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
Lexluthor wrote:I would pick Kurt Warner over him . He lead his to more superbowl"s

He's also passed for more yards in Super Bowls than any other QB. It's not his fault they lost two of them.

Most "great" quarterbacks are chokers. Warner isn't one.

Post #19 » by **bwgood77** » Mon Sep 8, 2014 1:09 am

Celtsfan1980 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Lexluthor wrote:I would pick Kurt Warner over him . He lead his to more superbowl"s

He's also passed for more yards in Super Bowls than any other QB. It's not his fault they lost two of them.

Most "great" quarterbacks are chokers. Warner isn't one.

No, he always played his best on the biggest stage.

therealbig3 · Post #20 » by **therealbig3** » Mon Sep 8, 2014 1:25 am

Celtsfan1980 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Lexluthor wrote:I would pick Kurt Warner over him . He lead his to more superbowl"s

He's also passed for more yards in Super Bowls than any other QB. It's not his fault they lost two of them.

Most "great" quarterbacks are chokers. Warner isn't one.

This doesn't make sense. You can't be a great QB if you're a choker.

None of the super elite QBs have ever been chokers, they just happened to be human and had failures like anyone else.