baubo wrote:SF88 wrote:Why are fans of other teams posting stuff like "Oh Rich Paul hosed the Suns" etc?
How hard is it to realize that Bledsoe wanted $16M/yr and the Suns wanted $12M/yr so they met in the middle at $14M/yr?
The perception throughout this process has been that the Suns hold all the cards and Bledsoe none. If I were to talk with my prospective employer where I desperately want the job and they have other options, then the salary likely is closer to what they will offer than what I want.
The resulting contract, even objectively speaking, made it feel like it's a fair negotiation, where both sides have just as much leverage on the other party. While this may have been reality in terms of each side's leverage, it was definitely not the perception to the public. That Rich Paul can negotiate even a fair value for his client implies that (A)he's not incompetent and (B) the Suns apparently were a lot certain of their negotiating advantage than they appeared.
Teams also want to have happy players. Even with the negotiating advantage, if you think that player is actually WORTH more, you will pay more. Just because you can put the screws to someone in a negotiation, does not mean that you should. I think this is a clear case of that. It sends a message to other players. "Listen, we could have really pushed it, but we like Eric, so we took care of him. We will take care of you too."