Lind traded to Brewers for Marco Estrada
Moderator: JaysRule15
Lind traded to Brewers for Marco Estrada
-
- Junior
- Posts: 419
- And1: 121
- Joined: Jul 19, 2009
Re: Lind to Brewers
- BigLeagueChew
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,041
- And1: 4,088
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Location: Catcher
-
Re: Lind to Brewers
Guessing its for a bullpen arm. Overbay is probably going to retire so Lind platoon's with Reynolds at first base.
Re: Lind to Brewers
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,434
- And1: 17,967
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: Lind to Brewers
BigLeagueChew wrote:Guessing its for a bullpen arm. Overbay is probably going to retire so Lind platoon's with Reynolds at first base.
Probably. Hopefully not (I loathe trading things of value for bullpen arms), but probably.

**** your asterisk.
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,540
- And1: 2,203
- Joined: Nov 18, 2010
-
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
Marco Estrada?
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,434
- And1: 17,967
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
Things that would be appetizing in a trade for Adam Lind: Scooter Gennett, Jimmy Nelson.
Things that the Brewers wouldn't trade for Adam Lind: Scooter Gennett, Jimmy Nelson.
Things that the Brewers wouldn't trade for Adam Lind: Scooter Gennett, Jimmy Nelson.

**** your asterisk.
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,434
- And1: 17,967
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
Okay, Estrada does some things well, but he's an extreme flyball pitcher who is thus massively homer prone. He's also going to be paid a fair bit, given that he's second-year arb eligible. This is baffling.

**** your asterisk.
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,689
- And1: 27,271
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
Tyrone Slothrop wrote:Marco Estrada?
Major problems giving up homers. Fastball/changeup guy. Better reliever than starter, though he could fill in as a starter if needed. Was a non-tender candidate with us.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Lind to Brewers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,094
- And1: 3,626
- Joined: Mar 19, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Lind to Brewers
haha nothing like adding the pitcher who got shelled for more jacks than any other pitcher in baseball in 2014 to your HR happy joke of a ballpark, should work out well
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.
Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,540
- And1: 2,203
- Joined: Nov 18, 2010
-
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
Schadenfreude wrote:Okay, Estrada does some things well, but he's an extreme flyball pitcher who is thus massively homer prone. He's also going to be paid a fair bit, given that he's second-year arb eligible. This is baffling.
Blue Jays have zero need for another fringe starter/mediocre bullpen arm. There better be another move coming.
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,434
- And1: 17,967
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
He did have better luck limiting homers as a reliever, but that was a small sample size. Also, he'll get $4m+ in arb, which is a healthy chunk of coin for a guy who might be fairly solid in relief and, as mentioned above, was a candidate to get non-tendered.

**** your asterisk.
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
- BigLeagueChew
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,041
- And1: 4,088
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Location: Catcher
-
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
Schadenfreude wrote:Okay, Estrada does some things well, but he's an extreme flyball pitcher who is thus massively homer prone. He's also going to be paid a fair bit, given that he's second-year arb eligible. This is baffling.
Am also seeing a declining k rate.

yeah AA is dumping salary.
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
- zong
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,289
- And1: 102
- Joined: Sep 27, 2007
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
We just love trading with the Brewers don't we?
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,434
- And1: 17,967
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
BigLeagueChew wrote:Schadenfreude wrote:Okay, Estrada does some things well, but he's an extreme flyball pitcher who is thus massively homer prone. He's also going to be paid a fair bit, given that he's second-year arb eligible. This is baffling.
Am also seeing a declining k rate.![]()
yeah AA is dumping salary.
If he's dumping salary, he's doing it badly. Estrada won't be cheap for what he provides. Looks more like he was salivating over that K/BB and failed to notice that he's the Mexican John Wasdin.

**** your asterisk.
Re: Lind traded to Brewers for Marco Estrada
- Rhettmatic
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 21,081
- And1: 14,547
- Joined: Jul 23, 2006
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Lind traded to Brewers for Marco Estrada
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,434
- And1: 17,967
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: Lind traded to Brewers for Marco Estrada
The nicest thing I can say about Estrada is that, in the right park, he could be a well-above-average starting pitcher.
The problem is that said park would be one in, I dunno, not the AL East.
The problem is that said park would be one in, I dunno, not the AL East.

**** your asterisk.
Re: Lind traded to Brewers for Marco Estrada
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,056
- And1: 21,165
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Lind traded to Brewers for Marco Estrada
On its face, it's probably one of the worse trades of the AA era. Hard to justify it from a value/team-building perspective as Estrada is nothing more than a Villanueva type starter/reliever and Lind is one of the better bats against RHP in the league (although obviously one with limited value because he can't hit lefties and can't play the field). Cost saving is no doubt a part of this.
It looks like the Jays might end up running cheap platoons all over the field next season (Smoak/Valencia at DH, Dirks/Mayberry in LF, Gose/Pillar in CF?). It's not a bad idea in theory, but it's hard to see how those specific combinations are going to get them where they want to go in 2015.
It looks like the Jays might end up running cheap platoons all over the field next season (Smoak/Valencia at DH, Dirks/Mayberry in LF, Gose/Pillar in CF?). It's not a bad idea in theory, but it's hard to see how those specific combinations are going to get them where they want to go in 2015.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Lind traded to Brewers for Marco Estrada
- torontoaces04
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,365
- And1: 518
- Joined: Jun 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Lind traded to Brewers for Marco Estrada
Uggh....
Deck Estrada.
Deck Estrada.
Re: Lind traded to Brewers for Marco Estrada
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,440
- And1: 2,139
- Joined: Feb 25, 2004
Re: Lind traded to Brewers for Marco Estrada
I don't get this move. The Jays would have been better off not picking up Lind's option and spending Estrada's expected arbitration figure on a better free agent reliever. Estrada will probably be in the Carlos Villanueva role, and that's not worth trading one of the best hitters on the team just for a $3M savings. I would have been fine with even a late-inning relief candidate with 2-3 years of control. This is really bad.
If he's dumping salary, he is doing a bad job, and if he feel this is Lind's value, then he's also doing a bad job. There's no real positive spin here. Bashing the front office or doing something the front office deems embarrassing has now cost the Jays Lind and Escobar for practically nothing. Being run by corporate owners is probably the worst thing in sports.
If he's dumping salary, he is doing a bad job, and if he feel this is Lind's value, then he's also doing a bad job. There's no real positive spin here. Bashing the front office or doing something the front office deems embarrassing has now cost the Jays Lind and Escobar for practically nothing. Being run by corporate owners is probably the worst thing in sports.
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,377
- And1: 2,882
- Joined: Apr 23, 2012
- Location: Toronto, ON
Re: Lind to Brewers trade close
Schadenfreude wrote:He did have better luck limiting homers as a reliever, but that was a small sample size. Also, he'll get $4m+ in arb, which is a healthy chunk of coin for a guy who might be fairly solid in relief and, as mentioned above, was a candidate to get non-tendered.
I absolutely agree. I am really puzzled by this move. Every year i am puzzled by this team in the off-season. Maybe another move is coming, but on the surface Lind for Estrada is a clear win for the Brewers. I would have just kept Lind for 7.5 M. This is not even a good salary dump. A bad trade by AA. I have been a big critic of AA, and this move will add to the criticism.
Re: Lind traded to Brewers for Marco Estrada
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,434
- And1: 17,967
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: Lind traded to Brewers for Marco Estrada
Randle McMurphy wrote:On its face, it's probably one of the worse trades of the AA era. Hard to justify it from a value/team-building perspective as Estrada is nothing more than a Villanueva type starter/reliever and Lind is one of the better bats against RHP in the league (although obviously one with limited value because he can't hit lefties and can't play the field). Cost saving is no doubt a part of this.
It looks like the Jays might end up running cheap platoons all over the field next season (Smoak/Valencia at DH, Dirks/Mayberry in LF, Gose/Pillar in CF?). It's not a bad idea in theory, but it's hard to see how those specific combinations are going to get them where they want to go in 2015.
And we're still going to be paying a lot of money to middling 5th/6th starters as it stands. If we're trying to shave payroll in some areas to spend elsewhere and thus remain competitive, those are precisely the sorts of players that we cannot afford.

**** your asterisk.