ImageImageImageImage

So Romo has to play in London, right?

Moderator: Texas Chuck

Manster7588
Senior
Posts: 584
And1: 28
Joined: Oct 17, 2014
       

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#21 » by Manster7588 » Thu Nov 6, 2014 3:57 am

Romotodez wrote:HE didn't practicE today in pads. Did go thru the wk thru. That's his normal routine. I thouGht he would go today. I think he is hurting.


He hasn't practiced Wednesday all season. Why start doing so now?
Romotodez
Pro Prospect
Posts: 802
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 20, 2014
   

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#22 » by Romotodez » Thu Nov 6, 2014 4:05 am

I just thought he might go. Here is my question though- JG says he will have to prove he can function. Obviously Sunday he will receive a shot. Does he take a shot tomorrow before practice or Friday?
Manster7588
Senior
Posts: 584
And1: 28
Joined: Oct 17, 2014
       

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#23 » by Manster7588 » Thu Nov 6, 2014 4:59 am

I doubt he's getting more than one shot a week. Granted I don't play football but I've had a few pain killing shots in my lower back. They seem to last a few months for me. He'll probably get one late Friday or early Saturday.
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 22,559
And1: 5,084
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#24 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Nov 6, 2014 9:13 am

Come on guys. We've seen this Jerry dog and pony show before. Jerry is just making drama and Cowboy nation is in panic. I look at it this way. If we can't beat a team like the Jaguars, even without Romo, then we are not a playoff team, plain and simple.
RJ MacReady1
Sophomore
Posts: 169
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 22, 2014
 

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#25 » by RJ MacReady1 » Thu Nov 6, 2014 12:28 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:Come on guys. We've seen this Jerry dog and pony show before. Jerry is just making drama and Cowboy nation is in panic. I look at it this way. If we can't beat a team like the Jaguars, even without Romo, then we are not a playoff team, plain and simple.



Lets be clear about 1 thing.

Jerry is a far far second to forcing the issue of getting Romo back in the game then Romo himself.
If Jerry is saying Romo is playing on Thrusday, Romo would have said it on Wednesday.
If Jerry is saying Romo's back feels good, Romo is saying it feels great.
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 22,559
And1: 5,084
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#26 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Nov 6, 2014 9:05 pm

I'm just saying we should be able to win this game even without Romo if we are true playoff team.
tw1st3d
Sophomore
Posts: 140
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#27 » by tw1st3d » Thu Nov 6, 2014 9:08 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:I'm just saying we should be able to win this game even without Romo if we are true playoff team.


have to disagree ...

Do we have a chance to win without Romo ... certainly ...

But in todays game the difference in a 1 win team and a 10 win team is a matter of a handful of plays .... every team is a professional team ..... Not like anyone has high schoolers on their roster
tw1st3d
Sophomore
Posts: 140
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#28 » by tw1st3d » Thu Nov 6, 2014 9:11 pm

Hell if Parcels had a decent field goal kicker while he was here .... He might still be here

Whole time he was with this team ... anything past 30 ..... and fingers were crossed

and it went to the extent we went out and paid Vanderjact( yup thats spelt wrong) .... who bombed

Kinda had to feel for Bill ... He wasnt in position to even let the team kick an average field goal
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 22,559
And1: 5,084
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#29 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Nov 6, 2014 9:27 pm

tw1st3d wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:I'm just saying we should be able to win this game even without Romo if we are true playoff team.


have to disagree ...

Do we have a chance to win without Romo ... certainly ...

But in todays game the difference in a 1 win team and a 10 win team is a matter of a handful of plays .... every team is a professional team ..... Not like anyone has high schoolers on their roster


JMHO, whether Romo plays or not, if we don't win this game then we are not going to win the division or make the playoffs or deserve to.
tw1st3d
Sophomore
Posts: 140
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#30 » by tw1st3d » Thu Nov 6, 2014 9:57 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
tw1st3d wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:I'm just saying we should be able to win this game even without Romo if we are true playoff team.


have to disagree ...

Do we have a chance to win without Romo ... certainly ...

But in todays game the difference in a 1 win team and a 10 win team is a matter of a handful of plays .... every team is a professional team ..... Not like anyone has high schoolers on their roster


JMHO, whether Romo plays or not, if we don't win this game then we are not going to win the division or make the playoffs or deserve to.



Why? every other division ... it up for grabs as well ....
Cowboycolors
Sophomore
Posts: 116
And1: 7
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#31 » by Cowboycolors » Thu Nov 6, 2014 10:03 pm

we need to win the game but more importantly Romo needs to be healthy for the rest of the season without him the Boys are Toast
tw1st3d
Sophomore
Posts: 140
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#32 » by tw1st3d » Thu Nov 6, 2014 10:17 pm

Cowboycolors wrote:we need to win the game but more importantly Romo needs to be healthy for the rest of the season without him the Boys are Toast


totally agreed
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 22,559
And1: 5,084
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#33 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Nov 6, 2014 10:54 pm

So the sports pundits should put Romo on the MVP list and take off Murray and the O-line. Our team isn't good enough to win without Romo is what you are basically saying here.
tw1st3d
Sophomore
Posts: 140
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#34 » by tw1st3d » Thu Nov 6, 2014 11:01 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:So the sports pundits should put Romo on the MVP list and take off Murray and the O-line. Our team isn't good enough to win without Romo is what you are basically saying here.



who said that?


but I'll butter up ... Weeden aint the answer ... not even a hold your own answer like Orton was
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 22,559
And1: 5,084
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#35 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Nov 6, 2014 11:16 pm

Quite a few on ESPN, some on NESN and a few on Comcast. Just about everyone here in New England has Murray, Manning and Brady as the top MVP guys so far this year. All I am saying twist, is we should be able to win this game without Romo if we are a true playoff team. But what do I know, I'm just a ball boy.
tw1st3d
Sophomore
Posts: 140
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#36 » by tw1st3d » Thu Nov 6, 2014 11:23 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:Quite a few on ESPN, some on NESN and a few on Comcast. Just about everyone here in New England has Murray, Manning and Brady as the top MVP guys so far this year. All I am saying twist, is we should be able to win this game without Romo if we are a true playoff team. But what do I know, I'm just a ball boy.



relax bruh


this kiss kiss crap is all fine and dandy .... but at some point we gotta pick each others opinions apart

thats what a board is for ....
tw1st3d
Sophomore
Posts: 140
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#37 » by tw1st3d » Thu Nov 6, 2014 11:25 pm

not much of a discussion if we dont
User avatar
Schmoopy1000
Junior
Posts: 421
And1: 18
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
   

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#38 » by Schmoopy1000 » Thu Nov 6, 2014 11:38 pm

I'll say it.
If romo gets hurt & is out a while we don't have a chance to make the playoffs. take it to the bank!
RJ MacReady1
Sophomore
Posts: 169
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 22, 2014
 

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#39 » by RJ MacReady1 » Thu Nov 6, 2014 11:51 pm

Schmoopy1000 wrote:I'll say it.
If romo gets hurt & is out a while we don't have a chance to make the playoffs. take it to the bank!


I would like to see Vaughn first before making that call. ...you never know.

There is an immediate short term and long term need to see what the kid can do.
tw1st3d
Sophomore
Posts: 140
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: So Romo has to play in London, right? 

Post#40 » by tw1st3d » Fri Nov 7, 2014 12:01 am

RJ MacReady1 wrote:
Schmoopy1000 wrote:I'll say it.
If romo gets hurt & is out a while we don't have a chance to make the playoffs. take it to the bank!


I would like to see Vaughn first before making that call. ...you never know.

There is an immediate short term and long term need to see what the kid can do.



I wantedto see Vaughn in the 4th last week .... figured we couldnt do worse

I like the kid ... as a starter right now no .... but I like his potential and confidence

Return to Dallas Cowboys