Thibs love affair w kirk

ikeziskash · Post #1 » by **ikeziskash** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 2:27 am

How can he keep playing such an awful player AND giving hin the green light? The love affair with "effort" players is damaging our team. No way Thibs would tolerate a rookie or others to take and miss so many terrible shots.

Bulls69 · Post #2 » by **Bulls69** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 2:30 am

Kirk must have some freaky pic of Thibs

Post #3 » by **Payt10** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 2:33 am

Preaching to the choir.

MAQ · Post #4 » by **MAQ** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 2:35 am

ikeziskash wrote:How can he keep playing such an awful player AND giving hin the green light? The love affair with "effort" players is damaging our team. No way Thibs would tolerate a rookie or others to take and miss so many terrible shots.

Kirk doesn't take many terrible shots. He just misses a lot.

And I'm pretty sure Thibs is riding Kirk like that because Brooks has no idea how to run the defense as a team.

MAQ · Post #5 » by **MAQ** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 2:36 am

Oh...and because Rose won't play with an ankle issue.

pylb · Post #6 » by **pylb** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 2:37 am

Kirk has been subpar defensively unfortunately these last two games.

Nut I think the main reason Kirk is playing so many minutes is because Rose and Brooks are injured and Moore isn't good.

Angry Jimmy · Post #7 » by **Angry Jimmy** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 2:40 am

Bulls69 wrote:Kirk must have some freaky pic of Thibs

He does, I heard he hired the same private investigator who Duhon hired to find him freaky pics of Skiles, one of the best in the biz.

Benedict Miller · Post #8 » by **Benedict Miller** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 2:46 am

MAQ wrote:Oh...and because Rose won't play with an ankle issue.

Yeah let's blame Rose for this ass whipping. We can't beat a Celtics team who's without Rondo & Smart.

Post #9 » by **Payt10** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 2:50 am

I'm really not sure why Noah is even in the game at this point.

Red Larrivee · Post #10 » by **Red Larrivee** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 3:00 am

So is this going to be the third season in a row that Hinrich is outplayed by a veteran minimum backup point guard?

dice · Post #11 » by **dice** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 3:06 am

Red Larrivee wrote:So is this going to be the third season in a row that Hinrich is outplayed by a veteran minimum backup point guard?

offensively? probably so

Red Larrivee · Post #12 » by **Red Larrivee** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 3:07 am

dice wrote:offensively? probably so

His defense hasn't been so good that it trumps the other players offense and those players winning games.

dice · Post #13 » by **dice** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 3:11 am

Red Larrivee wrote:
dice wrote:offensively? probably so

His defense hasn't been so good that it trumps the other players offense and those players winning games.

games are won over 48 minutes. on both ends of the floor. and there's a very good reason these guys were available for the vet min

Red Larrivee · Post #14 » by **Red Larrivee** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 3:13 am

dice wrote:games are won over 48 minutes. on both ends of the floor. and there's a very good reason these guys were available for the vet min

Hinrich doesn't impact winning games. He blends in regardless of the result.

TruthSerum · Post #15 » by **TruthSerum** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 3:13 am

Hate to say it... but... seems like somebody is missing at the point.

dice · Post #16 » by **dice** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 3:15 am

Red Larrivee wrote:
dice wrote:games are won over 48 minutes. on both ends of the floor. and there's a very good reason these guys were available for the vet min

Hinrich doesn't impact winning games. He blends in regardless of the result.

every player on the court impacts winning (or losing)

Red Larrivee · Post #17 » by **Red Larrivee** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 3:16 am

dice wrote:every player on the court impacts winning (or losing)

Not necessarily.

jcuuofd · Post #18 » by **jcuuofd** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 3:16 am

This loss falls squarely on Hinrich's elfish shoulders. I'd rather have Mike James, or anyone other than Hinrich.

dice · Post #19 » by **dice** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 3:18 am

Red Larrivee wrote:
dice wrote:every player on the court impacts winning (or losing)

Not necessarily.

find a nicer way please. Thanks ~fleet

Red Larrivee · Post #20 » by **Red Larrivee** » Sun Nov 9, 2014 3:21 am

dice wrote:

Because it doesn't fit your argument? Not every player in basketball truthfully impacts a game, especially not a player like Hinrich who's extremely limited in skill and talent at this point.