ImageImage

Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,883
And1: 41,260
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#401 » by emunney » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:07 am

LikeABosh wrote:Rodgers broke the tie with Favre and Manning for most +70 yard TD passes

Kind of an arbitrary stat, but still cool considering he was tied with those guys when they have 10 years on him


It seems weird that 17 is the most anybody's had. I would have said Rodgers has one of the best deep balls ever even without seeing that, but it's kind of eye-popping that he's already there. I would assume they're mostly Jordy and Jennings.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
packfan414
Senior
Posts: 731
And1: 171
Joined: Dec 26, 2012

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#402 » by packfan414 » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:07 am

WiscoKing13 wrote:Picked this link up from twitter, and I don't know how it's different but it works http://player.radio.com/listen/station/670-the-score


this link works. this is a treasure trove of entertainment
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#403 » by WiscoKing13 » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:07 am

ampd wrote:Do they really owe Cutler $54m guaranteed? :o

These guys on the score are losing their ****

I think it's 54 when he signed it, but he's down 22 going forward. Don't quote me on that, but that's how I would interpret it.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
packfan414
Senior
Posts: 731
And1: 171
Joined: Dec 26, 2012

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#404 » by packfan414 » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:10 am

this postgame host on 670 is just going on a rant. he's literally saying nothing. he makes ellerson on 1250 sound smart
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,607
And1: 5,049
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#405 » by ampd » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:11 am

packfan414 wrote:this postgame host on 670 is just going on a rant. he's literally saying nothing. he makes ellerson on 1250 sound smart


It sounds like he had 8 beers during the game
User avatar
Ill-yasova
RealGM
Posts: 13,364
And1: 2,562
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#406 » by Ill-yasova » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:13 am

Mags FTW wrote:
packfan414 wrote:just tuned into the score. should be fantastic.

My app isn't working. This sucks.

http://player.radio.com/listen/station/670-the-score
GB_Packers
Head Coach
Posts: 6,426
And1: 1,248
Joined: Sep 09, 2013

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#407 » by GB_Packers » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:15 am

Guys on The Score losing their ****. This is amazing.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,883
And1: 41,260
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#408 » by emunney » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:16 am

ampd wrote:Do they really owe Cutler $54m guaranteed? :o

These guys on the score are losing their ****


Nah, just this year's and next year's base are guaranteed right now. That's 38m though. If they cut him before March next year, they avoid the first 10m of his 2016 deal becoming guaranteed, but still have to pay him his 16.5 for next year (plus the remaining 3m on his restructuring bonus for a total cap hit of 19.5m).

Then the March before the following season, the rest of that year's base becomes guaranteed. It is similar to a 54m full guarantee in that cutting him before 2017 gives Cutler a huge amount of money to not play. But technically, they don't have to pay him all of it yet.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#409 » by WiscoKing13 » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:17 am

Someone get MM a Kleenex, brutal to listen to
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 15,528
And1: 10,868
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#410 » by HKPackFan » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:18 am

Can we keep clay mathews inside? Please please pretty please

Sent from my GT-I9505 using RealGM Forums mobile app
#FreeChuckDiesel
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 19,125
And1: 8,855
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#411 » by LikeABosh » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:19 am

emunney wrote:
LikeABosh wrote:Rodgers broke the tie with Favre and Manning for most +70 yard TD passes

Kind of an arbitrary stat, but still cool considering he was tied with those guys when they have 10 years on him


It seems weird that 17 is the most anybody's had. I would have said Rodgers has one of the best deep balls ever even without seeing that, but it's kind of eye-popping that he's already there. I would assume they're mostly Jordy and Jennings.


Looks like 6 for Jordy, 3 for Jennings, 3 for Jones, 2 for Driver, 1 for Cobb, 1 for Crabtree and I'm missing someone

Edit: Actually, the record is 16
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 15,528
And1: 10,868
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#412 » by HKPackFan » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:23 am

That screen was how long?

Sent from my GT-I9505 using RealGM Forums mobile app
#FreeChuckDiesel
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,785
And1: 27,353
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#413 » by trwi7 » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:25 am

HKPackFan wrote:That screen was how long?

Sent from my GT-I9505 using RealGM Forums mobile app


56
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 15,528
And1: 10,868
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#414 » by HKPackFan » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:32 am

Clay lead the D with 11 tackles 2 for loss 1 sack

Sent from my GT-I9505 using RealGM Forums mobile app
#FreeChuckDiesel
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 15,528
And1: 10,868
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#415 » by HKPackFan » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:33 am

He also had 1 sack taken off from Cutlers ducking manuveur

Sent from my GT-I9505 using RealGM Forums mobile app
#FreeChuckDiesel
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,607
And1: 5,049
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#416 » by ampd » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:34 am

The salty tears of these ppl on the score are delicious
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,607
And1: 5,049
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#417 » by ampd » Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:35 am

emunney wrote:
ampd wrote:Do they really owe Cutler $54m guaranteed? :o

These guys on the score are losing their ****


Nah, just this year's and next year's base are guaranteed right now. That's 38m though. If they cut him before March next year, they avoid the first 10m of his 2016 deal becoming guaranteed, but still have to pay him his 16.5 for next year (plus the remaining 3m on his restructuring bonus for a total cap hit of 19.5m).

Then the March before the following season, the rest of that year's base becomes guaranteed. It is similar to a 54m full guarantee in that cutting him before 2017 gives Cutler a huge amount of money to not play. But technically, they don't have to pay him all of it yet.


Thats still a lot of money, probably too much to cut him
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 15,528
And1: 10,868
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#418 » by HKPackFan » Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:43 am

ampd wrote:
emunney wrote:
ampd wrote:Do they really owe Cutler $54m guaranteed? :o

These guys on the score are losing their ****


Nah, just this year's and next year's base are guaranteed right now. That's 38m though. If they cut him before March next year, they avoid the first 10m of his 2016 deal becoming guaranteed, but still have to pay him his 16.5 for next year (plus the remaining 3m on his restructuring bonus for a total cap hit of 19.5m).

Then the March before the following season, the rest of that year's base becomes guaranteed. It is similar to a 54m full guarantee in that cutting him before 2017 gives Cutler a huge amount of money to not play. But technically, they don't have to pay him all of it yet.


Thats still a lot of money, probably too much to cut him



Well this goes here:

Image
#FreeChuckDiesel
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 15,528
And1: 10,868
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: Game Thread: Pack vs. Bears 

Post#419 » by HKPackFan » Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:50 am

Let's hope for more Jay Cutler through 2020!

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/chicago-bears/jay-cutler/

Almost impossible to cut him next year based on that chart.
#FreeChuckDiesel

Return to Green Bay Packers


cron