:)Bernman wrote:cinematographer wrote:Burke is not good.
What about Burkeovic?
Trade Targets (postcript on yesterday-other teams)
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
Re: Trade Targets
- cinematographer
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,754
- And1: 1,697
- Joined: Feb 22, 2013
Re: Trade Targets
Re: Trade Targets
- Garbs_7
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,583
- And1: 1,638
- Joined: Jan 03, 2005
- Location: Perth, Australia
-
Re: Trade Targets
I have a feeling Atlanta will make Teague available before Schroeder. Will be a lot cheaper for a few more years...
Re: Trade Targets
- CannondaleF400
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,031
- And1: 440
- Joined: May 31, 2013
Re: Trade Targets
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2261554-do-atlanta-hawks-need-a-trade-to-fix-broken-bench
Hawks need bench scoring - Knight/Middleton for Schroder?
Hawks need bench scoring - Knight/Middleton for Schroder?
Re: Trade Targets
- machu46
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,057
- And1: 4,392
- Joined: Jun 28, 2012
- Location: DC
-
Re: Trade Targets
CannondaleF400 wrote:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2261554-do-atlanta-hawks-need-a-trade-to-fix-broken-bench
Hawks need bench scoring - Knight/Middleton for Schroder?
I really don't think that's a good trade for us. I know a lot of people love Schroder, but I don't see him as a fit with Giannis and Jabari.
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
Re: Trade Targets
- Nowak008
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,588
- And1: 4,303
- Joined: Jul 07, 2006
- Location: Book Publisher
- Contact:
Re: Trade Targets
[tweet]https://twitter.com/AlexKennedyNBA/status/532029272207417344[/tweet]
I'd do Middleton + Knight.
I'd do Middleton + Knight.

John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters
THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
Re: Trade Targets
- breakchains
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,722
- And1: 2,708
- Joined: Jun 23, 2013
Re: Trade Targets
I would do any combination of players sans Giannis/Jabari/Sanders for Schroder, really.
Re: Trade Targets
- Rockmaninoff
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,710
- And1: 1,713
- Joined: Jan 11, 2008
-
Re: Trade Targets
Jeff Withey.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:The fight for civil rights just like for liberty and justice and peace won't be won by man. It will take a god...so lets move on to sports.
Magic Giannison wrote:Giannis is god but even god's cannot save our **** team.
Re: Trade Targets
- Nowak008
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,588
- And1: 4,303
- Joined: Jul 07, 2006
- Location: Book Publisher
- Contact:
Re: Trade Targets
Knight and Middleton for Schroder. Then Sanders for Len/TJ Warren + First + Salary filler. Gives us lots of young assets, plus we are right back in the thick of things for a top 5 pick.

John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters
THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
Re: Trade Targets
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,145
- And1: 41,684
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Trade Targets
Rockmaninoff wrote:Jeff Withey.
Marshall for Withey?
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Trade Targets
- MilHammer
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,432
- And1: 713
- Joined: Oct 30, 2014
-
Re: Trade Targets
Schroder looked nice today. If he keeps getting shirked minutes wise, I'd def make an offer. Won't get my hopes up though.
Re: Trade Targets
-
eagle13
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,145
- And1: 107
- Joined: Feb 15, 2007
- Location: san diego
Re: Trade Targets
Is there any reason the Wolves don’t go into rebuild with youngsters Rubio & Dieng as their core and trade vets Pekovic & Thad Young – whom they won’t win anything with anyway - for lottery pick(s)?
The Celtics have Rondo, Avery & Green as solid vet starters who they haven’t been able to trade. Would Celtics give up promising rookies Smart and Young to get TWolves’ starting bigs Pekovic and Thad Young?
Wolves tear it down & get early pick(s) – Celtics build it up & get prime vets – BUCKS get promising rookies
3 TEAM / 9 PLAYER
MIL-IN- Smart, JYoung
MIL-OUT- Knight-E, Middleton-E, 1st(Mil-T3), **
MN- IN- 1st(Mil-T3) Knight-E, Middleton-E, Faverani, Thornton-E, Bass-E, **
MN-OUT- Pekovic, TYoung,
BOS- IN- Pekovic, TYoung
BOS-OUT- Smart, JYoung, Faverani Thornton-E, Bass-E
** if Buck's own 1st is #7 or later then MN also receives 1st(LAC) from Bucks
Smart / Wolters / Marshall
Young / Mayo / Bayless
Giannis / Dudley / Inglis
Parker / Ersan / OBryant
Sanders / Henson / Zaza
The Celtics have Rondo, Avery & Green as solid vet starters who they haven’t been able to trade. Would Celtics give up promising rookies Smart and Young to get TWolves’ starting bigs Pekovic and Thad Young?
Wolves tear it down & get early pick(s) – Celtics build it up & get prime vets – BUCKS get promising rookies
3 TEAM / 9 PLAYER
MIL-IN- Smart, JYoung
MIL-OUT- Knight-E, Middleton-E, 1st(Mil-T3), **
MN- IN- 1st(Mil-T3) Knight-E, Middleton-E, Faverani, Thornton-E, Bass-E, **
MN-OUT- Pekovic, TYoung,
BOS- IN- Pekovic, TYoung
BOS-OUT- Smart, JYoung, Faverani Thornton-E, Bass-E
** if Buck's own 1st is #7 or later then MN also receives 1st(LAC) from Bucks
Smart / Wolters / Marshall
Young / Mayo / Bayless
Giannis / Dudley / Inglis
Parker / Ersan / OBryant
Sanders / Henson / Zaza
Trade Targets
- machu46
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,057
- And1: 4,392
- Joined: Jun 28, 2012
- Location: DC
-
Trade Targets
What do you guys love so much about Schroder? I've never understood why people were so enamored with. The only thing that's ever really stood out to me is that he's quick, but he can't shoot, is nothing special as a passer, and isn't anything special in terms of size either. Is he good enough at anything to make up for the fact that we'd be building around 3 players that can't shoot? (4 if you include Larry) I just don't see it.
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
Re: Trade Targets
-
Nebula1
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,829
- And1: 1,571
- Joined: Aug 06, 2005
- Location: Underground King
-
Re: Trade Targets
Schroder, McCollum, Barton, Goodwin, Ennis
Amare
Picks, obviously
Amare
Picks, obviously
Re: Trade Targets
- Bucks_MacGyver
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,759
- And1: 339
- Joined: Nov 16, 2009
-
Re: Trade Targets
I thought unrealistic trade ideas ended when training camp started..... #partypooper
Re: Trade Targets
-
Buckrageous
- Starter
- Posts: 2,247
- And1: 665
- Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Re: Trade Targets
Bucks_MacGyver wrote:I thought unrealistic trade ideas ended when training camp started..... #partypooper
Trade ideas for Rivers, Lamb, and Shroeder are always realistic and will continue until said players have long been retired........#bucksrealgm
Re: Trade Targets
- MiltownHawkeye
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,727
- And1: 4,457
- Joined: Jan 04, 2012
-
Re: Trade Targets
Buckrageous wrote:Bucks_MacGyver wrote:I thought unrealistic trade ideas ended when training camp started..... #partypooper
Trade ideas for Rivers, Lamb, and Shroeder are always realistic and will continue until said players have long been retired........#bucksrealgm
How can Bucks Real GM be so in love with those players when none of them are as good as Alec Burks?
Free Chuck Diesel
Fire Steve Novak
Fire Steve Novak
Re: Trade Targets
-
Giannis Parker
- Banned User
- Posts: 925
- And1: 169
- Joined: Oct 22, 2014
Re: Trade Targets
Any Player that is under the age of 29 and projects to fit great next to Giannis and Jabari is the player I am targeting. At 29 years old, the player will still have 3-4 very solid seasons left in them, and once they are up, that is when we are going to be looking at paying some of our home grown talent like Parker.
Realistically, we need a low post scoring threat, so going after someone like Al Horford would be a great addition in my books.
Build the team around Parker, Horford, and Sanders starting, and Giannis playing the Manu Ginobli role off the bench.
Realistically, we need a low post scoring threat, so going after someone like Al Horford would be a great addition in my books.
Build the team around Parker, Horford, and Sanders starting, and Giannis playing the Manu Ginobli role off the bench.
Re: Trade Targets
-
Giannis Parker
- Banned User
- Posts: 925
- And1: 169
- Joined: Oct 22, 2014
Re: Trade Targets
MiltownHawkeye wrote:Buckrageous wrote:Bucks_MacGyver wrote:I thought unrealistic trade ideas ended when training camp started..... #partypooper
Trade ideas for Rivers, Lamb, and Shroeder are always realistic and will continue until said players have long been retired........#bucksrealgm
How can Bucks Real GM be so in love with those players when none of them are as good as Alec Burks?
I think the correct answer is a predisposition for less than 20 wins for $1000.
Re: Trade Targets
- JimmyTheKid
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,062
- And1: 5,451
- Joined: Feb 10, 2009
Re: Trade Targets
Had a dream last night that we traded Brandon Knight for a lottery pick. Wet dream you might ask? No, we then signed Allen Iverson to a 3-year deal.
Re: Trade Targets
-
Nebula1
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,829
- And1: 1,571
- Joined: Aug 06, 2005
- Location: Underground King
-
Re: Trade Targets
MiltownHawkeye wrote:Buckrageous wrote:Bucks_MacGyver wrote:I thought unrealistic trade ideas ended when training camp started..... #partypooper
Trade ideas for Rivers, Lamb, and Shroeder are always realistic and will continue until said players have long been retired........#bucksrealgm
How can Bucks Real GM be so in love with those players when none of them are as good as Alec Burks?
There are different ways to quantify the additional value provided by some of these names. I think many of the guys, Schroder for example, provide a growth name at a needed position for a relatively cheaper price. Most understand this roster is going to grow based around Giannis and Parker and the 2015 pick, so adding pieces that have a perceived good fit make sense.












