ImageImageImage

The Andrew Wiggins Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Knicks_Fan2
RealGM
Posts: 20,348
And1: 4,675
Joined: May 14, 2010

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#121 » by Knicks_Fan2 » Thu Nov 6, 2014 6:19 pm

He looks great guys. Congrats and look forward to see his development over the next 2-3 years. don't listen to the noise.
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#122 » by big3_8_19_21 » Thu Nov 6, 2014 10:23 pm

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51aS6Ul1J60[/youtube]
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,616
And1: 22,978
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#123 » by Klomp » Thu Nov 6, 2014 11:07 pm

His +8.8 is the best on the team through four games, ahead of both Ricky Rubio and Nikola Pekovic (+7.3).
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
AttackTheRack
Junior
Posts: 481
And1: 82
Joined: Jan 10, 2008

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#124 » by AttackTheRack » Fri Nov 7, 2014 5:53 am

A legit stud. A KG-level impact player. Needs time. No use projecting career arcs this early in the game, but . . . we've all seen the glimpses. That J is wet!! If Andrew Wiggins wants a jumpshot, Andrew Wiggins gets a jumpshot. It's that simple. Not really talking about right now, but next year? The year after? The mid range J. The 3. The contact and continue. The FTs. The tip ins. It's all there. You can't keep him off the scoreboard. Not with those physical gifts. Only if he's ice cold. I thought he was going just SMASH that dunk!
User avatar
MinneOOPalis
Analyst
Posts: 3,457
And1: 1,415
Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Location: Minneapolis
   

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#125 » by MinneOOPalis » Fri Nov 7, 2014 6:01 am

We hit the jackpot, boys.
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,448
And1: 11,229
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#126 » by MrSparkle » Fri Nov 7, 2014 7:53 pm

You guys sure did!

I never bought the Wiggins hate... found it comical how unreasonable the predictions were. There's no way a player with his defensive floor could bust, esp. considering he showed he was capable of 40+ point games in college.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,530
And1: 4,992
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#127 » by theGreatRC » Fri Nov 7, 2014 8:13 pm

Once he learns to have better handle/ball security..he is going to become an unstoppable force.
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
Merc_Porto
General Manager
Posts: 9,941
And1: 3,540
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
   

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#128 » by Merc_Porto » Fri Nov 7, 2014 8:16 pm

theGreatRC wrote:Once he learns to have better handle/ball security..he is going to become an unstoppable force.


Yes, pretty much this ...
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,616
And1: 22,978
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#129 » by Klomp » Fri Nov 7, 2014 9:53 pm

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_JjGZYpy7I[/youtube]
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
aminiaturebuddha
Head Coach
Posts: 6,871
And1: 7,470
Joined: Aug 07, 2006

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#130 » by aminiaturebuddha » Sat Nov 8, 2014 3:04 pm

I've only seen parts of Minnesota games so far this year, but every time Wiggins has played he looks pretty good. But I notice that once again last night he only got 25 minutes and 6 shots. Any ideas why?

Also, are you guys alright with this as just a natural part of his development, or do you think he should be played and featured a little more?
User avatar
Nitroglycerin
Starter
Posts: 2,475
And1: 528
Joined: Dec 15, 2012
Location: Philippines
 

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#131 » by Nitroglycerin » Sat Nov 8, 2014 3:23 pm

aminiaturebuddha wrote:I've only seen parts of Minnesota games so far this year, but every time Wiggins has played he looks pretty good. But I notice that once again last night he only got 25 minutes and 6 shots. Any ideas why?

Also, are you guys alright with this as just a natural part of his development, or do you think he should be played and featured a little more?


Believing in the rookieAfter relying upon Wiggins to defend Chicago’sJimmy Butlerwith Saturday’s game on the line aswell as Brooklyn’sJoe Johnsonin Wednesday’s fourth quarters, Saunders turned to veteranCoreyBrewerin Friday’s overtime after Orlando’sTobias Harrisoutscored Wiggins 17-6 and outrebounded him 16-3 in the small-forward matchup.“Floating a little bit too much,” Saunders said, “and Brewer was having a hell of a game.”Still, Saunders said before the game he’s convinced Wiggins is the best man for the job both because of the player he is now and the player will become.“That’s what he’s going to be,” Saunders said. “He’s advanced defensively right now, and that’s what he’s going to be. He’s also different than Corey because Corey’s a mosquito-type defender, a pest. But Joe Johnson and Butler, both those guys are pretty heavy in the pants andCorey’s pretty light in the pants. Drew is a little bigger, a little longer and he’s deceivingly long. The main thing is he’s going to be an elite defender before anything else.”
Trust the PRosas!
righterwriter
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,835
And1: 5,612
Joined: Apr 30, 2013
     

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#132 » by righterwriter » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:54 am

He's Harrison Barnes with more quickness. Compare all of their measurables, college numbers, and their rookie season stats.
User avatar
urinesane
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,012
And1: 2,887
Joined: May 10, 2010
 

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#133 » by urinesane » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:03 am

righterwriter wrote:He's Harrison Barnes with more quickness. Compare all of their measurables, college numbers, and their rookie season stats.


That's a pretty lazy assessment, especially this early in his rookie year.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,530
And1: 4,992
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#134 » by theGreatRC » Wed Nov 12, 2014 3:30 am

righterwriter wrote:He's Harrison Barnes with more quickness. Compare all of their measurables, college numbers, and their rookie season stats.


Id like to know why you think that
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
User avatar
Zeitgeister
General Manager
Posts: 8,791
And1: 7,594
Joined: Nov 11, 2008
   

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#135 » by Zeitgeister » Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:31 am

righterwriter wrote:He's Harrison Barnes with more quickness. Compare all of their measurables, college numbers, and their rookie season stats.


He's quicker than Barnes, a more explosive leaper just an all around superior athlete. He has more versatility defensively. In college, they were fairly close statistically their rookie years but Wiggins was better. Wiggins had a 21.4 PER, Barnes had a 19.4 PER. Wiggins had a .563 TS% and Barnes had a .528 TS% which is a pretty substantial difference and Wiggins did that while scoring more points. There's little to be gained from analyzing Wiggins' stats this early into the season either.
Lenin wrote: All over the world, wherever there are capitalists, freedom of the press means freedom to buy up newspapers, to buy writers, to bribe, buy and fake "public opinion" for the benefit of the bourgeoisie.
User avatar
southern wolf
General Manager
Posts: 9,854
And1: 2,163
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Australia
   

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#136 » by southern wolf » Wed Nov 12, 2014 10:18 am

Nitroglycerin wrote:
aminiaturebuddha wrote:I've only seen parts of Minnesota games so far this year, but every time Wiggins has played he looks pretty good. But I notice that once again last night he only got 25 minutes and 6 shots. Any ideas why?

Also, are you guys alright with this as just a natural part of his development, or do you think he should be played and featured a little more?


Believing in the rookieAfter relying upon Wiggins to defend Chicago’sJimmy Butlerwith Saturday’s game on the line aswell as Brooklyn’sJoe Johnsonin Wednesday’s fourth quarters, Saunders turned to veteranCoreyBrewerin Friday’s overtime after Orlando’sTobias Harrisoutscored Wiggins 17-6 and outrebounded him 16-3 in the small-forward matchup.“Floating a little bit too much,” Saunders said, “and Brewer was having a hell of a game.”Still, Saunders said before the game he’s convinced Wiggins is the best man for the job both because of the player he is now and the player will become.“That’s what he’s going to be,” Saunders said. “He’s advanced defensively right now, and that’s what he’s going to be. He’s also different than Corey because Corey’s a mosquito-type defender, a pest. But Joe Johnson and Butler, both those guys are pretty heavy in the pants andCorey’s pretty light in the pants. Drew is a little bigger, a little longer and he’s deceivingly long. The main thing is he’s going to be an elite defender before anything else.”


:o
FinnTheHuman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,552
And1: 3,719
Joined: Nov 22, 2012
   

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#137 » by FinnTheHuman » Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:38 pm

righterwriter wrote:He's Harrison Barnes with more quickness. Compare all of their measurables, college numbers, and their rookie season stats.


I don't know their wingspan measurements, but every Warriors fan is complaining about Barnes' short arms and how he can't defend well because of that, while Wiggins definitely doesn't have that problem.
righterwriter
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,835
And1: 5,612
Joined: Apr 30, 2013
     

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#138 » by righterwriter » Wed Nov 12, 2014 8:59 pm

FinnTheHuman wrote:
righterwriter wrote:He's Harrison Barnes with more quickness. Compare all of their measurables, college numbers, and their rookie season stats.


I don't know their wingspan measurements, but every Warriors fan is complaining about Barnes' short arms and how he can't defend well because of that, while Wiggins definitely doesn't have that problem.


Barnes wingspan is 6'11.25 and Wiggins is 7'0.

Barnes is bigger and more capable of playing on the block. Wiggins is more outside orientated. Both share a certain passivity to utilize their superior physical and athletic gifts, perhaps due to their lack of ball handling, but I think more related to their character and personality. I think they are both looking at careers as role players, with the occasional flash of brilliance.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,478
And1: 12,347
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#139 » by Worm Guts » Wed Nov 12, 2014 9:02 pm

Barnes really doesn't have anything special in terms of athletic gifts. Wiggins has elite level explosiveness. That doesn't guarantee he'll be a special player, but he's definitely more gifted than Barnes.
User avatar
urinesane
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,012
And1: 2,887
Joined: May 10, 2010
 

Re: The Andrew Wiggins Thread 

Post#140 » by urinesane » Wed Nov 12, 2014 9:42 pm

righterwriter wrote:
FinnTheHuman wrote:
righterwriter wrote:He's Harrison Barnes with more quickness. Compare all of their measurables, college numbers, and their rookie season stats.


I don't know their wingspan measurements, but every Warriors fan is complaining about Barnes' short arms and how he can't defend well because of that, while Wiggins definitely doesn't have that problem.


Barnes wingspan is 6'11.25 and Wiggins is 7'0.

Barnes is bigger and more capable of playing on the block. Wiggins is more outside orientated. Both share a certain passivity to utilize their superior physical and athletic gifts, perhaps due to their lack of ball handling, but I think more related to their character and personality. I think they are both looking at careers as role players, with the occasional flash of brilliance.


Lol, Barnes is bigger? Is that maybe because he's 3 years older?

Stop being silly, just because Barnes was overhyped and underwhelmed doesn't mean 6 games into Wiggins rookie year that they are the same. They aren't, Wiggins will be at least a star, if not a super star.

Wiggins is an athletic FREAK at 19. Barnes isn't (at 22).

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves