TDotsfinest97 wrote:Unleah Fields a.k.a The LeBron Stopper
I didn't have my glasses on and I read this as the LeBron Supper
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
TDotsfinest97 wrote:Unleah Fields a.k.a The LeBron Stopper
Flight33 wrote:Bruno isn't going to make any difference.
Choker wrote:
Put that jersey on boy, you're going in.


for_tdot wrote:Choker wrote:
Put that jersey on boy, you're going in.
I hope Casey's thinking what you're thinking.![]()

Chuck Newhouse wrote:Why is it that these idiot trainers put guys back in games after they roll their ankles. It happens ALL the time. You would think after years of seeing players claim they are fine after this happens and then having to miss 2 weeks because they were stupid enough to put them back in they would learn. This injury always hurts way more the next day unless you very quickly get ice on it and then stay off it for a couple days. Pisses me off!
Dukenukem23 wrote:Chuck Newhouse wrote:Why is it that these idiot trainers put guys back in games after they roll their ankles. It happens ALL the time. You would think after years of seeing players claim they are fine after this happens and then having to miss 2 weeks because they were stupid enough to put them back in they would learn. This injury always hurts way more the next day unless you very quickly get ice on it and then stay off it for a couple days. Pisses me off!
Thought I'd chime in here to say that I think your incorrect at least from my own personal experiences. I've played competitive ball most of my life and as such have the ankles of a 90 year old man. Lol. In that I can tell you that if you can walk or in James case actually run and jump on the injured ankle then your injury isn't absolitely critical and walking or playing (pain permitted) is actually more therapeutic than staying off it. Once again this is only the case of it's not a severe injury such as a fracture or a complete rupture of all the ligaments and tenson damage. Anything soft tissue related heals much faster by continuing the natural walking motion to maintain flexibility, strength and milk out swelling from your feet. There are many studies showing a faster recovery time for athletes that don't follow the old age RICE approach and adopt an approach focused on keeping the mobility in the joint to reduce scar tissue build up.
Chuck Newhouse wrote:Dukenukem23 wrote:Chuck Newhouse wrote:Why is it that these idiot trainers put guys back in games after they roll their ankles. It happens ALL the time. You would think after years of seeing players claim they are fine after this happens and then having to miss 2 weeks because they were stupid enough to put them back in they would learn. This injury always hurts way more the next day unless you very quickly get ice on it and then stay off it for a couple days. Pisses me off!
Thought I'd chime in here to say that I think your incorrect at least from my own personal experiences. I've played competitive ball most of my life and as such have the ankles of a 90 year old man. Lol. In that I can tell you that if you can walk or in James case actually run and jump on the injured ankle then your injury isn't absolitely critical and walking or playing (pain permitted) is actually more therapeutic than staying off it. Once again this is only the case of it's not a severe injury such as a fracture or a complete rupture of all the ligaments and tenson damage. Anything soft tissue related heals much faster by continuing the natural walking motion to maintain flexibility, strength and milk out swelling from your feet. There are many studies showing a faster recovery time for athletes that don't follow the old age RICE approach and adopt an approach focused on keeping the mobility in the joint to reduce scar tissue build up.
No way...I had 2 identical ankle injuries in 2006. I rolled both in the same stairwell and the second I iced immediately. One week vs two week recovery. You have to ice swelling first. Walking slowly after the swelling goes down is not the same as playing pro ball while the swelling is still happening.

Dukenukem23 wrote:Chuck Newhouse wrote:Dukenukem23 wrote:
Thought I'd chime in here to say that I think your incorrect at least from my own personal experiences. I've played competitive ball most of my life and as such have the ankles of a 90 year old man. Lol. In that I can tell you that if you can walk or in James case actually run and jump on the injured ankle then your injury isn't absolitely critical and walking or playing (pain permitted) is actually more therapeutic than staying off it. Once again this is only the case of it's not a severe injury such as a fracture or a complete rupture of all the ligaments and tenson damage. Anything soft tissue related heals much faster by continuing the natural walking motion to maintain flexibility, strength and milk out swelling from your feet. There are many studies showing a faster recovery time for athletes that don't follow the old age RICE approach and adopt an approach focused on keeping the mobility in the joint to reduce scar tissue build up.
No way...I had 2 identical ankle injuries in 2006. I rolled both in the same stairwell and the second I iced immediately. One week vs two week recovery. You have to ice swelling first. Walking slowly after the swelling goes down is not the same as playing pro ball while the swelling is still happening.
Recovery time is generally faster each time you reinjure your ankle. You have rolled your ankle twice, I have rolled mine 20+ some which took a week and others that took a full year to fully recover. Each injury is different and just because you rolled it in the same location does not mean the tissue damage would be the same.
Dukenukem23 wrote:Chuck Newhouse wrote:Dukenukem23 wrote:
Thought I'd chime in here to say that I think your incorrect at least from my own personal experiences. I've played competitive ball most of my life and as such have the ankles of a 90 year old man. Lol. In that I can tell you that if you can walk or in James case actually run and jump on the injured ankle then your injury isn't absolitely critical and walking or playing (pain permitted) is actually more therapeutic than staying off it. Once again this is only the case of it's not a severe injury such as a fracture or a complete rupture of all the ligaments and tenson damage. Anything soft tissue related heals much faster by continuing the natural walking motion to maintain flexibility, strength and milk out swelling from your feet. There are many studies showing a faster recovery time for athletes that don't follow the old age RICE approach and adopt an approach focused on keeping the mobility in the joint to reduce scar tissue build up.
No way...I had 2 identical ankle injuries in 2006. I rolled both in the same stairwell and the second I iced immediately. One week vs two week recovery. You have to ice swelling first. Walking slowly after the swelling goes down is not the same as playing pro ball while the swelling is still happening.
Recovery time is generally faster each time you reinjure your ankle. You have rolled your ankle twice, I have rolled mine 20+ some which took a week and others that took a full year to fully recover. Each injury is different and just because you rolled it in the same location does not mean the tissue damage would be the same.
Chuck Newhouse wrote:Why is it that these idiot trainers put guys back in games after they roll their ankles. It happens ALL the time. You would think after years of seeing players claim they are fine after this happens and then having to miss 2 weeks because they were stupid enough to put them back in they would learn. This injury always hurts way more the next day unless you very quickly get ice on it and then stay off it for a couple days. Pisses me off!

Chuck Newhouse wrote:Dukenukem23 wrote:Chuck Newhouse wrote:
No way...I had 2 identical ankle injuries in 2006. I rolled both in the same stairwell and the second I iced immediately. One week vs two week recovery. You have to ice swelling first. Walking slowly after the swelling goes down is not the same as playing pro ball while the swelling is still happening.
Recovery time is generally faster each time you reinjure your ankle. You have rolled your ankle twice, I have rolled mine 20+ some which took a week and others that took a full year to fully recover. Each injury is different and just because you rolled it in the same location does not mean the tissue damage would be the same.
It doesn't mean it was but it was. I have rolled my ankle way more times than that. Those were so totally similar in every way that I chose to use it as a comparison. I have also kept a mental count in my head every time I see it in a game since then just to see if my hypothesis is accurate and I have noticed that when someone is allowed to play again, when it looks fairly severe, they almost always miss 2 weeks. You gotta ice swelling asap.
AlwaysFresh wrote:Just inject his leg with a bunch of illegal pain killers and put him on the court. A win here would be huge