Wizardspride wrote:
I guess it's quantity over quality. I'm going with quality.
I don't think Len qualifies as "quality" just yet. All those guys right now are clearly better than him...so far.
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Wizardspride wrote:
I guess it's quantity over quality. I'm going with quality.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Wizardspride wrote:dckingsfan wrote:TGW wrote:Alex Len, the guy I probably would have drafted with the pick, is starting to play better. He still has a lot of work to do but he's showing signs.
Last year was a great year to draft a center. I wanted to come out of the draft with at least one of the centers available. Grunfeld, as usual, showed no imagination with the pick.
Agreed, really wanted them to trade down for two of the bigs... probably wasn't feasible - but I would have liked them to try.
Forget trading down. I thought Len was worthy of being selected at #3 based off his upside alone.
I think we're starting to see that upside.
TGW wrote:Wizardspride wrote:
I guess it's quantity over quality. I'm going with quality.
I don't think Len qualifies as "quality" just yet. All those guys right now are clearly better than him...so far.
Illmatic12 wrote:Wizardspride wrote:dckingsfan wrote:
Agreed, really wanted them to trade down for two of the bigs... probably wasn't feasible - but I would have liked them to try.
Forget trading down. I thought Len was worthy of being selected at #3 based off his upside alone.
I think we're starting to see that upside.
Len dropped because of injury issues. Look at his injury history, it's not good. Really hope he does well in the league though.
Wizardspride wrote:dckingsfan wrote:Wizardspride wrote:Forget trading down. I thought Len was worthy of being selected at #3 based off his upside alone.
I think we're starting to see that upside.
I would MUCH rather have taken two of Plumlee, Dieng, Gobert, Olynyk.
Maybe.
Personally, I think Len will ultimately prove to be better than all those guys.
I guess it's quantity over quality. I'm going with quality.
Wizardspride wrote:Illmatic12 wrote:Wizardspride wrote:Forget trading down. I thought Len was worthy of being selected at #3 based off his upside alone.
I think we're starting to see that upside.
Len dropped because of injury issues. Look at his injury history, it's not good. Really hope he does well in the league though.
His injury history is one major thing: A stress reaction in his foot.
Don't get me wrong. It's risky when a big guy has foot issues but it's not like he tore his ACL multiple times.
tontoz wrote:I watched Len in college and wanted no part of him. He just didn't look that interested in basketball. Not much of a motor. You can't teach desire.
Wizardspride wrote:tontoz wrote:I watched Len in college and wanted no part of him. He just didn't look that interested in basketball. Not much of a motor. You can't teach desire.
Well judging from his play lately he suddenly got "desire".
Personally,I never thought Len had a lack of desire in college.
More like a lack strength and experience.
And the fact that he was playing with some crappy guards didn't help matters.
tontoz wrote:Wizardspride wrote:tontoz wrote:I watched Len in college and wanted no part of him. He just didn't look that interested in basketball. Not much of a motor. You can't teach desire.
Well judging from his play lately he suddenly got "desire".
Personally,I never thought Len had a lack of desire in college.
More like a lack strength and experience.
And the fact that he was playing with some crappy guards didn't help matters.
I seriously doubt the Terps guard play was the reason for Len's anemic rebounding.
Not impressed by the SSST numbers either. It will take more than 2 good games to change my opinion of him. There have been stretches of games where Josh Smith was a good 3 point shooter. So what?
stevemcqueen1 wrote:Compare Porter to Noel, that's the guy the majority of the board wanted. And the majority of the fan base, judging by how quickly everyone seemed to sour on Otto after he missed so much time last season.
I think Otto ends up a much better two way player than Noel and that that was predictable at the time of the draft. Otto is way ahead of Noel right now.
The one guy I thought might make us have some buyer's remorse with Otto was Cody Zeller, but that hasn't been the case and I don't think it will be in the end.
I think Otto ends up being the best player and pick out of that top ten. Oladipo is pretty good, but I think Otto is better and has higher upside since he's the same age and has a true NBA position. I think he ends up being the best perimeter player in that class.
Dark Faze wrote:I like Otto but you seriously want to offer that strong of an opinion of Porter over Noel given Noel is recovering from an ACL and playing for a historically bad team right now?
Illmatic12 wrote:Disagree on Oladipo, he will be a beast. He's so explosive and draws a lot of fouls, plus plays great defense. His jumper keeps getting smoother just like Wall's did. In a couple years I feel like he's gonna be a Wade-lite at the SG position.
Otto could be a fringe All-Star caliber SF if he hits his ceiling, but he won't have that explosive scoring element that the super elite wings have.
stevemcqueen1 wrote:Illmatic12 wrote:Disagree on Oladipo, he will be a beast. He's so explosive and draws a lot of fouls, plus plays great defense. His jumper keeps getting smoother just like Wall's did. In a couple years I feel like he's gonna be a Wade-lite at the SG position.
Otto could be a fringe All-Star caliber SF if he hits his ceiling, but he won't have that explosive scoring element that the super elite wings have.
You could be right about Oladipo. And I think you're right about Otto's scoring potential. But I don't think Oladipo has that scoring element that elite wings have either. He's a better athlete than Otto. But not by as much as you'd think. And Otto is a lot bigger than him. And Otto's scoring instincts and offensive skill level dwarf Oladipo's IMO. He's a better shooter from all parts of the floor. Oladipo is a more aggressive slasher, but that doesn't make up the gap in their overall effectiveness offensively, and I don't think Oladipo is an aggressive first option scorer by nature. Porter's offensive effectiveness has been astonishing so far. He's just not turning it over or missing shots at all.
The size difference is really at the key difference in value of each IMO. Oladipo is something of a combo guard that's on the short end for a 2. Otto is on the big end for a true wing, and he rebounds well enough and is long enough to eventually play some four. That makes him a real asset at the 3 that I think gives him the potential to actually be a more valuable defensive player than Oladipo as well.
I'd also point to Pierce as an example of what kind of ceiling Porter can have as a scorer. He won't ever be a first option in D.C. like Pierce was for basically his entire tenure in Boston. He won't come close to matching Pierce's volume. But he can be as effective a scorer as Pierce was, using a game predicated on instinct and very advanced offensive skill level too.