Chuck Texas wrote:Reading this thread makes me realize something. Either NY or Dallas got Bizarro Tyson Chandler and the other city got the real guy.
All the things you guys are ripping the guy for not doing are exactly what he brought here the first go-around and has brought back again.
I have some theories:
1. Tyson Chandler fancies himself a leader--especially on the defensive end. Dirk wasn't threatened by this because Dirk has always been more a lead by example guy than a vocal guy. So he was willing to let Chandler be big voice in the locker room. I wonder if that "big voice" didn't go over as well in a Melo-led locker room?
2. You always have to look at the money and we've had him in contract years both times. Of course it doesn't explain him taking the Knicks defense from poor to really good and winning the DPOY immediately after getting paid.
3. Tyson hates losing more than most players. Some Knicks guys appeared to really not give an F last year and I can imagine Tyson probably chewed some guys tails. Fans don't like the angry voice even if ultimately he is correct.
4. Tyson somehow got really bad at basketball for 3 years, but is good again?
There was no bizzaro anything. Tyson was solid here all 3 years. Unfortunately since we did not trust our reserves last season we basically wanted to play Tyson more than he could go for and he was never quite right. Additionally our system was just flat out horrible on defense. Switching on defense led to mismatches EVERY TIME and as a result you had Tyson leaving the paint to cover on the wing. Tyson knows he can't be out on the perimeter. So Chandler was disruptive. It is no coincidence that of the 4 players who were in the dog house with Woodson were Shumpert, Artest, Chandler and Udrih. Of those 4, 3 of them actually are considered GOOD defensive players. They all did not buy into the system at all and thus you have a complete mess.
Chandler was obviously great for us for almost 2 seasons (DPOY, AllStar) but that playoff series vs Indy he was handled. That was when this board really turned on him. Hibbert looked like Shaq and Chandler looked like Brian Grant. Later on it was theorized that Tyson was actually hurt during the series (I believe this was also confirmed).
What you are seeing now is the "real" tyson chandler. However, he has always been a bit immature and requires a cap on his minutes for his energy level to remain high. Right now you guys have a wonderful handcuff in Wright. Combined you have 48 minutes of hustle at center.
I still see the Tyson trade-back as a move made due to parts other than Tyson rather than to remove HIM from the locker room.
Losing Tyson was bad for us, but gaining Calderon can change the culture on offense. Tyson is a finisher and a pick setter. He isn't the guy who makes extra passes and keeps everyone feeling involved. Calderon will help with that atmosphere and that is actually what Phil meant by change in culture. From Felton waddling down, driving and flipping up a floater at a 30% clip to Calderon who comes down and looks to make sure "everyone gonna eat"(thanks amare).