Patriots at Packers
The Patriots listed long snapper Danny Aiken (concussion), guard Dan Connolly (ankle), defensive end Dominique Easley (knee), tackle Cameron Fleming (ankle, finger), defensive end Chandler Jones (hip), wide receiver Brandon LaFell (shoulder), running back Shane Vereen (ankle) and linebacker Chris White (ankle) as questionable. No reason to worry about Tom Brady (ankle), though: He’s probable. Cornerback Jarrett Bush (groin, questionable) and linebacker Nick Perry (shoulder, questionable) are the only injury concerns for the Packers.
I know it's a BB injury report, but the long snapper having to go through the concussion protocol is significant if he can't go.
Pats @ Packers lead up
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,152
- And1: 15,031
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
Hopefully Perry can play.
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2 ... s-week-13/
PFF small preview to the game. If i'm the pack I rush 4 the entire night. Brady already knows he can't trust his O line, no reason bring additional pressure with no deep threat IMO
PFF small preview to the game. If i'm the pack I rush 4 the entire night. Brady already knows he can't trust his O line, no reason bring additional pressure with no deep threat IMO
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,787
- And1: 27,357
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
Why rush 4? Brady has the most trouble when he's under pressure. Obviously getting pressure with just 4 would be ideal but chances are if we're only rushing 4 he's going to be picking us apart all game.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,145
- And1: 107
- Joined: Feb 15, 2007
- Location: san diego
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
Its clear what Pack has to do - Got to stop the run and grab he lead and then tee off.
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
trwi7 wrote:Why rush 4? Brady has the most trouble when he's under pressure. Obviously getting pressure with just 4 would be ideal but chances are if we're only rushing 4 he's going to be picking us apart all game.
Brady's the fastest in the league at getting the ball out of his hands. Most over sacks this year seem to be coverage sacks IMO
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
- Ill-yasova
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,364
- And1: 2,562
- Joined: Jul 13, 2006
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
Dick Dastardly wrote:Replace Hawk with Richardson on passing downs please, or every down.
Actually, that's one of the better ideas I've seen for covering Gronk. He's the closest thing we have to a size/speed matchup outside of Clay.
Sent From My Rotary Phone
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
- Ill-yasova
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,364
- And1: 2,562
- Joined: Jul 13, 2006
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
If Perry plays and we can slide Clay inside I see a win. If not things get a little more dicey. Elliott had a couple pressures last week so I'm hoping for some impact from him too.
Sent From My Rotary Phone
Sent From My Rotary Phone
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
- JK64
- Ballboy
- Posts: 1
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 30, 2014
-
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
I hope Perry can play, he is solid against the run, which I see the Patriots using plenty. I would like to see Bush back too, Special teams will be important today.
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
Rob Demovsky @RobDemovsky 50s51 seconds ago
#Packers inactives:
QB Scott Tolzien
CB Demetri Goodson
LB Carl Bradford
C Garth Gerhart
TE Justin Perillo
WR Jeff Janis
DT Luther Robinson
All good news for us
#Packers inactives:
QB Scott Tolzien
CB Demetri Goodson
LB Carl Bradford
C Garth Gerhart
TE Justin Perillo
WR Jeff Janis
DT Luther Robinson
All good news for us
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
Chander Jones is inactive along with their long snapper.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
Mike Reiss @MikeReiss 2m2 minutes ago
Patriots inactives: CB Malcolm Butler, RB James White, LS Danny Aiken, LB Chris White, G Jordan Devey, OT Cameron Fleming, DE Chandler Jones
Patriots inactives: CB Malcolm Butler, RB James White, LS Danny Aiken, LB Chris White, G Jordan Devey, OT Cameron Fleming, DE Chandler Jones
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
- crkone
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,151
- And1: 9,762
- Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Re: Pats @ Packers lead up
I wonder how their long snapping will be.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |