ImageImageImageImageImage

ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,799
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#1 » by Slava » Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:46 pm

Ramona Shelburne: How often do you two talk?
Jeanie: As necessary. I don't think it has to be every day.
Jim: Jeanie's got multiple departments to cover: TV, the sponsors, just to name two. I have one department to cover. We can talk five times a day for three straight days. And then maybe a week or two will go by before we need to talk. If there's something that's big in basketball operations, then I contact Jeanie. A trade, a situation off the court, those kinds of things.


Jim, you've taken a lot of criticism for some of the decisions the Lakers have made over the years. How have you learned to deal with that?
Jim: We knew we were going to have to deal with the economics of the new collective bargaining agreement. By correcting our situation, it was going to be painful. Unfortunately, on top of correcting we had some severe injuries that knocked top players out for a year at a time. So I accept the responsibility for the criticism. I don't think it's correct, but I accept it. I understand the pain of Lakers fans. I feel the pain of losing too. But I have to focus on how we get out of this. And when I look at the flexibility and the position that we're in, we can't be in a better position to move forward.


Your 2015 first-round pick is owed to Phoenix as part of the Steve Nash trade unless it's in the top five. There is already talk that you should tank to try to keep that pick. How do you respond to that?
Jim: It will never happen here, period. The question is insulting. Our fans understand there's a process. They believe in the process -- the coach, Kobe, the draft pick [Julius Randle] and the flexibility we have going forward.
Jeanie: The teams that use tanking as a strategy are doing damage. If you're in tanking mode, that means you've got young players who you're teaching bad habits to. I think that's unforgivable. If you're tanking and you have young players or you keep a short roster, you're playing guys out of their position or too many minutes, you're risking injury. It's irresponsible and I don't think it belongs in any league.


Ramona Shelburne | ESPN

Interview touches on a variety of subjects including Dr. Buss' influence, tanking, CBA and others. The Phil Jackson snub still appears to be a fresh wound between the two and the alliance seems to be an uneasy one but they do appear eager to present a collective front.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
TonyMontana
RealGM
Posts: 11,726
And1: 398
Joined: Apr 27, 2006
Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
     

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#2 » by TonyMontana » Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:05 pm

Slava wrote:
So I accept the responsibility for the criticism. I don't think it's correct, but I accept it.



This is funny. As an owner you made several bad trades and mistakes which included MDA and we clearly have no future plans that is going to make this team better other than the lottery and Kobe coming off the books. Who does the blame fall on but the owner and the G.M. And it clearly shows you dont think you should be blamed for it. Again who is to blame?
Image
User avatar
gotokyo
Rookie
Posts: 1,150
And1: 283
Joined: Feb 29, 2012

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#3 » by gotokyo » Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:16 pm

Can we get a definitive year on Jimmy's 4 year contention guarantee? Still unsure if he meant 4 years from when he mentioned it in the interview, or 4 years since he took over basketball operations.


These are the questions we should be asking.
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,252
And1: 9,956
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#4 » by TyCobb » Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:36 pm

Great interview.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
User avatar
crazyeights
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,923
And1: 2,231
Joined: Dec 27, 2005
 

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#5 » by crazyeights » Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:01 pm

Good stuff.

Odd that this article says it was published October 14th...but Ramona recently quoted it in the response to the recent Magic quotes....

If this was from a previous issue of ESPN Mag, I find it weird that we never heard about it--because it's a joint interview with Jim and Jeanie is important for the face of the franchise.

It should have happened a year ago, but it sounds like they were both legitimately hurt about the Phil Jackson situation.
User avatar
BEazy
RealGM
Posts: 10,101
And1: 2,497
Joined: Aug 06, 2010
     

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#6 » by BEazy » Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:37 pm

Why they picked Nash to build around instead of Howard is beyond me...I'll never understand that...ever....
Image

Long Live The Black Mamba. Kobe Bean Bryant Laker For Life. 8/24
User avatar
Mamba Venom
RealGM
Posts: 17,979
And1: 582
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: California
Contact:

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#7 » by Mamba Venom » Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:18 pm

ScHoolBoy B wrote:Why they picked Nash to build around instead of Howard is beyond me...I'll never understand that...ever....


The reasons are:
(a) the 2004 Peyton Malone team
(b) Jimmy not wanting to let fan favorite Phil take over his job (being overpowered if Phil and Jeanie thought Jimmy was the problem w/ Dad not there to balance it)

It was the largest mistake in franchise history. They owed it to Kobe to get Phil. They owed it to Phil to chose him over D'Antonie. They owed it to Dwight who use to focus on DFense to get Phil. Jimmy said it was his Dad's choice but I don't believe it. I think Jimmy has some issues. And I would rather have Phil and D-Fish (as an assistant) be part of the Lakers than the Knicks.
Lakers are 22-3 in OT last 6 seasons:Kobe best OT closer!
User avatar
kblo247
RealGM
Posts: 13,834
And1: 2,131
Joined: Apr 16, 2011

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#8 » by kblo247 » Sat Dec 13, 2014 1:18 am

Mamba Venom wrote:
ScHoolBoy B wrote:Why they picked Nash to build around instead of Howard is beyond me...I'll never understand that...ever....


The reasons are:
(a) the 2004 Peyton Malone team
(b) Jimmy not wanting to let fan favorite Phil take over his job (being overpowered if Phil and Jeanie thought Jimmy was the problem w/ Dad not there to balance it)

It was the largest mistake in franchise history. They owed it to Kobe to get Phil. They owed it to Phil to chose him over D'Antonie. They owed it to Dwight who use to focus on DFense to get Phil. Jimmy said it was his Dad's choice but I don't believe it. I think Jimmy has some issues. And I would rather have Phil and D-Fish (as an assistant) be part of the Lakers than the Knicks.

I don't solely blame jimmy. Jerry wasted part of Kobe's prime, two years of ohils genius, and all because he wanted to try and recreate show time with Rudy t before. The fascination with Showtime to me is silly but it's always been there; the triangle has won more historically than that way, and the league just isn't built for Showtime anymore
Image
User avatar
Sofa King
RealGM
Posts: 19,352
And1: 3,044
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#9 » by Sofa King » Sat Dec 13, 2014 2:55 am

“On top,” Buss told ESPN in a joint interview conducted in October with his sister, owner and President Jeanie Buss.

"I'm looking to him to make it happen, so I'd like to hear about that," Jeanie Buss said in response.

"The pitch is we can go for two max players. And we have room to solidify the team with others," Jim Buss said. "We can't sell who we're going to get because we don't know yet, and it's illegal to do that. We pursued LeBron James and Carmelo Anthony last summer."

"Every free agent is unique and different. I don't think they're going to be in the same position or make the same decisions as those two players did. So I'm excited about free agency coming up in the next two or three years."

http://www.latimes.com/sports/lakers/la ... story.html


"I was laying myself on the line by saying, if this doesn’t work in three to four years, if we’re not back on the top — and the definition of top means contending for the Western Conference, contending for a championship — then I will step down because that means I have failed."
Jim Buss
April 20, 2014

http://jimbusscountdown.tumblr.com/
Laker_Kid
Starter
Posts: 2,122
And1: 591
Joined: May 25, 2014
 

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#10 » by Laker_Kid » Sat Dec 13, 2014 5:45 am

man. f**k the pick. there, i said it. if we lose every game but we at least competed, fine, at least we have the pick. but i will never wish for it if it meant having to tank and settle for mediocrity. like jeanie said, that sort of losing mentality isn't the way to re/build the team.
User avatar
Sofa King
RealGM
Posts: 19,352
And1: 3,044
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#11 » by Sofa King » Sat Dec 13, 2014 6:42 am

Laker_Kid wrote:man. f**k the pick. there, i said it. if we lose every game but we at least competed, fine, at least we have the pick. but i will never wish for it if it meant having to tank and settle for mediocrity. like jeanie said, that sort of losing mentality isn't the way to re/build the team.

I totally agree. I rather see the team fighting and competing and showing some heart out there. The moment you tank, you're the Clippers Franchise.
User avatar
TylersLakers
RealGM
Posts: 10,961
And1: 2,867
Joined: Jan 20, 2006
Location: Winnipeg Canada
     

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#12 » by TylersLakers » Sun Dec 14, 2014 4:18 am

Good interview. I totally trust Jeanie Buss to get this franchise in the right direction. If things aren't going well, she's not going to sit on her hands.
Image
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,799
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#13 » by Slava » Sun Dec 14, 2014 6:55 am

I really don't, I think the family should step away from basketball operations and let the gm handle all of it.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#14 » by DEEP3CL » Sun Dec 14, 2014 7:33 am

Slava wrote:I really don't, I think the family should step away from basketball operations and let the gm handle all of it.
Or they can give Larry Ellison ($50 B strong ), Eli Broad($7 B) or David Geffen($6.8 B) a call....you know what I'm say'in ?
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,799
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#15 » by Slava » Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:24 pm

DEEP3CL wrote:
Slava wrote:I really don't, I think the family should step away from basketball operations and let the gm handle all of it.
Or they can give Larry Ellison ($50 B strong ), Eli Broad($7 B) or David Geffen($6.8 B) a call....you know what I'm say'in ?


You can't get better owners than them. They spend as much as you want for a winning team and don't meddle too much with the professional side. If only Jimmy took a break and either let Mitch be the boss or handle the head of basketball operations to someone like Jerry West if Mitch asks for it, we'd be more than fine.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
MAMBAEMD
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,022
And1: 1,696
Joined: May 16, 2007
       

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#16 » by MAMBAEMD » Mon Dec 15, 2014 3:45 am

Slava wrote:
DEEP3CL wrote:
Slava wrote:I really don't, I think the family should step away from basketball operations and let the gm handle all of it.
Or they can give Larry Ellison ($50 B strong ), Eli Broad($7 B) or David Geffen($6.8 B) a call....you know what I'm say'in ?


You can't get better owners than them. They spend as much as you want for a winning team and don't meddle too much with the professional side. If only Jimmy took a break and either let Mitch be the boss or handle the head of basketball operations to someone like Jerry West if Mitch asks for it, we'd be more than fine.


Totally agree!
I would much rather the Lakers stay in the hands of the Buss family, who have made some mistakes, but that their heart and soul is in the Lakers and basketball.
I cringe at the idea that some businessman like Ellison or Broad taking over the Lakers.
Formerly lakerRD
dipstick
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,920
And1: 218
Joined: Aug 31, 2001
     

Re: ESPN interview with Jimmy & Jeanie Buss 

Post#17 » by dipstick » Mon Dec 15, 2014 4:05 am

Jeanie: The teams that use tanking as a strategy are doing damage. If you're in tanking mode, that means you've got young players who you're teaching bad habits to. I think that's unforgivable. If you're tanking and you have young players or you keep a short roster, you're playing guys out of their position or too many minutes, you're risking injury. It's irresponsible and I don't think it belongs in any league.


That is a point I was trying to make until I realized that we don't have too many players that we should keep that will retain those bad habits. But if Julius wasn't injured, very valid point, at least in my opinion.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers


cron