ImageImage

Trade Targets (postcript on yesterday-other teams)

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

Chuck Diesel
RealGM
Posts: 17,587
And1: 11,556
Joined: May 23, 2004

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#661 » by Chuck Diesel » Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:03 am

AussieBuck wrote:
Chuck Diesel wrote:Wonder what it would take to get Nurkic. I'd explore everything other than our golden 2.

He's a monster in the post, do you think his D will develop better than Pek's has?


100%. Quicker feet, longer arms & better defensive instincts. In the limited minutes he's gotten he's already blocking shots at a much higher rate than Pek. I think conditioning will be Nurkic's biggest hurdle. I'd love to get him to Milwaukee and see what he does with 20 minutes every night for the rest of his rookie season.
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,066
And1: 7,488
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#662 » by Badgerlander » Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:33 pm

Village Idiot wrote:T-Rob is probably available, despite getting the start against you and looking really good. T-Rob for Henson is a deal I'd like to see as a Portland fan.


TRob is awful, no way I'd do that deal. Henson for McCollum straight up seems pretty fair for both teams.
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,066
And1: 7,488
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#663 » by Badgerlander » Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:35 pm

Chuck Diesel wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
Chuck Diesel wrote:Wonder what it would take to get Nurkic. I'd explore everything other than our golden 2.

He's a monster in the post, do you think his D will develop better than Pek's has?


100%. Quicker feet, longer arms & better defensive instincts. In the limited minutes he's gotten he's already blocking shots at a much higher rate than Pek. I think conditioning will be Nurkic's biggest hurdle. I'd love to get him to Milwaukee and see what he does with 20 minutes every night for the rest of his rookie season.


Nurkic is fun to watch but for Kidds system we need a Center that can hit the cutter, the jumper, or drive from the high post.
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Village Idiot
General Manager
Posts: 9,550
And1: 2,252
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
   

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#664 » by Village Idiot » Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:37 pm

DocHoliday wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:T-Rob is probably available, despite getting the start against you and looking really good. T-Rob for Henson is a deal I'd like to see as a Portland fan.


TRob is awful, no way I'd do that deal. Henson for McCollum straight up seems pretty fair for both teams.
It's probably fair but I get the impression our front-office values McCollum highly. If they didn't we would have probably traded him to acquire Spencer Hawes at the last deadline or Aron Afflalo on draft-day.
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,066
And1: 7,488
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#665 » by Badgerlander » Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:39 pm

Village Idiot wrote:
DocHoliday wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:T-Rob is probably available, despite getting the start against you and looking really good. T-Rob for Henson is a deal I'd like to see as a Portland fan.


TRob is awful, no way I'd do that deal. Henson for McCollum straight up seems pretty fair for both teams.
It's probably fair but I get the impression our front-office values McCollum highly. If they didn't we would have probably traded him to acquire Spencer Hawes at the last deadline or Aron Afflalo on draft-day.


Yeah I like McCollum a lot but I'm sure that they'll hang onto him at least until after Wes is resigned. He fits Stotts system perfectly but I think he's strictly a PG and there are only so many minutes in Portland behind Lillard.
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Village Idiot
General Manager
Posts: 9,550
And1: 2,252
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
   

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#666 » by Village Idiot » Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:58 pm

DocHoliday wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:
DocHoliday wrote:
TRob is awful, no way I'd do that deal. Henson for McCollum straight up seems pretty fair for both teams.
It's probably fair but I get the impression our front-office values McCollum highly. If they didn't we would have probably traded him to acquire Spencer Hawes at the last deadline or Aron Afflalo on draft-day.


Yeah I like McCollum a lot but I'm sure that they'll hang onto him at least until after Wes is resigned. He fits Stotts system perfectly but I think he's strictly a PG and there are only so many minutes in Portland behind Lillard.
CJ doesn't have the court vision to play the point although he is a very good ball-handler and extremely crafty with the ball. Very skillled, unselfish, cerebral player that any coach would love to have but who will never be a star.

He's more like a better shooting, better decision making version of Jerryd Bayless but perhaps a bit less athletic.
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,066
And1: 7,488
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#667 » by Badgerlander » Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:02 pm

Village Idiot wrote:
DocHoliday wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:It's probably fair but I get the impression our front-office values McCollum highly. If they didn't we would have probably traded him to acquire Spencer Hawes at the last deadline or Aron Afflalo on draft-day.


Yeah I like McCollum a lot but I'm sure that they'll hang onto him at least until after Wes is resigned. He fits Stotts system perfectly but I think he's strictly a PG and there are only so many minutes in Portland behind Lillard.
CJ doesn't have the court vision to play the point although he is a very good ball-handler and extremely crafty with the ball. Very skillled, unselfish, cerebral player that any coach would love to have but who will never be a star.

He's more like a better shooting, better decision making version of Jerryd Bayless but perhaps a bit less athletic.


I mean right now we have Knight as our starting PG and he has less vision than Bayless. With as much as Giannis and Parker are going to handle the ball we need a PG with a better shot selection, a good spot up shooter, smart defender, and can run a competent PnR once in a while.
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
eagle13
Head Coach
Posts: 6,145
And1: 107
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: san diego

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#668 » by eagle13 » Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:24 pm

TWO TRADES
knight zaza ersan mayo – NO - Holiday Ajinca Gordon
&
1st-LAC, Henson JOB Dudley – DEN - Hickson Nurkic Gee-E

ROSTER
sanders / nurkic / ajinca
giannis / hickson
middleton / gee / ingliss
bayless / gordon
holiday / marshall-E / wolters
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,983
And1: 1,996
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#669 » by Treebeard » Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:41 pm

DocHoliday wrote:
Chuck Diesel wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:He's a monster in the post, do you think his D will develop better than Pek's has?


100%. Quicker feet, longer arms & better defensive instincts. In the limited minutes he's gotten he's already blocking shots at a much higher rate than Pek. I think conditioning will be Nurkic's biggest hurdle. I'd love to get him to Milwaukee and see what he does with 20 minutes every night for the rest of his rookie season.


Nurkic is fun to watch but for Kidds system we need a Center that can hit the cutter, the jumper, or drive from the high post.


That sounds more like Zaza - of six-seven years ago - and not so much of Larry - or Zaza - of today....
*******************************************************
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 26,261
And1: 30,380
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#670 » by Ron Swanson » Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:41 pm

I don't really get why people can have such a low opinion of Brandon Knight, yet then be clamoring to deal for a guy like CJ McCollum. He's a poor man's version and 3 months older than Knight. Unless the entire premise is that you just want the guy that has 2 more years on a rookie deal?

I feel indifferent on a Henson for T-Rob trade. Robinson is pretty bad, but he's also younger than Henson and is more explosive. Greater potential but I don't think either guy is ever going to be anything special, the only strength I can say about either is that they are good rebounders. T-Rob has bounced around the league and gotten enough chances to convince me that he just isn't that talented of a player.
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,066
And1: 7,488
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#671 » by Badgerlander » Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:45 pm

Treebeard wrote:
DocHoliday wrote:
Chuck Diesel wrote:
100%. Quicker feet, longer arms & better defensive instincts. In the limited minutes he's gotten he's already blocking shots at a much higher rate than Pek. I think conditioning will be Nurkic's biggest hurdle. I'd love to get him to Milwaukee and see what he does with 20 minutes every night for the rest of his rookie season.


Nurkic is fun to watch but for Kidds system we need a Center that can hit the cutter, the jumper, or drive from the high post.


That sounds more like Zaza - of six-seven years ago - and not so much of Larry - or Zaza - of today....


Which is why Zaza is getting more playing time than Larry right now. Zaza is the perfect guy to teach somebody like O'Quinn if we could get our hands on him.
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,753
And1: 42,831
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#672 » by ReasonablySober » Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:57 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:I don't really get why people can have such a low opinion of Brandon Knight, yet then be clamoring to deal for a guy like CJ McCollum. He's a poor man's version and 3 months older than Knight. Unless the entire premise is that you just want the guy that has 2 more years on a rookie deal?

I feel indifferent on a Henson for T-Rob trade. Robinson is pretty bad, but he's also younger than Henson and is more explosive. Greater potential but I don't think either guy is ever going to be anything special, the only strength I can say about either is that they are good rebounders. T-Rob has bounced around the league and gotten enough chances to convince me that he just isn't that talented of a player.


I'm completely indifferent to McCollum, but the contract issue is huge. At least with McCollum you get a couple years to see if he improves with an increased role.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 26,261
And1: 30,380
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#673 » by Ron Swanson » Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:20 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:I don't really get why people can have such a low opinion of Brandon Knight, yet then be clamoring to deal for a guy like CJ McCollum. He's a poor man's version and 3 months older than Knight. Unless the entire premise is that you just want the guy that has 2 more years on a rookie deal?

I feel indifferent on a Henson for T-Rob trade. Robinson is pretty bad, but he's also younger than Henson and is more explosive. Greater potential but I don't think either guy is ever going to be anything special, the only strength I can say about either is that they are good rebounders. T-Rob has bounced around the league and gotten enough chances to convince me that he just isn't that talented of a player.


I'm completely indifferent to McCollum, but the contract issue is huge. At least with McCollum you get a couple years to see if he improves with an increased role.


Fair enough. Crabbe is the guy on Portland that interests me more. He's shooting on very good efficiency and is on a 2nd round rookie contract for this year and next. I'd see if they'd do a Wolters or Marshall for Crabbe swap straight up. They could use a young true PG for the future as well as the present with Steve Blake not playing that well.
User avatar
tski1972
Head Coach
Posts: 6,325
And1: 3,784
Joined: May 24, 2011
Location: Wow-saw, WI
Contact:
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#674 » by tski1972 » Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:37 pm

Crabbe = Middleton
http://twitter.com/MarkIsOld

Image

"Because of Giannis, the once lousy Bucks are back in the NBA conversation." - 60 Minutes
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 26,261
And1: 30,380
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#675 » by Ron Swanson » Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:43 pm

tski1972 wrote:Crabbe = Middleton


He's more of a 2-guard than Middleton and he's under contract for next year. Two 23 year-olds that can shoot is never a bad thing.
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,066
And1: 7,488
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#676 » by Badgerlander » Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:04 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:I don't really get why people can have such a low opinion of Brandon Knight, yet then be clamoring to deal for a guy like CJ McCollum. He's a poor man's version and 3 months older than Knight. Unless the entire premise is that you just want the guy that has 2 more years on a rookie deal?

I feel indifferent on a Henson for T-Rob trade. Robinson is pretty bad, but he's also younger than Henson and is more explosive. Greater potential but I don't think either guy is ever going to be anything special, the only strength I can say about either is that they are good rebounders. T-Rob has bounced around the league and gotten enough chances to convince me that he just isn't that talented of a player.


I like McCollum because I think he's a better player than Knight, better shot selection, better shooter, makes better decisions. It's tough to compare them because McCollum isn't starting but I think he can do everything that Knight can without all of the things that I don't like about Knight.

TRob is explosive but he looks smaller than Wes Matthews on the court, can't defend anyone in the post aside from trying to block a shot and he can't shoot. He's a smaller Adrien with more ups and no jumper. Henson at least has the length to defend the rim and score over Centers.
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,066
And1: 7,488
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#677 » by Badgerlander » Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:14 pm

Basically I think McCollum is Nate with a jumper


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,175
And1: 41,743
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#678 » by emunney » Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:31 pm

tski1972 wrote:Crabbe = Middleton


Similar level players but there are some pretty key differences between them. Crabbe isn't lost in transition and is a better passer in general but particularly on the move. He has some PnR potential. Big time up and down guy emotionally, though, and can sleep through a game if he doesn't like what's going on.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
machu46
RealGM
Posts: 11,069
And1: 4,402
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: DC
       

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#679 » by machu46 » Thu Dec 18, 2014 5:08 pm

DocHoliday wrote:
Treebeard wrote:
DocHoliday wrote:
Nurkic is fun to watch but for Kidds system we need a Center that can hit the cutter, the jumper, or drive from the high post.


That sounds more like Zaza - of six-seven years ago - and not so much of Larry - or Zaza - of today....


Which is why Zaza is getting more playing time than Larry right now. Zaza is the perfect guy to teach somebody like O'Quinn if we could get our hands on him.


Yeah, my original objective with starting this thread was to find guys like O'Quinn. I think it's pretty clear that Kidd wants a big man like a Marc Gasol rather than the mold of what Larry could become. O'Quinn seems like a really good guy to target and I would 100% get behind it if we made a move for him.
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,175
And1: 41,743
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#680 » by emunney » Thu Dec 18, 2014 5:53 pm

Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts

Return to Milwaukee Bucks