ImageImageImageImageImage

Milwaukee's in Sacramento (Game Thread)

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,574
And1: 3,306
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: Milwaukee's in Sacramento (Game Thread) 

Post#41 » by blind prophet » Fri Dec 19, 2014 9:02 am

Wonder if Sessions if the first player to go -20 in a 1 point loss?
Jkam31
Head Coach
Posts: 6,867
And1: 5,833
Joined: Feb 23, 2014

Re: Milwaukee's in Sacramento (Game Thread) 

Post#42 » by Jkam31 » Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:55 pm

City of Trees wrote:
RIPskaterdude wrote:
City of Trees wrote:Good game. Really like the potential of the Cousins - Gay - McLemore core..... Wish they would have found more shots for Ben, he was on fire. Cuz at 80% is a double-double. Kings will be fine. I'd lighten up on this loss if I were you. I see a lot of wins in the future.

Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app


Explain to me how this was a good game? The Bucks were coming off a game last night, lost 2 of their starters and easily 4 of their top 8 players and we lost at home. Because we only lost by 1? We should have beat them by 10+ without Cousins
lazy typing. It was a good/fun game to watch at the end.

Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app


You sound like PDA fun to watch not about wins.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: Milwaukee's in Sacramento (Game Thread) 

Post#43 » by City of Trees » Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:53 pm

Jkam31 wrote:
City of Trees wrote:
RIPskaterdude wrote:
Explain to me how this was a good game? The Bucks were coming off a game last night, lost 2 of their starters and easily 4 of their top 8 players and we lost at home. Because we only lost by 1? We should have beat them by 10+ without Cousins
lazy typing. It was a good/fun game to watch at the end.

Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app


You sound like PDA fun to watch not about wins.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
No my expectations for this team are realistic.

Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app
bleeds_purple
Analyst
Posts: 3,530
And1: 1,809
Joined: May 22, 2014

Re: Milwaukee's in Sacramento (Game Thread) 

Post#44 » by bleeds_purple » Fri Dec 19, 2014 7:44 pm

Towards the end of the quarter there were two plays that seriously troubled me. On the first Demarcus set a screen for Rudy and was wide open on a pop on the right side of the floor in his sweet spot for a jumper, only Rudy had his head down in ISO mode, granted he did hit a three point shot. Demarcus threw his hands up in disgust and he and Rudy were jawing on way down the floor and into the next defensive possession and it seemed like Rudy was telling Demarcus he should have cut. The next offensive possession Demarcus returned the favor and ball hogged it into a wild shot.

I could see things really coming off the rails here soon if we don't bring in a real coach.

Ostensibly PDA/Vivek wants us to run a small ball lineup (and I suppose Malone wanted a more pound it in team) only we don't have the personnel for it. I feel like I'm watching the 49ers season all over again. The team was always meant to be a time of possession power run team only management/coaching thought it would be a good idea to run five wide half the time. Look how that turned out. I really felt we were building a Grizzlies-like personality under Malone on this team with a power post up team - looks like were going to see a lot of 2 PG; 3 guard; no PF lineups.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Milwaukee's in Sacramento (Game Thread) 

Post#45 » by SacKingZZZ » Sat Dec 20, 2014 12:31 am

It will take a minute for Rudy to get back out of the mentality that he is the teams only hope. The team has played much differently the last 10 games so hopefully they'll adjust back to some of the play they were used to before that sooner than later.

I'm still not totally sold that Vivek specifically wants a small ball team. He's never even mentioned that IIRC. At least not as the foundation of anything specifically and there isn't a team in the NBA that doesn't throw out small ball units from time to time. He's said he wants the team to play a more open style that gets the most out of the talent this team has. I can't blame him. I thought it was Malone behind the Cuz can average 5 assists a game talk, but I think it was Vivek and Pete, and if it was, they are right. First game back Cousins went full on Webber. Need to see more of that.

Return to Sacramento Kings