Kings deal:
Jason Thompson, Derrick Williams, Reggie Evans and Ramon Sessions
Kings receive:
Deron Williams, Mason Plumlee*, Brandon Davies*, Tony Mitchell*
Pistons deal:
Brandon Jennings, Tony Mitchell
Pistons receive:
Ramon Sessions, Derrick Williams
Nets deal:
Deron Williams, Mason Plumlee, Brandon Davies, Tony Mitchell
Nets receive:
Brandon Jennings, Jason Thompson, Reggie Evans
*Denotes players absorbed via TPE
Kings make a splashy move
Nets shed about 5 million instantly and multiple millions later while obtaining a starting caliber PG and a good rotational big man. I think the Nets save tens of millions of dollars over the course of Deron's contract by doing this deal.
Pistons shed dollars now and turn the reigns over to R.J. Augisession at PG.
Kings - Pistons - Nets
Moderators: loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, BullyKing, MoneyTalks41890, Trader_Joe
Kings - Pistons - Nets
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,620
- And1: 695
- Joined: Mar 01, 2006
- Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: Kings - Pistons - Nets
- CBFAlex
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,160
- And1: 69
- Joined: Dec 01, 2013
Re: Kings - Pistons - Nets
I don't see Brooklyn giving up plumlee for that
Re: Kings - Pistons - Nets
-
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 45,496
- And1: 26,047
- Joined: Jun 29, 2006
Re: Kings - Pistons - Nets
This is worse for Brooklyn than the deal they are currently rejecting.
Re: Kings - Pistons - Nets
- Mr Peanut
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,669
- And1: 2,833
- Joined: Jan 29, 2012
- Location: New Zealand
Re: Kings - Pistons - Nets
From Detroit's end, would do it in a heartbeat. Don't think Brooklyn are willing to ship Mason out though.
Re: Kings - Pistons - Nets
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,620
- And1: 695
- Joined: Mar 01, 2006
- Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: Kings - Pistons - Nets
I don't see how Brooklyn moves williams without some greasing of the wheels. Plumlee is that grease
Re: Kings - Pistons - Nets
- Laimbeer
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,822
- And1: 14,505
- Joined: Aug 12, 2009
- Location: Cabin Creek
Re: Kings - Pistons - Nets
The Nets attaching Plumlee to move a contract like Williams is not unreasonable.
Re: Kings - Pistons - Nets
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 29,174
- And1: 3,948
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Re: Kings - Pistons - Nets
Brooklyn won't do it as its worse than the rumored deal.
Like it or not Plumlee isn't being moved.
If the Nets are moving D.Will it means they have decided to give up, save money and think about the future. They want to get younger, more athletic and have affordable role players to have in 2016. Thus why would they move a young, cheap, athletic role player who is arguably their best asset (sadly too)? If they were still about the now...yes I can see Plumlee being moved, but they are not.
Also Brooklyn doesn't have to trade D.Will. They are better suited waiting a year when he only has one nore season or using him as a giant expiring in 2016 than to sell of their only decent young assets to save money and get worse.
Like it or not Plumlee isn't being moved.
If the Nets are moving D.Will it means they have decided to give up, save money and think about the future. They want to get younger, more athletic and have affordable role players to have in 2016. Thus why would they move a young, cheap, athletic role player who is arguably their best asset (sadly too)? If they were still about the now...yes I can see Plumlee being moved, but they are not.
Also Brooklyn doesn't have to trade D.Will. They are better suited waiting a year when he only has one nore season or using him as a giant expiring in 2016 than to sell of their only decent young assets to save money and get worse.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
Return to Trades and Transactions