ImageImageImageImageImage

Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,707
And1: 5,275
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1821 » by tontoz » Tue Jan 6, 2015 3:11 am

Jackson isn't going anywhere.

The Cleveland Cavaliers, New York Knicks and Oklahoma City Thunder engineered a multi-faceted six-player trade Monday night, sources told ESPN.com.

As part of the deal, Dion Waiters will go to the Thunder, J.R. Smith and Iman Shumpert would go to the Cavs and three players with nonguaranteed contracts -- Alex Kirk and Lou Amundson from the Cavs and Lance Thomas from the Thunder -- would go to the Knicks. As part of the deal, the Thunder are sending a protected future first-round pick to the Cavs and the Cavs are sending their 2019 second-round pick to the Knicks, sources said.

[+] EnlargeJ.R. Smith
AP Photo/Tony Dejak
J.R. Smith, left, and Dion Waiters are both on the move in a three-team deal that also involves the Thunder, according to sources.
The Thunder are sending a protected 2015 first-round pick to Cleveland in the trade. The Cavs will get the pick if it falls outside the top 18 this year or if it falls outside the top 15 in 2016 or '17. If it doesn't convey in any of those years, it becomes two second-round picks, according to sources.


http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/12125 ... ty-thunder
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,393
And1: 6,796
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1822 » by TGW » Tue Jan 6, 2015 3:15 am

Horrid trade for Cleveland. Not sure why they would get rid of one malcontent and pick up another. Ridiculous.

Decent trade for the Knicks—they continue to gas up the tank.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,350
And1: 7,453
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1823 » by FAH1223 » Tue Jan 6, 2015 5:26 am

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:I was wrong about Josh Smith ... and I'm going to walk to the edge of the cliff one more time:

JR AND SHUMP IF HEALTHY WILL MAKE CLEVELAND VERY DANGEROUS.

Explosive scorer, Smith. Shump seems damaged, but was a formidable player on a 50+win Knicks team just a couple seasons ago.


CLE got a protected 1st rounder from OKC

Now they have some ammo to try and get a big man. They really want Mozgov but Denver isn't budging. Yusuf Nurkic might get handed the starting job if a trade goes through.

They also want Koufos from the Grizzlies but that trade makes zero sense for MEM. They need him for depth behind Gasol.
Image
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,591
And1: 23,056
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1824 » by nate33 » Tue Jan 6, 2015 5:36 am

TGW wrote:Horrid trade for Cleveland. Not sure why they would get rid of one malcontent and pick up another. Ridiculous.

Decent trade for the Knicks—they continue to gas up the tank.

I dunno. Shumpert might really help them. They need a wing defender who doesn't take shots from Irving, Love and LeBron.
WallWithTheDime
Banned User
Posts: 620
And1: 111
Joined: Jan 18, 2014

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1825 » by WallWithTheDime » Tue Jan 6, 2015 1:27 pm

Awwww, what happened to Waiters being the better back court with Kyrie and Waiters, guess not now hahahahahah
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1826 » by Ruzious » Tue Jan 6, 2015 3:04 pm

The trade probably can't hurt Cleveland, but I'm not sure it's going to help them much unless Shumpert understands and accepts his role. I have no faith in JR Smith having the discipline to help Cleve. Shumpert's got to understand he's strictly a 3 and D player. If he's not wide open - just pass the ball to an all-star teammate. His only shots should be open 3's and fast break dunks.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1827 » by fishercob » Tue Jan 6, 2015 3:38 pm

nate33 wrote:
TGW wrote:Horrid trade for Cleveland. Not sure why they would get rid of one malcontent and pick up another. Ridiculous.

Decent trade for the Knicks—they continue to gas up the tank.

I dunno. Shumpert might really help them. They need a wing defender who doesn't take shots from Irving, Love and LeBron.


Yeah it will be interesting to see if they sign him long term this summer or if he takes the QO. He's a really good theoretical fit there and the pick is a nice asset to help them down the road.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
User avatar
sashae
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,347
And1: 94
Joined: Dec 15, 2003
Location: nyc
     

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1828 » by sashae » Tue Jan 6, 2015 3:55 pm

I watch a LOT of Knicks being in NY, and I think that Shump has a lot of potential to be a good player. The last couple of years in NY have been a total mess, and his confidence has been shot. When he's playing within himself, and with confidence he looks like a really useful player. I hope the framework in CLE allows him to do that -- a real defensive stopper off the bench, energy guy.
ernie grunfeld: the perpetual dumpster fire of general management
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,564
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1829 » by gambitx777 » Tue Jan 6, 2015 5:02 pm

I don't know why OKC did this? I mean I really thought that going after Brandon Bass / Brandon Wright would have been clutch for them. I don't see what waiters does for them. . . ? I mean what's the point.... I think it's brilliant for the nicks, The dump Smith, get a second round pick and the get Lance Thomas and Alex Kirk. They Cut Dalembert and they will cut Lou at some point, so they will have an open spot and trade exceptions to absorb a contract before the dead line. It was decent for the cav's cuz they dump a chemistry problem. Shumpert should fall in to his roll there with better team leaders around and a new situation. I look for them to flip Smith for a center at some point, possibly with that first that they got.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,591
And1: 23,056
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1830 » by nate33 » Tue Jan 6, 2015 5:11 pm

gambitx777 wrote:I don't know why OKC did this? I mean I really thought that going after Brandon Bass / Brandon Wright would have been clutch for them. I don't see what waiters does for them. . . ? I mean what's the point.... I think it's brilliant for the nicks, The dump Smith, get a second round pick and the get Lance Thomas and Alex Kirk. They Cut Dalembert and they will cut Lou at some point, so they will have an open spot and trade exceptions to absorb a contract before the dead line. It was decent for the cav's cuz they dump a chemistry problem. Shumpert should fall in to his roll there with better team leaders around and a new situation. I look for them to flip Smith for a center at some point, possibly with that first that they got.

The only rationale I can see for OKC is that they have built an offense that's basically set up for Durant and Westbrook to create looks for themselves by going one-on-one, and everyone else just crashes the boards or spots up for 3. Maybe Waiters would be the guy to run the "offense" for the 2nd unit when Westbrook and Durant are out. Waiters is another one-on-one shot jacker (albeit without the efficiency of Durant and Westbrook).

Overall, it has big potential to blow up in their face. I'm hoping Durant gets sick of watching Westbrook and Waiters take a lot of bad shots.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,564
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1831 » by gambitx777 » Tue Jan 6, 2015 6:25 pm

nate33 wrote:The only rationale I can see for OKC is that they have built an offense that's basically set up for Durant and Westbrook to create looks for themselves by going one-on-one, and everyone else just crashes the boards or spots up for 3. Maybe Waiters would be the guy to run the "offense" for the 2nd unit when Westbrook and Durant are out. Waiters is another one-on-one shot jacker (albeit without the efficiency of Durant and Westbrook).

Overall, it has big potential to blow up in their face. I'm hoping Durant gets sick of watching Westbrook and Waiters take a lot of bad shots.

Let me know if you agree or not, it just seems to me that OKC is not going all in for this season. Up grading that front is needed, going out and getting a young starting 2, who just so happens to be a chuck shooter, not needed. It almost seems like they want to play it safe, like they have no urgency to win now, almost like they don't expect him to leave? Which we all know if he sees a better chance to win, he's gone.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,591
And1: 23,056
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1832 » by nate33 » Tue Jan 6, 2015 6:31 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
nate33 wrote:The only rationale I can see for OKC is that they have built an offense that's basically set up for Durant and Westbrook to create looks for themselves by going one-on-one, and everyone else just crashes the boards or spots up for 3. Maybe Waiters would be the guy to run the "offense" for the 2nd unit when Westbrook and Durant are out. Waiters is another one-on-one shot jacker (albeit without the efficiency of Durant and Westbrook).

Overall, it has big potential to blow up in their face. I'm hoping Durant gets sick of watching Westbrook and Waiters take a lot of bad shots.

Let me know if you agree or not, it just seems to me that OKC is not going all in for this season. Up grading that front is needed, going out and getting a young starting 2, who just so happens to be a chuck shooter, not needed. It almost seems like they want to play it safe, like they have no urgency to win now, almost like they don't expect him to leave? Which we all know if he sees a better chance to win, he's gone.

I think you make a valid point. Why go after a guy who hasn't yet reach his prime unless they're thinking about reloading for the future? There had to be better "win now" trade options on the table.
nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,310
And1: 2,468
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1833 » by nuposse04 » Tue Jan 6, 2015 6:38 pm

Oddly the only real winners I think might be the knicks. More developmental minutes for Hardaway and Early. I also don't know how much of a shut down player Shumpert really is. I always though a significant portion of that was media hype, don't know what the data says in the last 2 seasons about em.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,680
And1: 4,550
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1834 » by closg00 » Tue Jan 6, 2015 8:37 pm

Hassan Whiteside is looking like good snatch from the D-League for the Heat.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/4764/
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,902
And1: 10,483
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1835 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Tue Jan 6, 2015 10:18 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:I was wrong about Josh Smith ... and I'm going to walk to the edge of the cliff one more time:

JR AND SHUMP IF HEALTHY WILL MAKE CLEVELAND VERY DANGEROUS.

Explosive scorer, Smith. Shump seems damaged, but was a formidable player on a 50+win Knicks team just a couple seasons ago.


CLE got a protected 1st rounder from OKC

Now they have some ammo to try and get a big man. They really want Mozgov but Denver isn't budging. Yusuf Nurkic might get handed the starting job if a trade goes through.

They also want Koufos from the Grizzlies but that trade makes zero sense for MEM. They need him for depth behind Gasol.


What will they give up for Kevin Seraphin?
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
dobrojim
RealGM
Posts: 16,994
And1: 4,147
Joined: Sep 16, 2004

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1836 » by dobrojim » Tue Jan 6, 2015 10:28 pm

WallWithTheDime wrote:Awwww, what happened to Waiters being the better back court with Kyrie and Waiters, guess not now hahahahahah


said the same thing over in the other games thread
A lot of what we call 'thought' is just mental activity

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Those who are convinced of absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities
dobrojim
RealGM
Posts: 16,994
And1: 4,147
Joined: Sep 16, 2004

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1837 » by dobrojim » Tue Jan 6, 2015 10:29 pm

Ruzious wrote:The trade probably can't hurt Cleveland, but I'm not sure it's going to help them much unless Shumpert understands and accepts his role. I have no faith in JR Smith having the discipline to help Cleve. Shumpert's got to understand he's strictly a 3 and D player. If he's not wide open - just pass the ball to an all-star teammate. His only shots should be open 3's and fast break dunks.


wonder what will happen when JR freezes out all the better options CLE has at the end of a close game?
A lot of what we call 'thought' is just mental activity

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Those who are convinced of absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,722
And1: 1,721
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1838 » by mhd » Tue Jan 6, 2015 10:56 pm

I like the trade for the Cavs. They NEED role players, an Smith can get white hot from long range, and Shumpert is a wing defender that they lack. Plus, that future 1st can be used (along with their other picks) to get a defensive big. Solid trade for them.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,902
And1: 10,483
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1839 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Tue Jan 6, 2015 11:44 pm

gambitx777 wrote:I don't know why OKC did this? I mean I really thought that going after Brandon Bass / Brandon Wright would have been clutch for them. I don't see what waiters does for them. . . ?


gambit, here's what the Thunder were thinking:

http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/12125 ... ty-thunder

The Thunder, who used a trade exception to execute the deal, gain the offensively talented Waiters, who had struggled to fit at times over the past two-plus seasons. With Waiters, the Thunder are adding some scoring off the bench and providing insurance for Reggie Jackson, their standout guard who is in the final year of his contract.

"I'm excited about bringing Dion aboard," reigning league MVP Kevin Durant told reporters Monday night. "A guy that has a lot of toughness. Being from the East Coast, I know a lot about Philadelphia, South Philly, where he comes from. Those guys are tough, and they play with an edge. And that's what we need here.

"Just knowing him from playing against him. We're gonna make him feel wanted. I don't think he felt that the last couple years. He's gonna fit in well. He's gonna get comfortable real quick. It's on the leaders -- Russell [Westbrook], myself, Nick [Collison] -- to make him feel at home and feel special and let him play his game."


KD wanted the guy. Likes South Philly tough ballers. The Thunder already know they can't resign Reggie Jackson.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
dobrojim
RealGM
Posts: 16,994
And1: 4,147
Joined: Sep 16, 2004

Re: Discussing Other Teams' Moves Part 4 

Post#1840 » by dobrojim » Wed Jan 7, 2015 6:49 am

Maybe it'll work, but playing tough or with an edge ain't necessarily the same thing as playing smart ie winning basketball.
A lot of what we call 'thought' is just mental activity

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Those who are convinced of absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities

Return to Washington Wizards