ImageImageImage

Jeff Green Traded to the Memphis Grizzlies (official woj tweet page 1)

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob

Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#361 » by Valid » Fri Jan 9, 2015 3:11 pm

return2glory wrote:Look, if we can't get a 1st round pick for Green, then Ainge shouldn't trade him. If a contending team wants him and if only offering a 2nd round pick or some scrubs, then Ainge has the option to not trade. This team already has enough average players, we don't need more.

Ainge doesn't need to help out any teams if the offer in return isn't decent enough.

Green is going to walk in the offseason. I don't see what good it would do to hold on to him. I'm sure someone will offer a late first or a decent young player (i.e. Jordan Adams).
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#362 » by Edug27 » Fri Jan 9, 2015 3:16 pm

Valid wrote:
return2glory wrote:Look, if we can't get a 1st round pick for Green, then Ainge shouldn't trade him. If a contending team wants him and if only offering a 2nd round pick or some scrubs, then Ainge has the option to not trade. This team already has enough average players, we don't need more.

Ainge doesn't need to help out any teams if the offer in return isn't decent enough.

Green is going to walk in the offseason. I don't see what good it would do to hold on to him. I'm sure someone will offer a late first or a decent young player (i.e. Jordan Adams).


Exactly. Not sure what the obsession is over letting players walk rather than moving them. We had posters wanting to let Rondo walk if Danny couldn't get good value for him. smh.
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#363 » by Valid » Fri Jan 9, 2015 3:18 pm

Edug27 wrote:
Valid wrote:
return2glory wrote:Look, if we can't get a 1st round pick for Green, then Ainge shouldn't trade him. If a contending team wants him and if only offering a 2nd round pick or some scrubs, then Ainge has the option to not trade. This team already has enough average players, we don't need more.

Ainge doesn't need to help out any teams if the offer in return isn't decent enough.

Green is going to walk in the offseason. I don't see what good it would do to hold on to him. I'm sure someone will offer a late first or a decent young player (i.e. Jordan Adams).


Exactly. Not sure what the obsession is over letting players walk rather than moving them. We had posters wanting to let Rondo walk if Danny couldn't get good value for him. smh.

Yeah. The only way I'd be okay with just letting a player walk would be if we were getting offered crappy contracts in return, but that isn't the case with Green. More than likely, we'll get some combination of an expiring deal and a young player or a pick.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#364 » by Slartibartfast » Fri Jan 9, 2015 3:22 pm

Get 'er done Danny.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#365 » by sully00 » Fri Jan 9, 2015 3:27 pm

Parliament10 wrote:
Avalanche wrote:
Parliament10 wrote:So, can we just do this for picks? -- Cause we have absolutely no need for Tayshaun Prince, who will be 35 next month.


He's expiring and makes the money match, you would think they could just buy him out and let him join a contender for the rest of the season

I get the money match -- and the expiring. -- We still don't have any use for his contract, though. We're under the cap, and we're already logjammed. -- If they ain't sending us a halfway decent Center, then we don't any bodies from them.


We are not under the cap and it would not matter the Griz aren't under the cap. They need to send out 9 mil in salary to take on 9 mil in salary. You can just waive Prince after the trade deadline if you don't value him. If we trade Green there is no log jam at the 3 let me tell you. I like Crawder but he was a 2nd round pick for a reason, the guy had a chance for about a half dozen dunks the other night and finally got one at the end. Tons of effort and energy but he is not an elite athlete.

Either way the best hope in a trade Boston makes it to take back expiring money unless you are gettting a rookie contract or a core talent. What you want to avoid are the Jameer Nelsons and Joel Anthony's that will tap into next year. When you see those contracts in the deal you should realize that is what the draft picks are really for.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#366 » by sully00 » Fri Jan 9, 2015 3:39 pm

Valid wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
Valid wrote:Green is going to walk in the offseason. I don't see what good it would do to hold on to him. I'm sure someone will offer a late first or a decent young player (i.e. Jordan Adams).


Exactly. Not sure what the obsession is over letting players walk rather than moving them. We had posters wanting to let Rondo walk if Danny couldn't get good value for him. smh.

Yeah. The only way I'd be okay with just letting a player walk would be if we were getting offered crappy contracts in return, but that isn't the case with Green. More than likely, we'll get some combination of an expiring deal and a young player or a pick.


This doesn't make any sense. So you would make a bad trade? What Ainge is asking for is expiring money and a first round pick and probably a useful one not something 7 years from now or heavily protected. If someone offered that for Green he would already be gone. The choices Ainge has to make is if that offer never comes do you take something less, either take on salary to get the draft pick or take a 2nd or perhaps a young player on a rookie deal who has upside or performance issues.

Because of Green's contract and age there are reasons to hold on to him as the return may still be realized in the off season through a trade if he opts in and a S&T if he opts out. Everyone wants clarity on this but Ainge has played this as a liquidation and has been willing to drag out the process in order to maximize the asset return. I believe that will likely be at the cost of his young head coach but it is going to be tough to give on that angle at this point.
TDotsfinest97
Banned User
Posts: 5,075
And1: 5,953
Joined: Apr 21, 2014

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#367 » by TDotsfinest97 » Fri Jan 9, 2015 3:42 pm

How much does Boston want for Wright or Bass from TOR?
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#368 » by Edug27 » Fri Jan 9, 2015 3:45 pm

sully00 wrote:
Valid wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
Exactly. Not sure what the obsession is over letting players walk rather than moving them. We had posters wanting to let Rondo walk if Danny couldn't get good value for him. smh.

Yeah. The only way I'd be okay with just letting a player walk would be if we were getting offered crappy contracts in return, but that isn't the case with Green. More than likely, we'll get some combination of an expiring deal and a young player or a pick.


This doesn't make any sense. So you would make a bad trade? What Ainge is asking for is expiring money and a first round pick and probably a useful one not something 7 years from now or heavily protected. If someone offered that for Green he would already be gone. The choices Ainge has to make is if that offer never comes do you take something less, either take on salary to get the draft pick or take a 2nd or perhaps a young player on a rookie deal who has upside or performance issues.

Because of Green's contract and age there are reasons to hold on to him as the return may still be realized in the off season through a trade if he opts in and a S&T if he opts out. Everyone wants clarity on this but Ainge has played this as a liquidation and has been willing to drag out the process in order to maximize the asset return. I believe that will likely be at the cost of his young head coach but it is going to be tough to give on that angle at this point.


What I'm saying is, Danny could want a useful first rder for Green ..... but if he doesnt get that, than he'll take a useless first rder for Green before letting him walk. Thats my point.
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#369 » by KJandHondo35 » Fri Jan 9, 2015 3:47 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/celticsblog/status/553552567289257984[/tweet]

Count me down for that.

Dorell Wright, TRob and a 1st (say 2015)

for

Green

Question being can we do a pick swap on the sixers 2nd? So they trade Green, move up say 3 spots and get a chance to check out TRob who I very much believe in.
Image
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#370 » by sully00 » Fri Jan 9, 2015 3:52 pm

andy582 wrote:
sully00 wrote:
andy582 wrote:
Who's left to trade away? Green's the only impact vet on this team right now. As long as they don't whiff in the lottery and do a Villanueva/Gordon free agent binge, the rebuild will be done in August. It'll just be seasoning after that.

The Smart/Young draft was clearly the best since 2004. They get another future star at the 3 (Oubre? Johnson?) or the 5 (Okafor, Towns, WCS) and sign one or two impact free agents and they're done.


I don't have a problem with the picks, I like the players but James Young can't even stay in a jersey yet and people think he is going to score 20ppg in the NBA next year? This team is competitive right now because of Green, Thornton, Sullinger, Turner, and Bass. If you move those guys and replace them with draft picks you are the Sixers. Adding more rookies is not going to win you more games. If you have no veteran stars to play with then nobody worth a damn is taking your FA money. That is why you are hearing the Indiana University rumors because the writing is on the wall.

I am not really being critical here I don't know what Ainge's options really were. Does anyone really want Brandon Bass at 7 mil even for free? I am just saying that half stepping like he has will likely mean Steven's fails as a head coach. There is no reason for it to take 3 years to bottom out into a 15-20 win team. I guess you could go with the idea that there will only be a 2 or 3 guys left from this team in 2 years so it will be like starting over again.


Thornton's been out a month... Green and Sullinger keep us competitive about half the time, when they show up.. Turner has been a surprise. Bass is easily replaced. Zeller and Bradley have a bigger role in keeping us competitive.. You're going for the blunt realist take, but this time it's overly cynical..


No it really isn't. I think if you roll Bradley, Smart, Zeller, Sullinger, Crowder out there for 35 min and back them up with Turner, KO, Wright, Pressey, Young you may not win 5 more games. I would love to be wrong I like these players but the defense is really shaky at this point and there is not even close to enough offense. You go with that into next year by adding a couple of rookies and some roster filler I am not sure I see 30 wins even with decent individual progress there is just no bonafide all star talent there is not a lot of experience combine the two and your screwed.
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,599
And1: 12,343
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#371 » by FlatearthZorro » Fri Jan 9, 2015 3:54 pm

TDotsfinest97 wrote:How much does Boston want for Wright or Bass from TOR?


Id say Bass will probably go for a 2nd + fillers, for Wright, Ainge might look for a late 1st or something like that.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#372 » by Valid » Fri Jan 9, 2015 4:01 pm

sully00 wrote:
Valid wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
Exactly. Not sure what the obsession is over letting players walk rather than moving them. We had posters wanting to let Rondo walk if Danny couldn't get good value for him. smh.

Yeah. The only way I'd be okay with just letting a player walk would be if we were getting offered crappy contracts in return, but that isn't the case with Green. More than likely, we'll get some combination of an expiring deal and a young player or a pick.


This doesn't make any sense. So you would make a bad trade? What Ainge is asking for is expiring money and a first round pick and probably a useful one not something 7 years from now or heavily protected. If someone offered that for Green he would already be gone. The choices Ainge has to make is if that offer never comes do you take something less, either take on salary to get the draft pick or take a 2nd or perhaps a young player on a rookie deal who has upside or performance issues.

Because of Green's contract and age there are reasons to hold on to him as the return may still be realized in the off season through a trade if he opts in and a S&T if he opts out. Everyone wants clarity on this but Ainge has played this as a liquidation and has been willing to drag out the process in order to maximize the asset return. I believe that will likely be at the cost of his young head coach but it is going to be tough to give on that angle at this point.

So you're telling me that he is going to be worth more this offseason than he is going to be worth now? Gotchya.

You also have no idea what teams have offered for Green. It's Jan. 9. The trade deadline is Feb. 19. It is entirely possible that Ainge has received some tempting offers but is still searching around the league to see if he can get a better deal.

Either you make a trade, or Green walks. It's that simple. He isn't opting in. It's blatantly obvious that he is miserable here and wants out just as much as Ainge wants him gone.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#373 » by sully00 » Fri Jan 9, 2015 4:07 pm

Edug27 wrote:
sully00 wrote:
Valid wrote:Yeah. The only way I'd be okay with just letting a player walk would be if we were getting offered crappy contracts in return, but that isn't the case with Green. More than likely, we'll get some combination of an expiring deal and a young player or a pick.


This doesn't make any sense. So you would make a bad trade? What Ainge is asking for is expiring money and a first round pick and probably a useful one not something 7 years from now or heavily protected. If someone offered that for Green he would already be gone. The choices Ainge has to make is if that offer never comes do you take something less, either take on salary to get the draft pick or take a 2nd or perhaps a young player on a rookie deal who has upside or performance issues.

Because of Green's contract and age there are reasons to hold on to him as the return may still be realized in the off season through a trade if he opts in and a S&T if he opts out. Everyone wants clarity on this but Ainge has played this as a liquidation and has been willing to drag out the process in order to maximize the asset return. I believe that will likely be at the cost of his young head coach but it is going to be tough to give on that angle at this point.


What I'm saying is, Danny could want a useful first rder for Green ..... but if he doesnt get that, than he'll take a useless first rder for Green before letting him walk. Thats my point.


You can say it but it doesn't make it true. Your hiding from what your saying. Do you take a 2nd? Do take on a guy who has 9 mil coming to him next year? If no then maybe Ainge says no as well. Nothing is nothing either way and in some scenarios it could be worse. If Ainge was motivated to get Green off the team like the tankers then he would be gone. He doesn't have that motivation.

Having a 18ppg guy's bird rights have some value in the off season as well. This team was able to sign and trade Hump for a trade exception and heavily protected 2nd (they would actually get right now). Then he was able to flip the exception for more assets. Ainge is a poker player, I don't love how what he does impacts the product on the floor at times but I respect what he does.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#374 » by sully00 » Fri Jan 9, 2015 4:14 pm

Valid wrote:So you're telling me that he is going to be worth more this offseason than he is going to be worth now? Gotchya.

You also have no idea what teams have offered for Green. It's Jan. 9. The trade deadline is Feb. 17. It is entirely possible that Ainge has received some tempting offers but is still searching around the league to see if he can get a better deal.

Either you make a trade, or Green walks. It's that simple. He isn't opting in. It's blatantly obvious that he is miserable here and wants out just as much as Ainge wants him gone.


And you can read my post below to see how simple you sound. If Ainge wanted him gone, if that was the motivation then he would be a Laker. Trade offered trade refused. From the reports that are out there Ainge had been refusing to even talk about Jeff in trades until Rondo was dealt.

I expect that he will get dealt before the deadline but I think that there are enough reasons to not do it if you don't get the return. If you can get a TPE and a 2nd rounder in the off season, or if Tellum says he wants to opt in to his deal and be traded to destination X and sign an extension there. Why deal him for an expiring stiff and 2nd rounder or take on salary at the deadline?
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#375 » by Edug27 » Fri Jan 9, 2015 4:17 pm

sully00 wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
sully00 wrote:
This doesn't make any sense. So you would make a bad trade? What Ainge is asking for is expiring money and a first round pick and probably a useful one not something 7 years from now or heavily protected. If someone offered that for Green he would already be gone. The choices Ainge has to make is if that offer never comes do you take something less, either take on salary to get the draft pick or take a 2nd or perhaps a young player on a rookie deal who has upside or performance issues.

Because of Green's contract and age there are reasons to hold on to him as the return may still be realized in the off season through a trade if he opts in and a S&T if he opts out. Everyone wants clarity on this but Ainge has played this as a liquidation and has been willing to drag out the process in order to maximize the asset return. I believe that will likely be at the cost of his young head coach but it is going to be tough to give on that angle at this point.


What I'm saying is, Danny could want a useful first rder for Green ..... but if he doesnt get that, than he'll take a useless first rder for Green before letting him walk. Thats my point.


You can say it but it doesn't make it true. Your hiding from what your saying. Do you take a 2nd? Do take on a guy who has 9 mil coming to him next year? If no then maybe Ainge says no as well. Nothing is nothing either way and in some scenarios it could be worse. If Ainge was motivated to get Green off the team like the tankers then he would be gone. He doesn't have that motivation.

Having a 18ppg guy's bird rights have some value in the off season as well. This team was able to sign and trade Hump for a trade exception and heavily protected 2nd (they would actually get right now). Then he was able to flip the exception for more assets. Ainge is a poker player, I don't love how what he does impacts the product on the floor at times but I respect what he does.


Good points. We'll chat again once Jeff is moved.
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#376 » by Valid » Fri Jan 9, 2015 4:23 pm

sully00 wrote:
Valid wrote:So you're telling me that he is going to be worth more this offseason than he is going to be worth now? Gotchya.

You also have no idea what teams have offered for Green. It's Jan. 9. The trade deadline is Feb. 17. It is entirely possible that Ainge has received some tempting offers but is still searching around the league to see if he can get a better deal.

Either you make a trade, or Green walks. It's that simple. He isn't opting in. It's blatantly obvious that he is miserable here and wants out just as much as Ainge wants him gone.


And you can read my post below to see how simple you sound. If Ainge wanted him gone, if that was the motivation then he would be a Laker. Trade offered trade refused. From the reports that are out there Ainge had been refusing to even talk about Jeff in trades until Rondo was dealt.

I expect that he will get dealt before the deadline but I think that there are enough reasons to not do it if you don't get the return. If you can get a TPE and a 2nd rounder in the off season, or if Tellum says he wants to opt in to his deal and be traded to destination X and sign an extension there. Why deal him for an expiring stiff and 2nd rounder or take on salary at the deadline?

Okay first of all, you need to stop belittling anyone who doesn't share your opinion. You are a mod. You are supposed to be above this. You get snippy with just about every single person on this board who dares to disagree with you, and it's getting tiresome.

Second of all, just because Green isn't gone yet doesn't mean Ainge doesn't want him gone. THAT is what you call "simple" thinking. The trade deadline is over a month away. Ainge's hands are not tied yet. He doesn't have to make a deal now if he doesn't want to.

Also, why is it a shock that he didn't even entertain offers for Green until Rondo was traded? The Rondo deal signaled that the potential for a quick rebuild was over. Obviously, keeping Green around was not a bad idea if we were able to turn things around quickly, but we weren't. Now that Rondo is gone, Green becomes all too expendable.

I think you are overthinking this. The chances of him opting in, picking where he wants to go and then signing an extension at said destination are very slim, and even if he does, I don't know what makes you think we are going to get more for him then than we will now. I could actually argue that he would actually be worth a bit more now due to the fact that teams tend to get desperate this time of year (see: Cleveland).
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#377 » by sully00 » Fri Jan 9, 2015 4:24 pm

TDotsfinest97 wrote:How much does Boston want for Wright or Bass from TOR?


His focus is on draft picks and not taking on salary. One key to moving either of those two, and probably Wright more than Bass, would be to send out Jameer Nelson who has a player option for next year with him. Hayes, Fields, Vasquez (would require a first rounder) would all match salary wise to pull it off and can TPE out of the deal.
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#378 » by Andrew McCeltic » Fri Jan 9, 2015 4:30 pm

sully00 wrote:
TDotsfinest97 wrote:How much does Boston want for Wright or Bass from TOR?


His focus is on draft picks and not taking on salary. One key to moving either of those two, and probably Wright more than Bass, would be to send out Jameer Nelson who has a player option for next year with him. Hayes, Fields, Vasquez (would require a first rounder) would all match salary wise to pull it off and can TPE out of the deal.


Yup, I think Nelson gets put in one of these deals.. Wright might garner a 1st in this market, if you guys can't get something better for your pick.. Bass might be worth Nogueira (sic).. Obviously Caboclo, your 1st, Lucas are the only pieces that appeal to Boston..
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#379 » by sully00 » Fri Jan 9, 2015 4:48 pm

Valid wrote:
sully00 wrote:
Valid wrote:So you're telling me that he is going to be worth more this offseason than he is going to be worth now? Gotchya.

You also have no idea what teams have offered for Green. It's Jan. 9. The trade deadline is Feb. 17. It is entirely possible that Ainge has received some tempting offers but is still searching around the league to see if he can get a better deal.

Either you make a trade, or Green walks. It's that simple. He isn't opting in. It's blatantly obvious that he is miserable here and wants out just as much as Ainge wants him gone.


And you can read my post below to see how simple you sound. If Ainge wanted him gone, if that was the motivation then he would be a Laker. Trade offered trade refused. From the reports that are out there Ainge had been refusing to even talk about Jeff in trades until Rondo was dealt.

I expect that he will get dealt before the deadline but I think that there are enough reasons to not do it if you don't get the return. If you can get a TPE and a 2nd rounder in the off season, or if Tellum says he wants to opt in to his deal and be traded to destination X and sign an extension there. Why deal him for an expiring stiff and 2nd rounder or take on salary at the deadline?

Okay first of all, you need to stop belittling anyone who doesn't share your opinion. You are a mod. You are supposed to be above this. You get snippy with just about every single person on this board who dares to disagree with you, and it's getting tiresome.


There is nothing disrespectful in what I said to you or that violates the terms of service and I don't throw around the fact that I am a moderator at you so don't throw it my face. You don't get to tell me what I get to say and how I say it and trust me I have to deal with things that are more tiresome than my being "snippy." You are allowed to disagree, it is a message board. You are posting in absolutes I am showing quite clearly that there is more to it than you are looking at. You do not have to respond to my posts if I am so tiresome just ignore me.

Second of all, just because Green isn't gone yet doesn't mean Ainge doesn't want him gone. THAT is what you call "simple" thinking. The trade deadline is over a month away. Ainge's hands are not tied yet. He doesn't have to make a deal now if he doesn't want to.

Also, why is it a shock that he didn't even entertain offers for Green until Rondo was traded? The Rondo deal signaled that the potential for a quick rebuild was over. Obviously, keeping Green around was not a bad idea if we were able to turn things around quickly, but we weren't. Now that Rondo is gone, Green becomes all too expendable.

I think you are overthinking this. The chances of him opting in, picking where he wants to go and then signing an extension at said destination are very slim, and even if he does, I don't know what makes you think we are going to get more for him then than we will now. I could actually argue that he would actually be worth a bit more now due to the fact that teams tend to get desperate this time of year (see: Cleveland).


Nobody is saying that Ainge doesn't want to trade him, again your posting in absolutes instead of looking at the nuances of the situation. Ainge was not taking offers on Green until Rondo was dealt. That was probably because if Ainge couldn't deal Rondo for a satisfactory return then he would have held on to both players into the off season and played out the hand.

I am telling you that the price tag of an expiring contracts and a first round pick is extremely difficult for contending teams to come up with at this point in the season. Part of the issue is that teams don't even have the salary on their books because contending teams are built with extremely high priced stars and low priced role players. The other issue is that the rules for dealing draft picks and the fact that a couple of teams are stockpiling them makes it difficult to free one up for a deal.

I am not sure if you feel that expiring money and 1st rounder is the starting price or sold price on Green. I think he is sold at that price. If the return is going to be a 2nd rounder or that you have to take on salary to get the first then yes I think Ainge can live with nothing or maybe get more in the off season, I think he got more for Hump.
User avatar
aim2please
Starter
Posts: 2,153
And1: 3,295
Joined: Mar 16, 2013
Location: Ego highway
 

Re: Rumor:Celtics Are Actively Looking to Trade Both Jeff Green & Bass. 

Post#380 » by aim2please » Fri Jan 9, 2015 4:52 pm

For all of those who prefer Celtics to be bad this year, it might be better for C's to keep Green for as long as possible.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/johnschuhmann/status/553570843515969536[/tweet]

+/- isn't telling the whole story, but it's interesting, to say the least, that this is 2nd year in a row where C's are worse when he is on the court.

Return to Boston Celtics


cron