SF88 wrote:LukasBMW wrote:If IT moved the ball, Green had a bit better shot selection (and realized he SUCKS if he takes more then 3 dribbles), and the Morri could avoid Techs, then NO ONE on this team should be moved.
But I don't think IT is going to be happy as a backup and while he played like an allstar for the first 10 games, he's looked like a backup PG recently.
I'd resign Green for a 4 year deal at 6 mil a year, but anymore and he can walk. We have TJ waiting in the wings and lots of other talented 3's to choose from in trades and free agency.
I'd like to keep Plumlee and see if he can regain his confidence. Remember, he has a 42" verticle and is 7 feet tall! I don't know why he has been playing with rock hands and cement feet this year.
But if we have a chance to pick up another big guy or underrated SF for a package of Green, IT, and Plumlee, I pull that trigger in a heartbeat.
I just don't know why any team would want an egotistical 5'9" PG, a shot happy SF on a contract year, and a center who has played like **** all season long.
I think we probably hold steady and try to make the playoffs.
That's WAY too much money. And I don't just say that because I'm not a fan of Green's game.
By giving Green $6M/yr along with the Bledsoe/IT/Tucker/Morris contracts given out, your squandering a ton of cap space.
Your basically committing to this core saying that you think this group can eventually improve enough to be a contender.
Green will probably get that type of money but it shouldn't be from a rebuilding team like us, it should be from a contender who is like one shooter away or something.
Totally agree. In a vacuum, $7m for IT is a good deal, $8m for Kieff is a good deal, $6m for Green isn't bad but when you start adding these deals together and you realise you've spent a fairly large chunk of your cap space on inconsistent niche players.
I'd be much more comfortable if Green could do a little more than just jacking 3's.

















