musiqsoulchild wrote:TheStig wrote:musiqsoulchild wrote:
You wouldnt give that advise if you were a Financial consultant for the ownership group.
If you did, they would move onto the next consultant.
Christ almighty, we are talking about Aaron Afflalo --- he is a needle mover. But how much and how relevant is it to putting us over the mythical hump?
The real hump is Rose + Noah + defense.
What financial consultant would ever advise a client to purchase a sports team as a primary investment? The one who did that would have never been hired in the first place.
We aren't talking about bluechip stocks here. This is a hobby for most owners. Not their primary or secondary source of income. Most don't want to spend into a hole and the bulls wouldn't me. They'd still easily be in the top 20% percentile of profits with Afflalo on a long term deal. Furthermore, between the raised revenues of a longer playoff run, Afflalo's salary would barely be noticeable in the Bulls profit and loss this year.
Say, you are making a presentation to the ownership group (lets get specific, Irwin Mandel --- Bulls CFO).
What is your pitch to get him to sign off on the Afflalo spend for this half season while losing 2-3 assets of the cheaper variety (a returning Dunleavy and future draft picks)?
Irwin's gonna look at Thibs and GarPax and ask "How badly do you need Afflalo guys?" You think GarPax + Thibs are gonna say "We desperately need him?".
I dont think so.
Yes I would. The move is largely salary neutral this year. It improves a team on the cusp. It could lead to additional revenue with a longer playoff run or championship.
And there are not multiple assets lost. There is exactly one. A first round pick. And much like Snell and Teague there is no gaurntee it becomes an asset. Late 1st picks are far from home runs. Furthermore, I'd point out with the roster largely set for last year, there isn't room for 2 first round picks.