ImageImageImageImageImage

Jays Minor League Affiliate/Prospect Discussion Thread

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
aligator
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,884
And1: 432
Joined: Aug 26, 2005

 

Post#41 » by aligator » Wed Apr 4, 2007 1:44 pm

Yes, and I'll disagree even further. Trading Bush was not a mistake. We gave up nothing else of value and received Overbay in return. Bush has been ok in the NL but I have doubts he is a good AL starter. I feel that Casey Janssen will be a much better pitcher than Dave Bush.
OldNo7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,997
And1: 64
Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
       

 

Post#42 » by OldNo7 » Wed Apr 4, 2007 2:55 pm

There are a lot of arguments going both ways on numerous 25 and under Jays prospects that didnt pan out, and/or we let go.

So to me, the question I would need to ask (because I am not fully up to snuff on the minor leagues), do we have inadequate managers, coaches, and people in player development in the minor leagues if all of these people are not working out and we are giving up on them?
Twitter: @NickObergan
User avatar
aligator
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,884
And1: 432
Joined: Aug 26, 2005

 

Post#43 » by aligator » Wed Apr 4, 2007 3:02 pm

The great majority of minor league prospects do not make it to or are not successful in the majors. That's why so many are drafted and given an opportunity in the minor leagues. It is in many ways a trial and error method. The Jays are probably no better or worse than most major leagues teams, though I will add that the Jays system has more depth of pitching prospects than most organizations not named LA or Cleveland. Only 2, McGowan and Romero are projected as high end starters and McGowan is on shakey ground, but there are several who could make it to the show in some capacity.
OldNo7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,997
And1: 64
Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
       

 

Post#44 » by OldNo7 » Wed Apr 4, 2007 3:12 pm

Aside from Snyder and Lind, do we have any high quality bats in our system? What about fielders?
Twitter: @NickObergan
Michael Bradley
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 2,117
Joined: Feb 25, 2004

 

Post#45 » by Michael Bradley » Wed Apr 4, 2007 3:58 pm

aligator wrote:Yes, and I'll disagree even further. Trading Bush was not a mistake. We gave up nothing else of value and received Overbay in return. Bush has been ok in the NL but I have doubts he is a good AL starter. I feel that Casey Janssen will be a much better pitcher than Dave Bush.


The problem here is, you're not backing up your points. You're just stating your opinion.

AL: 234 IP, 4.15 ERA, 5.35 K/9, 2.08 BB/9 (age 24/25)
NL: 210 IP, 4.41 ERA, 7.11 K/9, 1.63 BB/9 (age 26)

Dave Bush can't pitch in the AL? Really?

Here is what "Baseball Analysts" wrote about Bush in September 2006:

For the year, Bush is tied for third in the league in WHIP (1.16). Importantly, the man with the pinpoint control has lowered his BB/9 (from 1.91 to 1.70) and HR/9 (1.32 to 1.09) and raised his K/9 (4.95 to 7.27) by nearly 50% from one season to the next. His Defense Independent Pitching (3.88) and Fielding Independent Pitching (3.85) are considerably better than his ERA (4.44). In fact, his DIPS and FIP rank 11th and 13th, respectively, while the difference between his FIP and ERA is the fourth highest in the league.

The three-year veteran is one of the most efficient pitchers in baseball. He has averaged just 14.5 pitches per inning, the fifth-lowest total in the majors. The top four? Greg Maddux, Roy Halladay, Chien-Ming Wang, and Brandon Webb.

Bush is arguably more like Chris Carpenter than not. They have two of the best Uncle Charlies in the game. Furthermore, these hurlers have similar K and BB rates. The main difference is that last year's Cy Young Award winner does an even better job of keeping the ball on the ground and in the ballpark. Nonetheless, Bush is more advanced than Carpenter at the same age. The latter didn't break out until his first year with the Cardinals when he was 29. Putting Bush in Carpenter's class may be a bit premature, but I believe it captures the younger hurler's upside. Based on his improved command and results of late, it wouldn't surprise me if Bush made a big push in narrowing whatever gap there exists within the next year.


Gabe Gross (the guy with no value according to you) had a .858 OPS last season (.382 OBP) while killing RHP (.294/.400/.508 in 187 AB) for the Brewers last season. Again, like Bush, at least he was given up in a trade for a good player, rather than a inferior talent with options left (which Rosario will inevitably go for).

Chad Gaudin at age 22 in AAA threw 150.1 innings with a 3.35 ERA and very strong ratios. He struggled badly with Toronto (small sample), ran out of options, and went to Oakland where he put up a 3.09 ERA in 64 innings and was stingy with hits and home runs allowed (bad K/BB, but again, he's only 23). He'll probably be a starter/reliever for them this year with many years of service left.

The "not all prospects will pan out" excuse is true. There's always a chance for a prospect to fail, regardless of how highly touted he is. But again, when dealing with players running out of options, you have to be smart in seeing whether they CAN be kept in place of someone more dispensible. That way you potentially keep an arm (or bat) that still has potential but may not have lived up to it yet. Rosario fits that description. Gaudin fit it. Quiroz fit it (until Molina was signed). Brandon Lyon was let go to make room for Jeff Tam's of the world, and Lyon was closing for Boston that year before hurting himself.

Does every team do this type of stuff? Sure. That doesn't mean they can't be prevented from time to time.
User avatar
-MetA4-
Head Coach
Posts: 6,876
And1: 526
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: London

 

Post#46 » by -MetA4- » Thu Apr 5, 2007 1:26 am

Minor League season starts tomorrow. :bowdown:
User avatar
Holmes
Analyst
Posts: 3,395
And1: 3
Joined: Nov 14, 2003
Location: Toronto

 

Post#47 » by Holmes » Thu Apr 5, 2007 2:32 am

whosthebosh? wrote:Aside from Snyder and Lind, do we have any high quality bats in our system?


Yes
User avatar
-MetA4-
Head Coach
Posts: 6,876
And1: 526
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: London

 

Post#48 » by -MetA4- » Thu Apr 5, 2007 3:04 am

Since when is a Shea Hillenbrand bat considered to be "high quality"?
User avatar
Holmes
Analyst
Posts: 3,395
And1: 3
Joined: Nov 14, 2003
Location: Toronto

 

Post#49 » by Holmes » Thu Apr 5, 2007 3:13 am

User avatar
aligator
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,884
And1: 432
Joined: Aug 26, 2005

 

Post#50 » by aligator » Thu Apr 5, 2007 12:59 pm

With regard to Dave Bush, his strikeout to walk ratio was considerably worse in the NL than in the AL. That is usually a red flag and a better indicator of future performance than ERA. It remains to be seen whether he can maintain a regular rotation spot. I am not at all sure that he can.
SmallTownJournalist303
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 3,796
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 16, 2005
Location: Ottawa, ON
Contact:

 

Post#51 » by SmallTownJournalist303 » Thu Apr 5, 2007 10:51 pm

aligator wrote:With regard to Dave Bush, his strikeout to walk ratio was considerably worse in the NL than in the AL. That is usually a red flag and a better indicator of future performance than ERA. It remains to be seen whether he can maintain a regular rotation spot. I am not at all sure that he can.


Are you kidding me? Bush is awesome. This guy walks almost nobody, has an above average K-rate, and doesn't give up so many home runs that it mitigates his effectiveness. Oh, and he's 26 (27?). If he improves his K-rate any more than he'll be a legit stud.
Michael Bradley
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 2,117
Joined: Feb 25, 2004

 

Post#52 » by Michael Bradley » Thu Apr 5, 2007 11:40 pm

aligator wrote:With regard to Dave Bush, his strikeout to walk ratio was considerably worse in the NL than in the AL. That is usually a red flag and a better indicator of future performance than ERA. It remains to be seen whether he can maintain a regular rotation spot. I am not at all sure that he can.


No, it was considerably better.

2004: 2.56 K/BB (64 K, 25 BB)
2005: 2.59 K/BB (75 K, 29 BB)
2006: 4.73 K/BB (166 K, 38 BB)

He's a good pitcher. Potentially very good. Still young enough to improve, and he certainly improved in every important ratio last season. He's still on a pre-arbitration salary as well.

Overbay is a good player, but let's not pretend we gave up nothing to get him. Bush is better than every Jays starter not named Roy or AJ, and he might catch up to AJ eventually if Burnett continues to underachieve/get hurt.
OldNo7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,997
And1: 64
Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
       

 

Post#53 » by OldNo7 » Fri Apr 6, 2007 2:16 am

No offence intended to aligator, just trying to help with your side of the arguments, but it really appears as though you are trying to speak about facts, without actually looking at the numbers, thus all of your arguments are completely false.
Twitter: @NickObergan
User avatar
-MetA4-
Head Coach
Posts: 6,876
And1: 526
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: London

 

Post#54 » by -MetA4- » Fri Apr 6, 2007 3:38 am

McGowan's start in AAA:

5 IP
2 H
2 BB
1 R
0 ER
8 K

Weather apparently affected the hitters quite a bit (the opposing SP had a no-hitter going into the 5th inning). McGowan pitched mostly fastballs as the opposing hitters weren't able to square up on it, threw very few breaking balls and almost no changeups. The one unearned eun came on a Russ Adams error (shocker),
Flip
Sophomore
Posts: 218
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 28, 2006
Location: Canada

 

Post#55 » by Flip » Fri Apr 6, 2007 3:47 pm

Good to see McGowan get 8 k's in 5 innings of work.
User avatar
aligator
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,884
And1: 432
Joined: Aug 26, 2005

 

Post#56 » by aligator » Sat Apr 7, 2007 1:53 pm

5 Shutout innings of 4 hit ball with 9 K's by Geremi Gonzalez last night. Also, 2 shutout innings pitched by Jamie Vermilyea and one each by Blaine Neal and Brian Wolfe(2 K's). Syracuse didn't do too badly offensively either scoring 16 runs. J F Griffin was 2 for 5 with a double and a homer while Adam Lind had 3 hits. Among many with 2 hits were Russ Adams and Ryan Roberts.

Dunedin beat Clearwater 9-7 in the FSL. Two hits apiece by: Cory Patton(including HR), Carlo Cota, Eric Neilson and Jacob Butler.

Other scheduled games rained out.
OldNo7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,997
And1: 64
Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
       

 

Post#57 » by OldNo7 » Sat Apr 7, 2007 2:22 pm

How old is JFG? Does he have a shot at being an MLB regular or even bench player?
Twitter: @NickObergan
SmallTownJournalist303
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 3,796
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 16, 2005
Location: Ottawa, ON
Contact:

 

Post#58 » by SmallTownJournalist303 » Sat Apr 7, 2007 5:59 pm

I think he's 27. He might still have a future as a bench player, but I doubt it.
User avatar
aligator
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,884
And1: 432
Joined: Aug 26, 2005

 

Post#59 » by aligator » Sun Apr 8, 2007 3:28 pm

Not much of cosequence from the minor affiliates yesterday. Syracuse lost while New Hampshire and Dunedin won. Adam Lind and J F Griffin each had 2 hits including a HR for the Chiefs while Anthony Hatch had 2 hits for Dunedin. Eric Ktatz had the only 2 hit game for NH. One of those hits was a HR. Another ofer for John Hattig. Don't know he is playing ahead of Ryan Roberts. Expect that will change soon.
User avatar
aligator
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,884
And1: 432
Joined: Aug 26, 2005

 

Post#60 » by aligator » Mon Apr 9, 2007 1:17 pm

Syracuse lost last night. Poor start for Taubenheim. Excellent relieving by Wolfe and Roney.

Although not considered a top prospect, Brian Wolfe was lights out during ST and was assigned higher(AAA) than most expected. He has continued to pitch shutout ball with high K totals with Syracuse. If he keeps this up until June, he will force a major league look as soon as an opportunity becomes available.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays