Don Tommy wrote:1988 is when I started to follow them. We may have sucked but we were fun. And you could always see that we were building towards the future. What are we building towards now? Not the future with all the picks we've gotten rid of. And we aren't in a win now mood if we are bringing in little baby Rivers. AND trading away a pick. And trading away a young player.
I had more fun watching the Elton Brand, Q Richardson, Darius Miles and Corey Maggette teams than I do watching this year's team.
Yeah I think that's the thing that gets me the most angry, that barring a big surprise of the Linsanity kind, we've peaked and are now going downhill from here on. The Paul-Blake-DJ core might become slightly better, but everything around it is aging role players with no trade value, no picks, no projects, and a front office that doesn't know how to handle trade assets.
Forte IV wrote:The 2017 second we traded is likely going to be 50+. On top of that because the Celtics have so many picks they are more then likely going to move it or draft an international player who has a low percentage change to ever pan out and come over. Bullock I agree with, but don't say the 2nd we gave is a game changer at all. Now if we were talking about our '16 second from the Nets we have, that's different because that actually has a chance to be a 31-40 2nd rounder. But we didn't trade it.
... yet. For me it's two things that piss me off about this trade, giving away Bullock who was the last young player I had hope in to develop into something meaningful, and to spend $2.4M of our cap on a guy who can't play after we've been shackled by the hard cap all year. And who's he a son of, that pisses me off more than anything.