I got a chip on my shoulder. I mean, every team in the NBA said no to me – especially this team. I mean, I couldn’t even get a training-camp invite. The Clippers thought it was a good idea. Doc said no. I tried to get a workout, then Doc said no.
- Hassan Whiteside
How do teams find the right balance between going with vets vs. giving young prospects a chance?
It's still ludicrous to me that 29 teams refused to give Hassan a chance after maturing, both physically and mentally, after his first stint with the NBA. He has one of the longest wingspans in draft combine history, yet teams still went with old vets that had nothing to give.
Same thing with Perkins last year, where Scott Brooks refused to play Adams even though Perkins was one of the worst players in the league. Adams did everything that Perkins was once known for better, but he it took until this year for Adams to start seeing real minutes.
Another example is James Young, where Brad Stevens said multiple times that the wings (Thornton, Turner, etc.


Should young players really have to wait until multiple injuries happen in order to even get a few minutes thrown their way? And why are teams so reluctant to even give young players a chance -- especially bad teams? What is there to lose?
The contributions that old, washed-up vets can give are so marginal compared to what young prospects with undetermined ceilings can give. Isn't it worth a gamble to play young players, especially on bad teams, even when considering the chance that the young player won't pan out?
Sorry, had to get this off my chest. Sick of seeing bad "veterans" get playing time/opportunities over young players.