ImageImageImageImageImage

Bullets v. Lakers

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

User avatar
jmrosenth
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,998
And1: 108
Joined: Nov 02, 2001
Location: "That was for Mr. Pollin." - Tough Juice
Contact:

Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#1 » by jmrosenth » Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:51 pm

IBTL

Wall is questionable with an Achilles injury.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wiz ... th-lakers/
[quote:6312c12ed1="imperium1999"]
i had had two martinis at this point so i asked her if he every shouted DAGGER in the bedroom with her.

she looked at me kinda strangely and said she had no idea what DAGGER meant.
[/quote]
User avatar
J-Ves
Analyst
Posts: 3,054
And1: 1,286
Joined: May 16, 2012
 

Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#2 » by J-Ves » Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:59 pm

Damn that sucks. I'd much prefer Wall sit vs the Suns since that's a loss anyway.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#3 » by Ruzious » Tue Jan 27, 2015 10:21 pm

Achilles injury? I blame the messenger. This is all JRo's fault.

Does this mean we have to watch Garret Temple do a poor point guard impersonation for 30 plus minutes? Geebus, I'd rather try Otto at the point. They look enough alike...
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Illmatic12
RealGM
Posts: 10,161
And1: 8,459
Joined: Dec 20, 2013
 

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#4 » by Illmatic12 » Tue Jan 27, 2015 10:33 pm

Who are they starting at PG, Jordan Clarkson? Beal should be able to do some ballhandling against the rookie
miller31time
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,575
And1: 2,141
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
     

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#5 » by miller31time » Tue Jan 27, 2015 10:38 pm

These are the games we've been uncharacteristically winning this season. Not sure how the team will play without John seeing as how, throughout about 80% of every game, he IS our offense....but it's the Lakers. C'mon. They aren't even trying anymore.
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,925
And1: 9,310
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#6 » by queridiculo » Tue Jan 27, 2015 10:40 pm

How Miller got his groove back?

Would be nice, though I have a feeling that it'll be more likely that Lin will find his.

Good thing that we have so much depth at PG Ernie.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,541
And1: 1,986
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#7 » by gambitx777 » Tue Jan 27, 2015 10:45 pm

Nick Young is out, as long as NENE and Gortat show up half awake we should be ok. But, this is the exact reason why we need another PG on the team ! Paging Stckton, Curry, Frazier, Cotton ! ! !
RustyMagoo
Senior
Posts: 543
And1: 84
Joined: Feb 20, 2013

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#8 » by RustyMagoo » Tue Jan 27, 2015 11:30 pm

Paging Nate Robinson to the white courtesy phone. Nate Robinson, you have a call at the courtesy phone.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#9 » by hands11 » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:23 am

This is the game Otto, Webster and Rasual get it going.

I expect Wall will play. Help them get a big lead and then head to the bench early. He just won't drive much and instead dish out his dimes.

Paul will take the night off. They will make him inactive and make Gooden active.

I even think we could see a nice scoring game from Beal and Kevin. Maybe some Blair if we let Nene rest.

Actually looking forward to the game. Hopefully its a fun on.
jeffsays
Rookie
Posts: 1,050
And1: 150
Joined: Mar 30, 2013
         

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#10 » by jeffsays » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:32 am

No Wall = Loss
With Wall = .667 percent chance of winning
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#11 » by hands11 » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:33 am

jeffsays wrote:No Wall = Loss
With Wall = .667 percent chance of winning


Come on Jeff

Grow a spine brother.
jeffsays
Rookie
Posts: 1,050
And1: 150
Joined: Mar 30, 2013
         

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#12 » by jeffsays » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:39 am

hands11 wrote:
jeffsays wrote:No Wall = Loss
With Wall = .667 percent chance of winning


Come on Jeff

Grow a spine brother.

I was joking (a little) but when's the last time we saw this team play without Wall? We all remember 2012. Without Pierce and Wall? Who knows what could happen. Obviously I don't expect them to lose, but it will be so much more difficult without Wall.
User avatar
bealwithit
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,351
And1: 616
Joined: Jul 03, 2013
     

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#13 » by bealwithit » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:45 am

Is Andre Miller physically capable of playing more than 20 minutes?
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#14 » by hands11 » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:45 am

jeffsays wrote:
hands11 wrote:
jeffsays wrote:No Wall = Loss
With Wall = .667 percent chance of winning


Come on Jeff

Grow a spine brother.

I was joking (a little) but when's the last time we saw this team play without Wall? We all remember 2012. Without Pierce and Wall? Who knows what could happen. Obviously I don't expect them to lose, but it will be so much more difficult without Wall.


Ahh. Gotcha. FTR. I was half messing with you/joking as well.

First, I expect Wall to play. He isn't going to let his streak end. He is will kick it back a gear.

Second, that what makes it more exciting. We get to see other players step up. Again, given I expect Wall to play. But even if he doesn't. Temple would start and he can run the offense find for that they need against the Lakers. That might actually even make them focus more as other players will try to step up.

Really looking forward to this.
nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,298
And1: 2,440
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#15 » by nuposse04 » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:54 am

This is a win win if you ask me, if we win, we win. If we lose, it should be apparent to the staff that Andre Miller isn't even adequate enough to take on the scum **** team that is the lakers. I'm tired of watching him get destroyed on D :/
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,925
And1: 9,310
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#16 » by queridiculo » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:01 am

I know it doesn't make sense, but if Pierce is out, I'm fully expecting Webster first start of the season.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#17 » by hands11 » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:23 am

just watched some of that TOR game and if this is the direction the league is going, there is going to have to be a rule change.

If off, so many pump fakes where the defender played well and the offensive player still got the game.

and if not that, its a 3 ball.

My eyes are literally bleeding right now. Its HOU ball. Its not fun to watch.

30 plus FTA
26 3s

:nonono:
80sballboy
RealGM
Posts: 24,116
And1: 5,822
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
       

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#18 » by 80sballboy » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:24 am

Pierce is officially out. Wall gametime decision.
User avatar
pineappleheadindc
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,118
And1: 3,479
Joined: Dec 17, 2001
Location: Cabin John, MD
       

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#19 » by pineappleheadindc » Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:15 am

These late games kill old guys like me.

:nonono:

Go Wizards!
"Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart."
--Confucius

"Try not. Do or do not. There is no try"
- Yoda
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Bullets v. Lakers 

Post#20 » by hands11 » Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:19 am

80sballboy wrote:Pierce is officially out. Wall gametime decision.


Right. He was out when I said he was out. LOL

If the big toe is hurting, they weren't playing Paul against the LAL. They already showed they would rest him when they felt they could get away with it.

And like I said. Wall will play..

Return to Washington Wizards