hands11 wrote:Limiting turnover is Randy's key, not taking 3s. His view is 2 or 3 doesn't matter if by limiting turnovers you get more shots. You will make it up in volume. Problem is, if they are turning it over, which they do often, then you can't make it up in volume and since 3 is more then 2, you have very little wiggle room to pull away from a team and you will likely lose you lead with them putting up 25 threes.
Limited turnover and top 5 defense. That is what Randy wants.
He doesn't care what shot they take as long as it is open.
That's just Randy.
There's nothing wrong w/ "limited turnovers & top 5 defense"

And there's no doubt that the more shots you get the better your chance to win.
But no coach only wants one thing. He would still be able to internalize the fact that 3-pointers are more efficient shots than 2-pointers. If he can start a string of restaurants, he can do the math!
So, the real question is *why??* Why doesn't he see that he needs to *stop* coaching for "the open shot the defense gives you." Why would the defense give you the shot that's best for *your* team?
As to that string of restaurants he has, does anyone know where they are? We need to set up a picket line outside those restaurants! It's criminal the way he uses Beal.
That said, Ruz is right that it's on Beal -- but I think it's on him to receive the ball ready to shoot, and it's on him to shoot the blasted 3s! Is Randy going to take him off the floor if he shoots more of them at a 44% clip? I don't think so.