Rock Hardy wrote:Slot Machine wrote:Do you ever debate with anything other than logical fallacies? You challenge people to name coaches they'd rather have just so you can "tell them how wrong they are." Do you realize how close-minded and ignorant that is?
You try to present yourself as rational and objective, but you're the opposite. You're a Spoelstra fan so of course you'd disagree with any coaching suggestions. The only difference between you and the annoying LeBron stans we used to have is that at least LeBron deserves to have fans. No coach or player is above criticism and definitely not Spo. Get a grip and learn how to actually respond with meaningful points instead of useless rhetoric paired with a condescending attitude.
You're rapidly becoming the worst poster this site has ever seen.
I haven't told anyone how wrong they are. The suggestion of Malone I replied to with follow up questions. I don't believe those have been answered. The Iowa coach I haven't said was wrong either. Don't jump to conclusions.
I'm not a Spo fan so much as I'm not an irrational hater who can't definitively say what he's doing wrong. We got a bunch of coaching experts here with zero credibility. You seem to view lack of derision as some show off support. It's not. I'm just willing to admit lack of knowledge and thus shut my mouth accordingly. I see nothing to gain from pretending to know what I don't. Get me?
I try to present myself as logical and rational because that's what I strive to be. I don't always get it right.
I think of you want to complain about a problem, there should be a solution in mind, otherwise it's just childish whining. In this case, it's uninformed childish whining, which is decidedly worse. People are free to react as they choose. I'm free to question the logic of said reactions. If I said I want Fizdale to replace Spo as coach, I'd expect someone to ask me why. If I can't explain why, I probably didn't think it through.
BTW, that last sentence you wrote is just plain dumb and wrong. You may disagree with me, but worst poster? The guy who tries to explain himself? Yeah, you're not taking this personally. Ha.
You literally said, word-for-word "Name one [coach] then get ready to be told how wrong you are." I'm not jumping to any conclusions.
No, Pimpwerx, we've been over this many times. Just because I'm not a coach or you're not a coach, doesn't mean we're not able to critique his decisions. That's simply not how the world works. Going by your logic, whenever we criticize a player's actions, we're pretending to be a bunch of playing experts, I suppose. So, I guess since we're not NBA players, we can't criticize the play of an athlete. If we want to keep exploring your illogical world, I suppose Spoelstra shouldn't be able to critique any NBA player because he wasn't an NBA player. You don't have to be in someone's shoes to criticize the work they are doing. You just can't seem to grasp that and I'm not sure why. You didn't grasp it during the Big 3 era under your several other accounts and you don't understand it now either.
There's a difference between being wrong (which everyone is at one time or another) and the way you present yourself as logical or rational. You're not willing to hear new views, let alone accept them. All debates with you are pointless because you bring up your side of the argument and then shout down the other person with long-winded posts saying nothing. Arguing with you is a time-sink, and unfortunately for me, I've gotten caught up in it yet again. The fact that I just had to explain, for the millionth time, why we are able to critique coaches despite not being coaches speaks volumes as to your intelligence.
Again, I have no problem with you supporting Spo but the way you do it is toxic. You're clearly a fanboy (miss me with the objectivity claims, it's the same thing we heard form all the LeBron homers who are now gone). If you disagree with somebody, you present your points, they present theirs and you discuss your differences. Your idea of a discussion is condescension and ignoring the other person. On your old account, Pimpwerx, before you got banned, we had a discussion about the rotation. You asked me to create an alternate rotation instead of criticizing Speolstra's. That's incredibly absurd but I did it anyway, complete with minute allocations. You know what you did? You never responded. This is why arguing with you is pointless. Even if we comply with all your absurd, time-wasting demands, you just disappear to troll another day.
Great last sentence. "LOL UR MAD" I wasn't aware this was 2009 where trying to get someone upset was an endgame. I'm not mad, rather I just feel bad for you in a lot of ways.