DanTown8587 wrote:Rerisen wrote:logical_art wrote:Horford is the best show and go center in the game. Using Pau's defense against his worst possible kind of matchup is not particularly helpful by Coach Nick.
What about the stat that his Defensive FG% at the Rim is 30 in the league among bigs. Do we play Horford every night?
There are very few stats that say Gasol defends the rim poorly
- The stat that has Gasol defending .488% at the rim says he's doing it better than Marc Gasol, Omer Asik, Anthony Davis, Joakim Noah
- Gasol guards guys to shoot .075% LESS than what those players shoot normally on shots within six feet
- The only problem area statistically with Gasol on his defense has been jump shooting (guys make .039% MORE with Gasol guarding them).
http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/2200/tracking/defense/?Season=2014-15&SeasonType=Regular%20Season
The problem isn't Gasol's ability to defend the rim; it's a lack of empty possessions. Right now the Bulls are #1 in the entire league at defending the rim (.583% v league average of .630%) and Gasol is a main reason why.
Right now the issue with Gasol on the floor is lack of turnovers (12.2% turnover rate would be 7th lowest in the league for a team) and too many offensive rebounds (DRB rate of 73.4% is 3% lower than when Gasol sits and is a bottom 10 team ranking). Simply put, the Bulls aren't getting enough empty possessions when Gasol is playing but it's NOT because he's allowing teams to make a ton of shots at the rim nor are the Bulls giving up too many shots at the rim.
Right now in 100 possessions, the Bulls get 11.5 turnovers (that's 1.8 LESS than league average and good for 29th in the league). Right now the Bulls have to defend the rim 88.5 times out of 100 possessions and they give up 105.5 points on those trips, good for 1.19 points. The number one defense in the league is Golden State at 100.4 points/100 but they get turnovers 14.3 times meaning they give up 100.4 points over 85.7 possessions, 1.17 points per trip without turnover.
Your post is right on point from top to bottom and it's plain obvious that the Bulls have much deeper defensive problems than their rim protection, but I'm afraid it's a lost cause with some guys. No matter what the measurable facts say, there are certain people who have their mind set on something and they're just unable to move from there, since it would mean admitting some kind of defeat (actually it shouldn't be that way, it's not a tragedy to be wrong, but that's how you feel when you insist on defending the same ideas over and over and over again regardless of the arguments against them).