Trade Targets (postcript on yesterday-other teams)
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,530
- And1: 11,298
- Joined: Mar 28, 2013
- Location: Renewed Hope
-
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
Trading Middleton makes 0 sense. I'd rather dump Knight in that trade.
VooDoo7 wrote:JEIS wrote:
Kidd would have curb stomped him.
Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.
Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
- Frank Nova
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,344
- And1: 3,532
- Joined: Jul 04, 2008
- Location: Shootin’ dice with Larry Bird in Barcelona
-
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
RKL wrote:Don't think Lakers trade Randle unless Giannis is the return.
And you must be a Lakers fan?
RIP Kobe Forever. GOAT 8-24. Long Live Giannis
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,545
- And1: 1,328
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: Working on pad level
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
weezybaby856 wrote:So no new tweets or "insider" info around here? I feel like a cat waiting for someone to shine a laser pointer at the wall...
Often trades in pro sports end up being the ones which no rumors were talked by socalled media insiders. If one of those socalled media insiders puts out a tweet or story about certain teams talking about a trade involving this or that players, in most cases you can then cross that out as having very little chance of really happening.
Besides BuckPack tossing out a rumor he heard, i don't ever expect a local or national media reporter to have very credible inside information about a real trade in the works because that's the kind of stuff most GM's try really hard to keep from leaking for obvious reasons. It can end up killing the trade being discussed and piss off the players involved if the potential trade falls apart. What instead typically gets leaked and put out as rumor is teams or agents feeding out agenda driven stuff which doesn't lead to actual trades except in rare instances.
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
- Jez2983
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,090
- And1: 8,190
- Joined: Dec 10, 2006
- Location: #team56.4%eFG
-
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
I somewhat doubt we'd send out 6 players in a deal.
trwi7 wrote:Will be practicing my best Australian accent for tomorrow.
"Hey ya wankers. I graduated from Aranmore back in 2010 and lost me yearbook. Is there any way you didgeridoos can send anotha yearbook me way?"
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,908
- And1: 850
- Joined: Jun 22, 2014
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
Giannis Parker wrote:http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=q7d2kuk
We also are getting a 2017 1st (lottery protected) for absorbing Cole and Granger
Lineup this year: (Think swapping Gibbson for Middleton keeps us even)
Cole/Jorge
Knight/Bayless/Stauskas
Giannis/Granger
Dudley/Martin
Gibson/Zaza
Lineup Next Year: (simply love it!!!!!)
Marshall/Bayless
Knight/Stauskas
Parker/Dudley
Giannis/Randle
Gibson/Zaza
#OwnTheFuture
*I know you guys want Middleton, but Lakers want more of a 3 and D
Wut... So many things wrong with this ..
Gibson is not owning the future and bucks make out like bandits..
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
- Rapaz
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,419
- And1: 43,514
- Joined: Jun 12, 2014
-
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
Giannis Parker wrote:http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=q7d2kuk
We also are getting a 2017 1st (lottery protected) for absorbing Cole and GrangerSpoiler:


Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 69 hours)
- Jez2983
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,090
- And1: 8,190
- Joined: Dec 10, 2006
- Location: #team56.4%eFG
-
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 69 hours)
Baddy Chuck wrote:Jez2983 wrote:jakecronus8 wrote:For a top 10 pick, Randle might be the worst defender I've ever seen. That being said, wouldn't mind acquiring him just as an asset with the intention of moving him for another first round pick.
Like Cousins bad or Bargnani bad?
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/DRPM
Bite your tongue nerd.
First off, I enjoyed the top player on the list, thanks for that.
Secondly, I know you've seen all the vines/youtube clips/GIFs of Cousins. He could do it, but doesn't want to. Bargnani on the other hand is just crap.
trwi7 wrote:Will be practicing my best Australian accent for tomorrow.
"Hey ya wankers. I graduated from Aranmore back in 2010 and lost me yearbook. Is there any way you didgeridoos can send anotha yearbook me way?"
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
- Jez2983
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,090
- And1: 8,190
- Joined: Dec 10, 2006
- Location: #team56.4%eFG
-
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
Rapaz wrote:Giannis Parker wrote:http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=q7d2kuk
We also are getting a 2017 1st (lottery protected) for absorbing Cole and GrangerSpoiler:
Thanks for your input, 'Heatlifer'. Love the team you support under your screen name though.
trwi7 wrote:Will be practicing my best Australian accent for tomorrow.
"Hey ya wankers. I graduated from Aranmore back in 2010 and lost me yearbook. Is there any way you didgeridoos can send anotha yearbook me way?"
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,765
- And1: 41,090
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
Rapaz wrote:Giannis Parker wrote:http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=q7d2kuk
We also are getting a 2017 1st (lottery protected) for absorbing Cole and Granger
u mad?
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
- Rapaz
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,419
- And1: 43,514
- Joined: Jun 12, 2014
-
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
The idea of receiving a first-round pick as compensation for "absorbing" a whole $2.1M in salary is delightfully hilarious.

Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
-
- Junior
- Posts: 427
- And1: 78
- Joined: Dec 13, 2012
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
weezybaby856 wrote:RKL wrote:Don't think Lakers trade Randle unless Giannis is the return.
And you must be a Lakers fan?
Knight/Middleton are free agents.
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,765
- And1: 41,090
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
Rapaz wrote:The idea of receiving a first-round pick as compensation for "absorbing" a whole $2.1M in salary is delightfully hilarious.
Your favorite comedian is Ernie Grunfeld?
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
- Jez2983
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,090
- And1: 8,190
- Joined: Dec 10, 2006
- Location: #team56.4%eFG
-
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
Rapaz wrote:The idea of receiving a first-round pick as compensation for "absorbing" a whole $2.1M in salary is delightfully hilarious.
I also find the idea that crappy old Milwaukee is 8 games clear of the mighty Heat at this point of the season delightfully hilarious.
trwi7 wrote:Will be practicing my best Australian accent for tomorrow.
"Hey ya wankers. I graduated from Aranmore back in 2010 and lost me yearbook. Is there any way you didgeridoos can send anotha yearbook me way?"
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
-
- Junior
- Posts: 427
- And1: 78
- Joined: Dec 13, 2012
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
TroyD92 wrote:RKL wrote:Don't think Lakers trade Randle unless Giannis is the return.
Uhhh Randle's value is high, but its not that high.
Parker's value is high but it's not that high.
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,530
- And1: 11,298
- Joined: Mar 28, 2013
- Location: Renewed Hope
-
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
RKL wrote:TroyD92 wrote:RKL wrote:Don't think Lakers trade Randle unless Giannis is the return.
Uhhh Randle's value is high, but its not that high.
Parker's value is high but it's not that high.
What?
VooDoo7 wrote:JEIS wrote:
Kidd would have curb stomped him.
Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.
Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,683
- And1: 27,268
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
RKL wrote:weezybaby856 wrote:RKL wrote:Don't think Lakers trade Randle unless Giannis is the return.
And you must be a Lakers fan?
Knight/Middleton are free agents.
They are also restricted so they're not really free agents.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
-
- Junior
- Posts: 427
- And1: 78
- Joined: Dec 13, 2012
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
TroyD92 wrote:RKL wrote:TroyD92 wrote:
Uhhh Randle's value is high, but its not that high.
Parker's value is high but it's not that high.
What?
1 had a broken leg, other a torn ACL.
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,765
- And1: 41,090
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
The delightfully hilarious thing is Heat and Lakers fans trolling the Bucks' board of all places for trade ideas to improve their suddenly dire forecasts.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,765
- And1: 41,090
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
RKL wrote:TroyD92 wrote:RKL wrote:
Parker's value is high but it's not that high.
What?
1 had a broken leg, other a torn ACL.
You are correct that Parker will not be traded for Giannis. Congratulations.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
- worthlessBucks
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,566
- And1: 4,932
- Joined: Jan 26, 2005
- Location: Bucks Logo
-
Re: Trade Targets (Trade Deadline less than 65 hours)
Can Nicholson play some center? I imagine any move we make will involve a big.
Go Bucks!