InsideHoops VS RealGM
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,551
- And1: 514
- Joined: Sep 26, 2009
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
RealGM is significantly better than ISH.
ISH is funnier though.
ISH is funnier though.
Gallo>brook
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,991
- And1: 4,462
- Joined: May 05, 2012
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
Doctor MJ wrote:So speaking as mod here, I'm find with a thread like this popping up every now and again because the alternative is to look like we have some agenda here. The last time this came up we were in the middle of the Top 100 project, and while I forget the specific numbers I said something along these lines:
If you compare the same project on the 3 major basketball boards being discuss, what you saw is that the other two looked very similar but RealGM looked very different. RealGM had far more posts discussing every spot in the project to that point, and the average length of each post was considerably longer.
I'd say in a nutshell that's the difference specifically between RealGM's PC board and other boards alone the same lines: The discussion here is more studious. More academic, more well researched, etc.
That doesn't necessarily make it better though. It all depends on what you personally want. We get posters here sometimes complaining about the nerd-iness, and I just wonder why they choose to come here given that there are plenty of places to go where you don't have to deal with that.
2 other notes:
1. More generally, I get the impression that moderation is more strict around here than on other sites. Again, that might not be something you like.
2. By no means am I implying that RealGM has a monopoly on badass researchers and other basketball intellects on the internet. In my experience, every major site has folks like that. I think there's a more supportive culture of this here though, and I think that's why you tend to see the top posters from other sites dip their toes in on RealGM too even if they don't want to abandon the site they made their reputation with, whereas the opposite I'd say is less true.
I like the mods posts here. Lots of informative posts with good insight.
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
-
- Junior
- Posts: 428
- And1: 293
- Joined: Nov 27, 2012
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
I haven't been here long or even that active here so hardly biased, but imo realgm is by far the most knowledgeable forum hands down.
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,900
- And1: 3,111
- Joined: Jun 03, 2010
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
InsideHoops is pretty funny. No message board makes me laugh like that place does.
Realgm can be a little uptight at times
Realgm can be a little uptight at times
Re:
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,839
- And1: 5,474
- Joined: Jun 18, 2011
Re:
SactoKingsFan wrote:ISH has some good posters, but you often have to sift through a bunch of troll posts. You'll still see stans and trolls here, but nothing like ISH. The main difference is RealGM has mods that actively enforce rules, while ISH is more of a free for all.
Did someone say, Free for All?
"Stakes are high and so am I.....it's in the air tonight!
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KGzXw8-lC0[/youtube]
MavsDirk41 wrote:
Utah was a dynasty in the 90s
Blazers had a mini dynasty late 80s early 90s
Utah was a dynasty in the 90s
Blazers had a mini dynasty late 80s early 90s
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
- picc
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,586
- And1: 21,166
- Joined: Apr 08, 2009
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
ISH was much more mature from the early 2000's to about 2010. Some of the same great guys are still around there, but a lot more prevalent in the off-the-court board than the GB, and the tone and average age (i'd guess) changed around that time.
Saying that, the general board of realgm isn't that far ahead of the general board there, though people seem to take themselves more seriously here overall. To somewhat of a detriment. And this board is much more segregated, many post only on the GB or in PC and Stats.
Saying that, the general board of realgm isn't that far ahead of the general board there, though people seem to take themselves more seriously here overall. To somewhat of a detriment. And this board is much more segregated, many post only on the GB or in PC and Stats.

-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,567
- And1: 7,035
- Joined: May 25, 2013
- Contact:
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
- DreDay
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,040
- And1: 3,213
- Joined: May 30, 2011
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
This place used to be pretty good but I feel like the And-1 system took a toll on post quality. It's still the best forum but not as good as it used to be.

Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,793
- And1: 6,029
- Joined: Nov 23, 2011
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
picc wrote:ISH was much more mature from the early 2000's to about 2010. Some of the same great guys are still around there, but a lot more prevalent in the off-the-court board than the GB, and the tone and average age (i'd guess) changed around that time.
Saying that, the general board of realgm isn't that far ahead of the general board there, though people seem to take themselves more seriously here overall. To somewhat of a detriment. And this board is much more segregated, many post only on the GB or in PC and Stats.
I agree with this. I remember you from ISH, I left about the same time you did. I think the top posters on ISH back in the 2000s were imo the best I've encountered on the internet.
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 812
- And1: 344
- Joined: Nov 24, 2014
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
Porzingis wrote:RealGM, not close. ISH are bunch of 15 yr old homers.
Plenty of 15 year old homers here too. How else do you explain people putting KG in the top 10 or listing Nash as the greatest offensive weapon ever or ranking Dirk above Larry Bird or seriously comparing Kobe and Lebron to Jordan?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,567
- And1: 7,035
- Joined: May 25, 2013
- Contact:
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,007
- And1: 6,025
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
RSCD3_ wrote:The best part of this place is that there
Happen to be few trolls that like to
Enter conversations and dissing the
Guy on their supposed favorite team.
Unlike on the other site where
You have people that pretend to be
A part of a fanbase and then go and
Blast them so they don't get called
Out on their tendency to troll. It's
Very frustrating to deal with and
Exactly why I came to this site.
Many others don't have the quality of
Excellent moderating here and thus
In other forums you have cases like
Secret alternate accounts that they
Access after they have been suspended or
Terminated. This kind of shenanigans is
Rarely seen on realGM. This keeps people
On their good behavior so it helps
Lift the quality of conversation. So
Let us know what you think of it.
Nice meeting you.
I've always been a sucker for a nice acrostic

Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 21,603
- And1: 12,316
- Joined: Jul 10, 2006
- Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
Don't care just find a seat and sit in it... It's the trade deadline already.
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 657
- And1: 430
- Joined: Oct 15, 2014
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
Stans is the worst, lamest term, leave that at ISH, reminds me of 15 year old losers.
ISH seems to have more threads and stuff, yet they go into less detail and are shorter threads.
Like, when CP3 said that stuff about the chick ref it probs got 3 pages, here it got like 33.
Same as the Blake/trainer thread, this place goes nuts for that stuff hahah
I come here more, but thats probs coz i was allowed to post here first
ISH seems to have more threads and stuff, yet they go into less detail and are shorter threads.
Like, when CP3 said that stuff about the chick ref it probs got 3 pages, here it got like 33.
Same as the Blake/trainer thread, this place goes nuts for that stuff hahah
I come here more, but thats probs coz i was allowed to post here first
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,419
- And1: 3,202
- Joined: Jun 30, 2011
- Location: Atlanta
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
RSCD3_ wrote:The best part of this place is that there
Happen to be few trolls that like to
Enter conversations and dissing the
Guy on their supposed favorite team.
Unlike on the other site where
You have people that pretend to be
A part of a fanbase and then go and
Blast them so they don't get called
Out on their tendency to troll. It's
Very frustrating to deal with and
Exactly why I came to this site.
Many others don't have the quality of
Excellent moderating here and thus
In other forums you have cases like
Secret alternate accounts that they
Access after they have been suspended or
Terminated. This kind of shenanigans is
Rarely seen on realGM. This keeps people
On their good behavior so it helps
Lift the quality of conversation. So
Let us know what you think of it.
Nice meeting you.
Is this a poem?
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
- oldschooled
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,800
- And1: 2,712
- Joined: Nov 17, 2012
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
ISH has no Game6...
Frank Dux wrote:LeChosen One wrote:Doc is right. The Warriors shouldn't get any respect unless they repeat to be honest.
According to your logic, Tim Duncan doesn't deserve any respect.
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,748
- And1: 2,902
- Joined: Feb 22, 2010
- Location: Markham, Ont
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
Fair warning about RealGM forums, whenever the Raptors win, the board has a tendency to crash and not work for about a good 30 mins. Ever since the update RealGM has had this problem.
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
- Han Solo
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,903
- And1: 7,696
- Joined: Jan 07, 2011
- Contact:
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
ThaRegul8r wrote:RayBan-Sematra wrote:But really why are we even talking about another forum here?
There is no need for that.
Agreed. There's no need to stoop to that level. I'm a member of other (non-basketball) forums which don't even allow talking about other forums to prevent forum wars.
Usually a forum is going to say it's better than another to begin with (what, someone's going to say, "No, the other board is better"?). All one has to do is spend time on a board and see for himself which one he prefers.
ProSportsDaily??

Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
- Han Solo
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,903
- And1: 7,696
- Joined: Jan 07, 2011
- Contact:
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
oaklandwarriors wrote:This place used to be pretty good but I feel like the And-1 system took a toll on post quality. It's still the best forum but not as good as it used to be.
I like the and 1 aspect
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
- snaquille oatmeal
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,821
- And1: 4,827
- Joined: Nov 15, 2005
- Location: San Diego
-
Re: InsideHoops VS RealGM
here at realgm we have something called the comparison board ever hear of it op?
that's why we are better
that's why we are better

Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!