Trade Targets (postcript on yesterday-other teams)

mcfromage · Post #7021 » by **mcfromage** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:21 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/568490355370434561[/tweet]

machu46 · Post #7022 » by **machu46** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:21 pm

GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
machu46 wrote:
BobbyLight wrote:DeAndre Jordan is basically everything we thought Sanders would be. Except a better rebounder.

Unless something has drastically changed, he's nowhere near the impactful defender Larry is/was.

hes not even in the same discussion as sanders with overall impact tho. he measures as elite in any metric analysis you want to use. rpm, ws, warp, per... take your pick. at age 26 id be ecstatic to offer him the max this offseason. Id do it and not even blink an eye over it.

I agree. If he'd be willing to sign long-term here, that's the kinda guy I'd be okay including Middleton in a deal for. I was only pointing out that he's not really like Larry.

Dobber-16 · Post #7023 » by **Dobber-16** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:22 pm

BobbyLight wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/daldridgetnt/status/568487856903217153[/tweet]

So does this mean it's done?

Larry is a thief.

machu46 · Post #7024 » by **machu46** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:22 pm

mcfromage wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/568490355370434561[/tweet]

I wonder what the Jazz would want for him from OKC/what would that mean for Reggie?

Post #7025 » by **ReasonablySober** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:23 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/djjazzyjody/status/568490834183782401[/tweet]

Aaron It Out · Post #7026 » by **Aaron It Out** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:23 pm

Probably time to put a nail in the coffin that is the Bucks 2015 trade deadline.

LUKE23 · Post #7027 » by **LUKE23** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:23 pm

I wouldn't call two firsts and then a max offer soon to come as "cheap".

chonestown · Post #7028 » by **chonestown** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:23 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:
BobbyLight wrote:I think the love for Hinkie is hilarious. Yeah, I get it, tanking and picks bring you back to contention, but I am thinking the 6ers might be proving that the cupboard can be left a little too bare.

I wouldn't want to be a Sixers fan but I love watching what they're trying to do as an outside observer. Nobody's ever committed to a tank/rebuild like this before. I'm curious to see if they can pull it off.

Exactly. They've swung for the fences on everything and I applaud them.

BobbyLight · Post #7029 » by **BobbyLight** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:23 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:If a superstar becomes available in a trade in the next couple seasons, is there even a doubt that Philly lands him? What Hinkie is doing is awesome.

So I feel like Harden is the obvious last example of this happening.

But didn't Houston have SOMETHING resembling an NBA team? Meaning, there was at least kind of, sort of something Harden could see that's worth sticking around for?

Anything's possible and I'm certainly curious to see where the Sixers end up in 5 years. If I had to put money on it, I'd guess they aren't going to be title contenders but again, anything is possible.

Dobber-16 · Post #7030 » by **Dobber-16** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:23 pm

humanrefutation wrote:What trade would you rather see:

The Bucks trading Henson as part of a package for Reggie Jackson

Or

The Bucks trading Henson as part of a package for Enes Kanter

Neither......

Post #7031 » by **humanrefutation** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:24 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/djjazzyjody/status/568490834183782401[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/DJJazzyJody/status/568490930824716288[/tweet]

:lol:

JustinCredible · Post #7032 » by **JustinCredible** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:24 pm

The Jazz have no use for Reggie Jackson. I'm guessing it would be a 3 way trade.

drew881 · Post #7033 » by **drew881** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:24 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:If a superstar becomes available in a trade in the next couple seasons, is there even a doubt that Philly lands him? What Hinkie is doing is awesome.

They'll have the cap space and assets. Is that the plan? I just assumed they are confident in their draft picks and will let it play out that way, or perhaps land someone in FA when the time comes.

Badgerlander · Post #7034 » by **Badgerlander** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:24 pm

If the Thunder get Kanter we've gotta make an offer for McGary

Post #7035 » by **humanrefutation** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:25 pm

Dobber-16 wrote:
humanrefutation wrote:What trade would you rather see:

The Bucks trading Henson as part of a package for Reggie Jackson

Or

The Bucks trading Henson as part of a package for Enes Kanter

Neither......

The whole point of that question is to pick one of those options. I'm sure there are many posters here that wouldn't want to make either of those deals.

BobbyLight · Post #7036 » by **BobbyLight** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:25 pm

machu46 wrote:
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
machu46 wrote:
Unless something has drastically changed, he's nowhere near the impactful defender Larry is/was.

hes not even in the same discussion as sanders with overall impact tho. he measures as elite in any metric analysis you want to use. rpm, ws, warp, per... take your pick. at age 26 id be ecstatic to offer him the max this offseason. Id do it and not even blink an eye over it.

I agree. If he'd be willing to sign long-term here, that's the kinda guy I'd be okay including Middleton in a deal for. I was only pointing out that he's not really like Larry.

I think I meant in terms of overall impact at the center position. We figured Larry would be really impactful if he played how he did 2 years ago. DeAndre Jordan is actually impactful, even if in different ways.

I'd have no problem maxing him out next year, either. He obviously has no reason to come here, however.

Post #7037 » by **paulpressey25** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:25 pm

JustinCredible wrote:The Jazz have no use for Reggie Jackson. I'm guessing it would be a 3 way trade.

Or the Jazz leak this to bait us into offering more..... 8-)

JayMKE · Post #7038 » by **JayMKE** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:26 pm

Badgerlander wrote:If the Thunder get Kanter we've gotta make an offer for McGary

they're not going to do it

JustinCredible · Post #7039 » by **JustinCredible** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:27 pm

Maybe once the shoe drops on the OKC/Nets deal then an Enes deal drops next (us?).

Dobber-16 · Post #7040 » by **Dobber-16** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:27 pm

humanrefutation wrote:
Dobber-16 wrote:
humanrefutation wrote:What trade would you rather see:

The Bucks trading Henson as part of a package for Reggie Jackson

Or

The Bucks trading Henson as part of a package for Enes Kanter

Neither......

The whole point of that question is to pick one of those options. I'm sure there are many posters here that wouldn't want to make either of those deals.

Okay, if I had to pick one, it would be Kanter. Not fond of him either though. Jackson is a definite problem in the OKC locker room.