ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,565
And1: 1,992
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1921 » by gambitx777 » Fri Feb 20, 2015 8:08 am

nuposse04 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:Sessions is not a terrible grab. If he can get back in to form by play off time this could be a solid up grade! Now we should have made other moves! look at what the 76ers were doing, I have no doubt that a second and Thomas would have gotten them to take webby! But oh well. We have some room to bring in a guy of the street. Jerebko, Datome, or Shved could hit the waiver wire soon and I would pick up any of those 3 guys!. Plus China guys coming back and any one else who gets bought out or cut. Kick gooden to the curb and add 2 solid players. It's not the best that could have happened, but its not the worst. Teams like the bucks, the heat and OKC all got better, the pistons did not do to badly either. We just did a moderately good possible upgrade.
If sanders is not as far gone as we think and Shved's issues can be handled. They would help this team a lot. Risky maybe, but if it paid off it could be almost like the deals that were not made. If not there are still guys to bring in that would get minutes over temple/kevin/blair/gooden.

Are we sure we did not get anything else in the Sessions / miller deal?


shved is trash of the worst kind, he's never been decent.

Jonas would be a great grab. He has 3pt range. Doesn't rebound that well but I figure it is hard to rebound in DET with Drummond and Monroe padding their stats. I don't see any reason for BOS to cut him though, they aren't over on players are they?

We might be best off bringing in Birch still and telling Hump to launch 3s :/

I did not know that Kelly and sully were hurt.
I mean there are options, Dominique Jones would be nice him and sessions could hold it down on D in the second unit and if they both played well that would be a nice back up back court. as for a big I think we need to cut gooden and bring in someone. Viacheslav Kravtsoz, Eli Holman, Brandon Costner, Trey Thompkins, Arnett Moultrie, would all be very nice additions.
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,937
And1: 9,319
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1922 » by queridiculo » Fri Feb 20, 2015 11:55 am

So, according to the Washington Post the Wizards believe that Sessions. drop off in production may have had to do with his balky back.

What's the over under that he'll get surgery within the next three to four months?




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1923 » by Ruzious » Fri Feb 20, 2015 2:33 pm

queridiculo wrote:So, according to the Washington Post the Wizards believe that Sessions. drop off in production may have had to do with his balky back.

What's the over under that he'll get surgery within the next three to four months?

But before that, sign him to a 4 year extension.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
TheSecretWeapon
RealGM
Posts: 17,122
And1: 877
Joined: May 29, 2001
Location: Milliways
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1924 » by TheSecretWeapon » Fri Feb 20, 2015 3:55 pm

queridiculo wrote:So, according to the Washington Post the Wizards believe that Sessions. drop off in production may have had to do with his balky back.

What's the over under that he'll get surgery within the next three to four months?



That's just silliness. Balky backs routinely fix themselves.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,640
And1: 23,113
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1925 » by nate33 » Fri Feb 20, 2015 4:23 pm

TheSecretWeapon wrote:
queridiculo wrote:So, according to the Washington Post the Wizards believe that Sessions. drop off in production may have had to do with his balky back.

What's the over under that he'll get surgery within the next three to four months?



That's just silliness. Balky backs routinely fix themselves.

:nonono:
WallToWall
Veteran
Posts: 2,911
And1: 1,077
Joined: May 20, 2010
         

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1926 » by WallToWall » Fri Feb 20, 2015 5:26 pm

TheSecretWeapon wrote:
queridiculo wrote:So, according to the Washington Post the Wizards believe that Sessions. drop off in production may have had to do with his balky back.

What's the over under that he'll get surgery within the next three to four months?



That's just silliness. Balky backs routinely fix themselves.

I am sure our crack medical staff looked at it before the trade went through. We're good, nothing to be concerned about.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,248
And1: 20,654
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1927 » by dckingsfan » Fri Feb 20, 2015 6:33 pm

That would explain why he could not stay in front of ANYONE

Sessions + Seraphin on D should be really interesting for the second unit :nonono:
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1928 » by Ruzious » Fri Feb 20, 2015 6:59 pm

Thomas Robinson was bought out today. Any thoughts on whether the Wiz should make a run at him? He's an excellent rebounder, but he has several issues on offense (as he did in college) and fouls a lot.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
TheSecretWeapon
RealGM
Posts: 17,122
And1: 877
Joined: May 29, 2001
Location: Milliways
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1929 » by TheSecretWeapon » Fri Feb 20, 2015 7:17 pm

Ruzious wrote:Thomas Robinson was bought out today. Any thoughts on whether the Wiz should make a run at him? He's an excellent rebounder, but he has several issues on offense (as he did in college) and fouls a lot.


Robinson has played poorly in the NBA. Don't see much point in bringing him in.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,315
And1: 2,471
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1930 » by nuposse04 » Fri Feb 20, 2015 7:49 pm

Ruzious wrote:Thomas Robinson was bought out today. Any thoughts on whether the Wiz should make a run at him? He's an excellent rebounder, but he has several issues on offense (as he did in college) and fouls a lot.


I think finding a shot blocking 5 or a stretch big is probably a bigger priority, and I say this as someone who really wants to see T-Rob find success.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,208
And1: 8,015
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1931 » by Dat2U » Fri Feb 20, 2015 7:57 pm

Undersized PFs simply make for disastrous top 5 picks.... see Thomas Robinson & Anthony Bennett as very recent examples. Two guys many folks here were highly interested in during their respective drafts.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1932 » by Ruzious » Fri Feb 20, 2015 9:00 pm

I concur with all 3 responses - though I'm not sure he's under-sized. He looks the part and has the physical ability - he's just not a real good basketball player.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,640
And1: 23,113
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1933 » by nate33 » Fri Feb 20, 2015 9:12 pm

Dat2U wrote:Undersized PFs simply make for disastrous top 5 picks.... see Thomas Robinson & Anthony Bennett as very recent examples. Two guys many folks here were highly interested in during their respective drafts.

Yeah, but Michael Beasley and Derrick Williams panned out just fine.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1934 » by hands11 » Sat Feb 21, 2015 12:41 am

WallToWall wrote:
hands11 wrote:At least I won't have to read about how we are the oldest team in the league anymore. Gotta factor that in, right ?


And if we got rid of Gooden (not that we should), we would average even younger.


Which is why complaining saying they were an old team was such a joke.

Specially since Rasual doesn't play near his age. Dude is 35 and he plays like he is 30

And Gooden at 33 is not a big deal. Dude should be fresh as a daisy having not logged many minutes this year.

That only leave Paul as the old dude.

Miller made them look like a much older team then they actually are.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1935 » by hands11 » Sat Feb 21, 2015 12:48 am

Interesting Read on how the trade was actually pulled off

http://www.bulletsforever.com/2015/2/20 ... de-machine

Nice to know someone know what they are doing regarding the rules.

We shouldn't forget the TPE we got here.

And that extra room might mean a better player then vet min.

I guess when you add it all up, it was a decent little deal they pulled off.

Younger, faster player that drives, shoot more three, get to the line more, has some upside if the fit is right, signed next year so I imagine less cap hold, less money this year, TPE and whatever player we can now add..

Ray Allen ? Who knows.
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,567
And1: 854
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1936 » by LyricalRico » Sat Feb 21, 2015 12:54 am

hands11 wrote:Interesting Read on how the trade was actually pulled off

http://www.bulletsforever.com/2015/2/20 ... de-machine

Nice to know someone know what they are doing regarding the rules.

We shouldn't forget the TPE we got here.

And that extra room might mean a better player then vet min.

I guess when you add it all up, it was a decent little deal they pulled off.

Younger, faster player that drives, shoot more three, get to the line more, has some upside if the fit is right, signed next year so I imagine less cap hold, less money this year, TPE and whatever player we can now add..

Ray Allen ? Who knows.


Exactly.
User avatar
TheSecretWeapon
RealGM
Posts: 17,122
And1: 877
Joined: May 29, 2001
Location: Milliways
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1937 » by TheSecretWeapon » Sat Feb 21, 2015 1:43 am

hands11 wrote:
WallToWall wrote:
hands11 wrote:At least I won't have to read about how we are the oldest team in the league anymore. Gotta factor that in, right ?


And if we got rid of Gooden (not that we should), we would average even younger.


Which is why complaining saying they were an old team was such a joke.

Specially since Rasual doesn't play near his age. Dude is 35 and he plays like he is 30

And Gooden at 33 is not a big deal. Dude should be fresh as a daisy having not logged many minutes this year.

That only leave Paul as the old dude.

Miller made them look like a much older team then they actually are.


Not really. Us stat goobers use minutes-weighted age. Miller certainly pulled the Wizards up a bit, but he was only getting 12.4 minutes per game. The Wizards rotation is pretty old -- Pierce is an NBA senior citizen. After him, Nenê is at the tail end of "middle-aged". Gortat is middle-aged by NBA standards. So is Sessions. Butler is old. So is Gooden.

The Wizards have one quality young player (Wall). Beal and Porter have potential and are expected to be good in the future. Seraphin is pretty young, but not so good. They won't use Blair.

Switching from Miller to Sessions might knock the Wiz to 8th oldest in minutes-weighted age.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,565
And1: 1,992
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1938 » by gambitx777 » Sat Feb 21, 2015 11:11 am

Sessions was a calculated risk, if he can pull it together, he will be worlds better than Miller at this point. if not he is not much worse!
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,408
And1: 6,809
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1939 » by TGW » Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:36 pm

LyricalRico wrote:
hands11 wrote:Interesting Read on how the trade was actually pulled off

http://www.bulletsforever.com/2015/2/20 ... de-machine

Nice to know someone know what they are doing regarding the rules.

We shouldn't forget the TPE we got here.

And that extra room might mean a better player then vet min.

I guess when you add it all up, it was a decent little deal they pulled off.

Younger, faster player that drives, shoot more three, get to the line more, has some upside if the fit is right, signed next year so I imagine less cap hold, less money this year, TPE and whatever player we can now add..

Ray Allen ? Who knows.


Exactly.


Exactly what? You honestly believe Sessions is an upgrade? I know your rose-colored glasses want you to think Sessions is better than Miller, but this was not a good trade. Miller was a captain for that second unit—Sessions literally is better at nothing other than maybe penetrating (and missing shots).

Going from 39 to 29 isn't a move made for youth. That's a stupid argument that doesn't apply. At this point, we need players that can contribute and play at a high level, and Sessions doesn't fit that bill. Neither will some bum they sign off the scrap heap for around the vet min.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,565
And1: 1,992
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXVIII 

Post#1940 » by gambitx777 » Sat Feb 21, 2015 9:18 pm

TGW wrote:
Exactly what? You honestly believe Sessions is an upgrade? I know your rose-colored glasses want you to think Sessions is better than Miller, but this was not a good trade. Miller was a captain for that second unit—Sessions literally is better at nothing other than maybe penetrating (and missing shots).

Going from 39 to 29 isn't a move made for youth. That's a stupid argument that doesn't apply. At this point, we need players that can contribute and play at a high level, and Sessions doesn't fit that bill. Neither will some bum they sign off the scrap heap for around the vet min.

It's not like Sessions is a scrub, hes not. a down year sure, but he is not a bad player. Last year we would have killed to get him. if he get's back to form he will be a lot better than miller, if not he won't be much worse. Plus we have more flexibility. We can go and bring in a Seth Curry, Kalin Lucas, Bryce Cotton, Aaron Craft, Peyton Siva, or a Gary Talton and not have Miller going nuclear because he's not playing. Then if who ever we bring in flops we have Sessions to come in and give us some solid play. There are some advantages to having sessions.

Return to Washington Wizards