Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade.

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Who should have given up a first round draft pick?

I'm a Pistons fan - OKC
2
4%
I'm Neutral - OKC
16
32%
I'm a Thunder fan - OKC
2
4%
I'm a Pistons fan - Detroit
4
8%
I'm Neutral - Detroit
13
26%
I'm a Thunder fan - Detroit
1
2%
Both
4
8%
Neither
8
16%
Detroit
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 50

User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#1 » by bondom34 » Sat Feb 28, 2015 12:42 am

Alright, there's been a debate on the OKC board between a Pistons poster and OKC fans on the trade. The debate is the claim that OKC shouldn't have had to give a first to Utah, and Detroit should have, hence Detroit came out best in the deal. I'm starting a poll here as I'm hoping to get some non-biased input. For anyone unsure of details:

OKC Out: Perkins, Jackson, Jerrett, Pleiss, 2017 first (lotto protected), future second
In: Kanter, Augustin, Singler, Novak, Detroit second

Detroit Out: Singler, Augustin, second
In: Jackson

Utah Out: Kanter, Novak
In: Perkins, Jerrett, Pleiss, OKC first and second
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#2 » by Blkbrd671 » Sat Feb 28, 2015 12:45 am

Good sh* bondom
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#3 » by bondom34 » Sat Feb 28, 2015 12:46 am

Blkbrd671 wrote:Good sh* bondom

:lol: Thanks.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Trader_Joe
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 29,176
And1: 3,953
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
 

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#4 » by Trader_Joe » Sat Feb 28, 2015 12:51 am

I was shocked by how little Detroit had to give up, so yeah I think if anything they should have given a protected 1st instead of a 2nd.

Way I see it Kanter and RJ have very similar value and they are in very similar positions in free agency.

Thus..

Perkins, Jerrett, Pleiss, #1
for
Augustin, Singler, Novak

Seems like an overpay.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#5 » by Blkbrd671 » Sat Feb 28, 2015 1:07 am

Spoiler:
bondom34 wrote:Alright, there's been a debate on the OKC board between a Pistons poster and OKC fans on the trade. The debate is the claim that OKC shouldn't have had to give a first to Utah, and Detroit should have, hence Detroit came out best in the deal. I'm starting a poll here as I'm hoping to get some non-biased input. For anyone unsure of details:

OKC Out: Perkins, Jackson, Jerrett, Pleiss, 2017 first (lotto protected), future second
In: Kanter, Augustin, Singler, Novak, Detroit second

Detroit Out: Singler, Augustin, second
In: Jackson

Utah Out: Kanter, Novak
In: Perkins, Jerrett, Pleiss, OKC first and second



i think the poll might be f* up, its one of those, you have to remember what teh question is asking before you answer. lol so far poll has okc, thread has detroit
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#6 » by bondom34 » Sat Feb 28, 2015 1:14 am

Blkbrd671 wrote:
Spoiler:
bondom34 wrote:Alright, there's been a debate on the OKC board between a Pistons poster and OKC fans on the trade. The debate is the claim that OKC shouldn't have had to give a first to Utah, and Detroit should have, hence Detroit came out best in the deal. I'm starting a poll here as I'm hoping to get some non-biased input. For anyone unsure of details:

OKC Out: Perkins, Jackson, Jerrett, Pleiss, 2017 first (lotto protected), future second
In: Kanter, Augustin, Singler, Novak, Detroit second

Detroit Out: Singler, Augustin, second
In: Jackson

Utah Out: Kanter, Novak
In: Perkins, Jerrett, Pleiss, OKC first and second



i think the poll might be f* up, its one of those, you have to remember what teh question is asking before you answer. lol so far poll has okc, thread has detroit

Don't know, will ask people to chime in please though, as TJ is the one neutral Detroit vote I assume, so don't know what's going on.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,770
And1: 14,030
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#7 » by Scoot McGroot » Sat Feb 28, 2015 1:36 am

I was shocked Detroit got Jackson for almost essentially nothing. I think they should have given up a (protected) 1st, and OKC keep theirs.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#8 » by loserX » Sat Feb 28, 2015 1:38 am

I was a bit surprised Detroit got RJ quite *that* cheaply, but then other reports started coming out (and that's all I know; they were reports...maybe OKC fans can confirm or deny?). It's true that Kanter's agent did publicly ask for a trade, but apparently RJ was also openly grousing about it every day in practice, deliberately pounding the ball, freezing other players out, and basically being such a huge pain that he made himself un-keep-able.

In addition, leading up to the deadline, Kanter was actually playing quite well...and RJ really wasn't.

And third, given the above, everyone knew that RJ wasn't going to be re-signed by OKC, whereas Utah could still say "hey, maybe we'll work it out and keep Enes!" (even if that wasn't necessarily the plan). Utah had the leverage to demand a pick, and OKC didn't.

In the end, I *don't* think RJ had the same trade value as Kanter, and the trade itself would suggest the same.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#9 » by spearsy23 » Sat Feb 28, 2015 2:10 am

A 24 yo backup pg who was a malcontent, playing poorly, wanted out and was losing minutes to Dion Waiters vs a 22 yo center who wanted out, was playing well, was playing hard and was losing minutes to Rudy Gobert. It's obvious who had more value. Detroit probably sucked some value from Utah, but that's Utah's problem and is irrelevant to OKC.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,322
And1: 20,917
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#10 » by HartfordWhalers » Sat Feb 28, 2015 2:40 am

Trader_Joe wrote:I was shocked by how little Detroit had to give up, so yeah I think if anything they should have given a protected 1st instead of a 2nd.

Way I see it Kanter and RJ have very similar value and they are in very similar positions in free agency.

Thus..

Perkins, Jerrett, Pleiss, #1
for
Augustin, Singler, Novak

Seems like an overpay.


Agreed. I feel like Detroit absolutely fleeced on this deal.
User avatar
Foshan
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 10,529
And1: 2,099
Joined: Jan 10, 2009

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#11 » by Foshan » Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:17 am

I don't think Jackson's value was as high as Kanter's.

I think OKC has already 'won' the deal, in that Kanter seems to be a good fit, and is going to contribute to a playoff team. That said, if Jackson ends up staying with DET and being a capable starter, they got a steal of a deal.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,375
And1: 98,223
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#12 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:31 am

Im still amazed by everyone who thinks Jackson is a particularly good player or more importantly had particularly high trade value. He was a malcontent, showed that when given the team to run he clearly wasn't up to the task, was about to be an RFA and had already rejected an enormous contract.

I think Augustin is every bit the player he is plus they gave up a cheap rotation guy in Singler and a 2nd. They certainly didn't steal anything imo.

People got caught in the name and not the performance. Kinda like when Cleveland stole so much value in the Waiters deal.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,322
And1: 20,917
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#13 » by HartfordWhalers » Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:31 am

Foshan wrote:I don't think Jackson's value was as high as Kanter's.

I think OKC has already 'won' the deal, in that Kanter seems to be a good fit, and is going to contribute to a playoff team. That said, if Jackson ends up staying with DET and being a capable starter, they got a steal of a deal.


I would have put Jackson's not just equal, but higher.


Chuck Texas wrote:Im still amazed by everyone who thinks Jackson is a particularly good player or more importantly had particularly high trade value. He was a malcontent, showed that when given the team to run he clearly wasn't up to the task, was about to be an RFA and had already rejected an enormous contract.

I think Augustin is every bit the player he is plus they gave up a cheap rotation guy in Singler and a 2nd. They certainly didn't steal anything imo.

People got caught in the name and not the performance. Kinda like when Cleveland stole so much value in the Waiters deal.



Eh, I said that was awful for OKC at the time. RJ has shown some very good skills. Waiters hasn't. Very very different.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,375
And1: 98,223
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#14 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:34 am

No way Jackson should have had more value than Kanter. Just absolutely no way. Kanter is the better player plus he's a big. You can find inefficient small guards who fancy themselves a first option without any problems at all.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
The Sparest
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,384
And1: 446
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
 

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#15 » by The Sparest » Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:39 am

I think that for what OKC received the 1st was fair value. But I think Det should have given the other 2nd round pick instead of OKC.
AKA: Sparey Spareman
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#16 » by bondom34 » Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:40 am

HartfordWhalers wrote:
Foshan wrote:I don't think Jackson's value was as high as Kanter's.

I think OKC has already 'won' the deal, in that Kanter seems to be a good fit, and is going to contribute to a playoff team. That said, if Jackson ends up staying with DET and being a capable starter, they got a steal of a deal.


I would have put Jackson's not just equal, but higher.


Chuck Texas wrote:Im still amazed by everyone who thinks Jackson is a particularly good player or more importantly had particularly high trade value. He was a malcontent, showed that when given the team to run he clearly wasn't up to the task, was about to be an RFA and had already rejected an enormous contract.

I think Augustin is every bit the player he is plus they gave up a cheap rotation guy in Singler and a 2nd. They certainly didn't steal anything imo.

People got caught in the name and not the performance. Kinda like when Cleveland stole so much value in the Waiters deal.



Eh, I said that was awful for OKC at the time. RJ has shown some very good skills. Waiters hasn't. Very very different.

This surprises me actually too. From OKC fans, he;s just ok, and has played poorly this year. TBH he had a great game against Memphis in the playoffs, and gained an unearned rep for it.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
azwfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,482
And1: 3,839
Joined: May 21, 2004
     

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#17 » by azwfan » Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:17 am

I thought Detroit gave up too much for RJ and Utah got too little for Kanter. From the little i've seen of him, i thought Jackson was terrible. He holds the ball way too long for a PG, and chucks up bad shots. I figured my very little sample size was skewing my opinion on him based on just about everyone on here loving him.

Kanter is a skilled big that doesnt play much D, but his size gave the W's issues. I thought he was a great pickup for OKC. Even taking him out of the deal... Augustine, Novak, and Singler IMO are better for OKC than Jackson (i guess i'm a hater. I just don't like PGs that hold the ball too much an inefficiently chuck.) Perkins is a rotation big but provides nothing but size. I know nothing about the other two kids the Thunder traded.

The thunder made out like bandits in this trade as is. Great trade for them.

The Pistons got Jackson. Hopefully he'll do well for them, but i think they lost the trade.
LF75 wrote: It was a dumb idea..And yes I'm a dick.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#18 » by loserX » Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:39 am

I would have put Kanter's value higher than RJ's, but then I'm a Jazz homer :dontknow:

play this season - Kanter by a bit
attitude this season - Kanter by a mile
age - Kanter by two years
positional demand - Kanter by several inches
contract - push

There really aren't health issues for either guy, so the only thing left is upside...you'd have to think a *lot* more of RJ's than Kanter's (despite the age difference) in order to not give the overall value edge to Kanter. That's how I saw it, anyway.

(But as I said, I'm still surprised Detroit got RJ for quite that cheap.)
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#19 » by bondom34 » Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:45 am

FYI, the Pistons saw OKC Jackson Friday. That was what we saw all year, and why Augustin is great for the Thunder.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Trade Value Question from a Recent Trade. 

Post#20 » by Blkbrd671 » Sat Feb 28, 2015 7:40 am

bondom34 wrote:FYI, the Pistons saw OKC Jackson Friday. That was what we saw all year, and why Augustin is great for the Thunder.



3 game into the season, coming off 2 great performances against 2 elite guards in the league. Just saying, we knew we weren't gettin a finished product. I guess i can wait til DJ has his horrid game, but i don't feel its worth a mention, i don't think any player is great all th e time.

Return to Trades and Transactions