jdm3 wrote:Sik Infant wrote:Braggins wrote:I think we also went 4-1 during that stretch, but apparently 23 7 3 with 2 wins is better than 30 5 6 with 4 wins. Kemba also isnt good in the pnr now apparently. I dont remember the exact numbers, but Im pretty sure MKG and Zeller were scoring just as much during Kembas stretch. It kind of seems like sik infant was just looking for an excuse to diminish Kembas contributions.
The point being that everyone else looks better when Mo is playing.
Everyone (aside from Al) plays better.
It's amusing that when it comes down to it, certain posters are more concerned with the success of Kemba as opposed to the success of the team.
Anyone who honestly thinks that Kemba is the be all, and end all, of this team cannot honestly be a fan of the team itself imo.
If am not sure that is Mo as much as an adjustment to our offense. We have not been playing Alfense since the all star break. I think Kemba would have a few less assists but a few more points in this system. If we stay aggressive and play like this once Kemba is back I think we will see very good things from both these guys. I do not think this is really a Mo vs Kemba debate as much as Alfense vs Offense.
Excellent post and I agree.
The question is who changed the offense?
Mo or Clifford?
