Jose Calderon and Tim Hardaway Jr to Indiana...

sportscrazy · Post #1 » by **sportscrazy** » Wed Mar 4, 2015 7:11 pm

If the Knicks were to offer the Pacers Hardaway Jr. and Calderon, what could they get? George Hill? George Hill + fillers (what fillers, if so)?

Clutch31 · Post #2 » by **Clutch31** » Wed Mar 4, 2015 8:36 pm

I don't the pacers fo has any interest in Calderon

Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met behulp van RealGM Forums

pacers33 · Post #3 » by **pacers33** » Wed Mar 4, 2015 10:36 pm

Clutch31 wrote:I don't the pacers fo has any interest in Calderon

Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met behulp van RealGM Forums

Well, Hill isn't much of a playmaker...but he's much better than Calderon. Jose happens to be on a terrible contract at the moment. Hardaway JR has talent and would be a good scoring guard off the bench. I would rather keep Hill and Stuckey over taking on Jose's garbage contract.

Post #4 » by **Scoot McGroot** » Wed Mar 4, 2015 11:55 pm

sportscrazy wrote:If the Knicks were to offer the Pacers Hardaway Jr. and Calderon, what could they get? George Hill? George Hill + fillers (what fillers, if so)?

You're not getting George Hill. Maybe Miles and Rudez? I had thought maybe we would've done Scola/Copeland at this deadline for Calderon/Hardaway, but we didn't. Everyone we have signed and tradeable this summer are either much better, more valuable, or as effective yet cheaper.

Clutch31 · Post #5 » by **Clutch31** » Thu Mar 5, 2015 10:30 am

pacers33 wrote:
Clutch31 wrote:I don't the pacers fo has any interest in Calderon

Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met behulp van RealGM Forums

Well, Hill isn't much of a playmaker...but he's much better than Calderon. Jose happens to be on a terrible contract at the moment. Hardaway JR has talent and would be a good scoring guard off the bench. I would rather keep Hill and Stuckey over taking on Jose's garbage contract.

Exactly, and is Hardaway JR really better at SG then what we have now ?

Wizop · Post #6 » by **Wizop** » Thu Mar 5, 2015 3:33 pm

Hill isn't going anywhere. Sure there was a lot of talk in prior years that he wasn't the pure point guard we needed, but this year's record makes clear that even without a healthy PG, we're a winning team with a healthy GH.

DunkinDutchman · Post #7 » by **DunkinDutchman** » Thu Mar 5, 2015 4:11 pm

We have no interest in either player for anyone on our roster worth what you are asking for.

mikepacernation · Post #8 » by **mikepacernation** » Fri Mar 6, 2015 1:08 am

Don't mean to be rude but I would feel to bad trading G hill to the Knicks.. I wouldn't want his career to be ruined. Really not trying to be rude

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Post #9 » by **Scoot McGroot** » Fri Mar 6, 2015 2:22 am

mikepacernation wrote:Don't mean to be rude but I would feel to bad trading G hill to the Knicks.. I wouldn't want his career to be ruined. Really not trying to be rude

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

That's pretty clearly rude. George Hill would do well wherever he goes. Let's not Make such broad, and incorrect, comments.