Orin wrote:But Lebron and Wade were very similar players in 11, so the question is, why did they chose to execute this strategy on Lebron James and not Wade?
I think a lot of the posts in this thread have been hitting on some good answers to this question so far. I like the notion that they knew James was always going to make the "right" play in the moment, even if it reduced the overall long-term payoff. IMO Wade has actually always been a tremendous off-ball player, and he got knocked unfairly for that during his peak years. His activity level was always really high, and he just had a knack for getting key OREBS, well-timed backdoor cuts, attacking off curls, etc.
But anyway, I think Dallas knew that LeBron wasn't willing to shoot Miami out of games, even if they were going to lose anyway. By forcing him to the top of the key and walling him off immediately inside the arc, they effectively cut his floor in half, forcing him to either take long J after long J (which he did to start game 6) or just pass to a teammate (which he did most of the series). LeBron also immediately lost confidence in the jumper when it stopped falling, and would go entirely passive for huge stretches when this happened.
And I'm not trying to downplay Wade, but even in 2011 it should've been clear LeBron was a better player. I think from this perspective choosing to focus on Wade was a good strategy, even though Wade was a superstar in his own right. Miami was always a pick your poison team that season, but Dallas found the antidote for one and the rest of the team was so thin they could survive the other. Wade definitely wasn't guarded off-ball the same way James was, and as a result he could get good post-up position when he wanted. He saw plenty of hard help when he attacked, but nothing too brutal. He was definitely the best player in this series IMO.
But I'd like to hear your thoughts on this as well. BTW- welcome to the board, and excellent first post.