cgf wrote:When you spend 90 minutes up a man, conceding a couple on set pieces should have no baring on the result. Chelsea lost because they didn't bury after ibra was sent off. Them letting PSG control the match in the second half of regulation and playing lackadaisically is why those set pieces even mattered.
You are implying that a team which spends 90 of 120 minutes a man up in any match ought to score a minimum of three goals. That is absurd.
In any case, Chelsea lost - literally - because they couldn't defend set pieces. Set piece conversion has zilch to do with the flow of a match (or whether one team is a man down), which is why they are so important to teams that struggle to create chances.
Chelsea had a poor game offensively (Even though they spent 34% of the match in the opponent's third). They never had a dominant, creative stretch and they couldn't find the openings on the counter that they are accustomed to. PSG is to be credited for much of that. But they were also not exactly troubled defensively and gave up one chance in open play all game. If it weren't for a highly improbable two set piece goals conceded in one match, this would have gone down as your classic uninspiring but professional Mourinho CL victory.