Context wrote:Brybeck01 wrote:Context wrote:
Can I ever just be myself on a forum without someone being "offended" by the small things?? Seriously...
Bry, speak for yourself bro... What I said was true. I have done the long write -up and guess what? Guy's still rationalize in their teams favor.
I don't think it's "my work". When you agreed to be a judge you accepted that responsibility as far as I'm concerned. I know I have. Any player that I don't recognize or are UNFAMILIAR with their current level of "play". I will research...
We are talking about a game. I have to write a disclaimer so posters aren't a "tad offended"? Come on bro... This is really annoying to be honest with you...
People need to think more positively and give people the benefit of the doubt regarding "intention" instead of always seeing negative colors through their negative lenses...
offended probably wasn't the right word. put off by your request that we all research your players is probably a better way to put it. That said, its just a game. And it was just a suggestion. Much like your request for other GMs to research your players was just a suggestion you made.
You are right that some GMs may have taken a closer look at players as they were picked. Other may have not. You don't have to do a full write up. A good # of GMs may not do one at all. Luckily the bulls board naturally produces more knowledgable fans, so research may not be needed. I know I'm not gonna do any extra work with your roster then what I'd done as the draft was going on.
Not trying to get you riled up friend. I'll steer clear of offering my thoughts on how you present your team. you do you. I'll do me.
you didnt "suggest" alone... you made a couple of comments that inferred things other than suggestion bro...For example, when you mention "then asking us to do your work for you"
that was unnecessary...
okay
best of luck in the playoffs bro
ah well my team tanked, higher lotto pick for me! 
