Braggins wrote:Eh, it doesn't get any more reputable than Julio Cesar Chavez. Pernell dominated him, although he technically got screwed and was awarded a draw. He had a controversial decision loss to an undefeated 24 year old Oscar De La Hoya that was steamrolling through multiple divisions like Manny did back in the day . He put on a defensive display in that fight.
Floyd is a little bigger and stronger, but probably not as quick or as good defensively. Floyd seems like he might have a little more punching power. They are pretty comparable. Whitaker lost motivation and fell off a cliff after the De la Hoya fight and retired early. He was insanely good in his mid to late 20s though. I think he might have been a little better at his peak but he didn't have a super long run as a top fighter like Floyd.
I wouldn't say that Pernell dominated Chavez. It was a almost even fight in my eyes where Chavez had the bigger name and legend so he got a slight benefit. Sure Pernell shoulda won by split decision tho if all things were fair. The problem with Pernell and why he couldn't beat these high profiled Mexicans the way Floyd has despite great defense is that he wasn't as accurate of a puncher as Floyd.



























