AFM wrote:payitforward wrote:You undervalue Batum and Leonard. And McCollum is worth more than Webster (that's obvious to me). But I can't see the trade in any case. Aldridge and Lopez both expire this year; they're not trading Leonard.
A trade that includes Nene would be great, but the original suggestion above is... ridiculous. Would be great for us of course.
We could have drafted Batum. Hell, we probably could have traded down w/ Portland in the '12 draft and picked Lillard and Leonard!
The best way to get good young players is to draft them.
I've thought Batum has been overrated on this board (actually mostly on bulletsforever, if you post there) for a few years now. His PER of 12 doesn't impress me, neither does his 30% from 3.
You're right, the best way to get good young players is to draft them. Also, pretty important that you don't trade said young players 2 years after doing so.
Agreed -- I'm not interested in trading Beal and/or Porter.
Batum is having a little bit of an off year; his PER has hovered around 16+ over the years. However, PER is not how to evaluate him (or anyone), as it significantly over-values points scored at any level of efficiency, and Batum is not a scorer.
If you look instead at his WP48, he's one of the top dozen SFs in the league.
Note: WP48 is a tool, that's all; it's not a religion, and I'm not a "believer." Not interested in debating it, as the debates go nowhere. The argument in favor of this tool is that it correlates at a high level w/ actual team wins/losses -- i.e. at a higher level than PER or any other published analytical tool: 94% is what's claimed.





















