RunDogGun wrote:JTrain wrote:RunDogGun wrote:Have you seen either? I have pictures of me and Steve Nash, can I claim he knows me?
How much smoke do you need to see before you assume there's a fire?
The police told the Republic that they are in possession of evidence that disputes the twins' claims.
Why do I need to "assume" anything? I'd rather not assume what happened, I'll leave that to the non-fans.
Because unless you were actually there, you will have to take someone's word for it, whether it's the news, the police report, the witnesses, etc.
I don't know 100% that there was a wreck on the interstate by my house today. The news said there was. The police said there was. Several witnesses said there was. But I'll never prove it 100%. I'll have to live in the real world and take the best evidence available, even if it means only ever reaching 99.99% certainty.
I believe there's enough evidence on the table to say that, while obviously not yet 99.99%, we have crossed the threshold of reasonable internet discussion doubt.