Liver_Pooty wrote:Unlike Hairston Green actually shot the deep ball well in college.
Green shot 29% from three his sophomore year at UNC. PJ shot 39% on like triple the attempts.
You're reaching.
Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop
Liver_Pooty wrote:Unlike Hairston Green actually shot the deep ball well in college.
yosemiteben wrote:Liver_Pooty wrote:Unlike Hairston Green actually shot the deep ball well in college.
Green shot 29% from three his sophomore year at UNC. PJ shot 39% on like triple the attempts.
You're reaching.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Liver_Pooty wrote:I''ve seen you say posters compare him to Harden. If you can find that post I need a new sig. That's just stupid
Liver_Pooty wrote:yosemiteben wrote:Liver_Pooty wrote:Unlike Hairston Green actually shot the deep ball well in college.
Green shot 29% from three his sophomore year at UNC. PJ shot 39% on like triple the attempts.
You're reaching.
Was referring to Green shooting 42% his senior year when he hit his stride. So I'm not reaching at all.
catch20two wrote:Liver_Pooty wrote:I''ve seen you say posters compare him to Harden. If you can find that post I need a new sig. That's just stupid
The Hairston thread was originally called Harden without the beard at first. Lol. I'll try to find and bump the arguments I had with people about his NBA comps that were ridiculous if I can find them.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Liver_Pooty wrote:May as well compare MKG to Lebron
yosemiteben wrote:Liver_Pooty wrote:yosemiteben wrote:Green shot 29% from three his sophomore year at UNC. PJ shot 39% on like triple the attempts.
You're reaching.
Was referring to Green shooting 42% his senior year when he hit his stride. So I'm not reaching at all.
So PJ was a poor shooter in college because he shot 39% from three his sophomore year, but Green shot well because he shot 42% after he had two more years of experience with not really close to the same number of attempts?
Green shot 27% from three his rookie year, for those curious.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
catch20two wrote:Liver_Pooty wrote:May as well compare MKG to Lebron
That actually happened too.
catch20two wrote:Liver_Pooty wrote:May as well compare MKG to Lebron
That actually happened too.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
BizGilwalker wrote:catch20two wrote:Liver_Pooty wrote:May as well compare MKG to Lebron
That actually happened too.
LeBron and MKG are the only 19-year-old non-big men to record 25/12 twice, or something like that
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Sik Infant wrote:Why should we have to trade one or more of MKG/Zeller/Vonleh or let Biz walk to get a SG who suits Kemba's "skillset"?
Sik Infant wrote:Kemba is going into his fifth season next year and he has peaked imo, people say he's young but in athlete terms 26 is closer to the end than the beginning.
Also I don't believe Kemba will age well, with his game in the present NBA.
Braggins wrote:Sik Infant wrote:Why should we have to trade one or more of MKG/Zeller/Vonleh or let Biz walk to get a SG who suits Kemba's "skillset"?
We don't? Who is saying we should trade MKG/Zeller/Vonleh to find a player to suite Kemba? SG is our biggest positional weakness regardless and we need shooting regardless. I don't know why you think we either have to trade Kemba or trade MKG/some other prospect...Sik Infant wrote:Kemba is going into his fifth season next year and he has peaked imo, people say he's young but in athlete terms 26 is closer to the end than the beginning.
Also I don't believe Kemba will age well, with his game in the present NBA.
Kyle Lowry averaged 9, 2, 4.5, on 39% shooting (27% from deep) in his 4th season. It isn't uncommon for PG's that aren't natural floor leaders to take longer to develop because they have to learn the intricacies of the PG position. If you just look at Kemba's skillset, I don't know how you can think he absolutely doesn't have the talent to improve. You are acting like the people who were convinced that MKG could never ever learn to shoot respectably.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
JDR720 wrote:The difference between Kemba and other PG's like Lawson, Holiday, Knight etc. isn't worth trading for, its just a marginal improvement IMO.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Sik Infant wrote:Braggins wrote:Sik Infant wrote:Why should we have to trade one or more of MKG/Zeller/Vonleh or let Biz walk to get a SG who suits Kemba's "skillset"?
We don't? Who is saying we should trade MKG/Zeller/Vonleh to find a player to suite Kemba? SG is our biggest positional weakness regardless and we need shooting regardless. I don't know why you think we either have to trade Kemba or trade MKG/some other prospect...Sik Infant wrote:Kemba is going into his fifth season next year and he has peaked imo, people say he's young but in athlete terms 26 is closer to the end than the beginning.
Also I don't believe Kemba will age well, with his game in the present NBA.
Kyle Lowry averaged 9, 2, 4.5, on 39% shooting (27% from deep) in his 4th season. It isn't uncommon for PG's that aren't natural floor leaders to take longer to develop because they have to learn the intricacies of the PG position. If you just look at Kemba's skillset, I don't know how you can think he absolutely doesn't have the talent to improve. You are acting like the people who were convinced that MKG could never ever learn to shoot respectably.
Who is going to hand us talent at the weakest position in the league for anything outside of MKG/Zeller/Vonleh?
If we don't let Biz walk and al and Hendo opt in, where do we find any cap space to sign a SG?
Yes spacing is our weakness (obviously) but Kemba who shoots 5-3PA a game for 31 percent from deep is a huge part of that problem.
Any SG we could draft at #9 like Oubre will probably be ready to produce when Kemba is 28/29 and heading for a new contract...
His deal (even with the new cap coming) is still overpaid for a guy who is a chucker who can't even shoot 40 percent.
In regards to MKG, I always knew he would learn how to shoot (been called a homer for it to) and there is a massive difference between 19/20 year old MKG improving his game and 25/26 year old Kemba improving his.
What exactly is Kemba's skillset by the way?
Please enlighten me on what exactly Kemba does do, that shows he has upside left in him?
Sik Infant wrote:Also in regards to Lowry, he needed the opportunity, no one can claim we haven't given Kemba opportunities to show us what he's got.
Liver_Pooty wrote:Can someone tell me one thing Walker is good to elite at?
Braggins wrote:Sik Infant wrote:Braggins wrote:We don't? Who is saying we should trade MKG/Zeller/Vonleh to find a player to suite Kemba? SG is our biggest positional weakness regardless and we need shooting regardless. I don't know why you think we either have to trade Kemba or trade MKG/some other prospect...
Kyle Lowry averaged 9, 2, 4.5, on 39% shooting (27% from deep) in his 4th season. It isn't uncommon for PG's that aren't natural floor leaders to take longer to develop because they have to learn the intricacies of the PG position. If you just look at Kemba's skillset, I don't know how you can think he absolutely doesn't have the talent to improve. You are acting like the people who were convinced that MKG could never ever learn to shoot respectably.
Who is going to hand us talent at the weakest position in the league for anything outside of MKG/Zeller/Vonleh?
If we don't let Biz walk and al and Hendo opt in, where do we find any cap space to sign a SG?
Yes spacing is our weakness (obviously) but Kemba who shoots 5-3PA a game for 31 percent from deep is a huge part of that problem.
Any SG we could draft at #9 like Oubre will probably be ready to produce when Kemba is 28/29 and heading for a new contract...
His deal (even with the new cap coming) is still overpaid for a guy who is a chucker who can't even shoot 40 percent.
In regards to MKG, I always knew he would learn how to shoot (been called a homer for it to) and there is a massive difference between 19/20 year old MKG improving his game and 25/26 year old Kemba improving his.
What exactly is Kemba's skillset by the way?
Please enlighten me on what exactly Kemba does do, that shows he has upside left in him?
We aren't contending next season even if we trade Kemba. We don't necessarily have to fix the SG position by next season. If Al opts in we are likely going to suck again regardless and if he opts out we will have plenty of cap room to sign a SG. We will have tons of cap in 2016 either way.
Oubre is the least NBA ready of any wing prospect in our range. Hezonja could easily be productive in a year or two. Trading
Al/Lance is also a possibility.
Kemba's deal isn't the albatross you seem to be making it out to be. 12 million a year is basically 3rd option money given the cap increase that is going to occur in the next two years. He is not going to limit our ability to sign free agents or resign any of our young guys.
Also, Kemba turned 24 like 3 months ago and you've literally been talking about him like he is 25-26 the last couple pages. I know I am a clueless homer for pointing that out, like when I pointed out that he wasn't 5'10, but it is true. I'm sorry.
As far as Kemba's upside, he is one of the absolute quickest and fastest players in the league and one of the best ball handlers. He has been an above average defender (not this year admittedly, but the ability is still there) and rebounder for his position. He has great intangibles and work ethic. His playmaking isn 't great but it isn't the disaster you make it out to be. He has shown some potential in that regard. He averaged well over 7 assists after the all-star break last season. He'll never be great in that regard, but he can be competent, which is really all you need. For example, he averages about the same amount of assists as Tony Parker, He has his flaws. He has plenty of things he needs to improve. That doesn't mean he isn't capable of being a good player.
Braggins wrote:Liver_Pooty wrote:Can someone tell me one thing Walker is good to elite at?
Really, you can't think of one thing he is good at?
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.