AFM wrote:I call him Baby KD, Lil Durant.
Yeah, sort of a combination of Michael Jordan and Wilt Chamberlain - except better.
There's no lightning in the weather forecast, is there?
Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

AFM wrote:I call him Baby KD, Lil Durant.
Code: Select all
Season Age WS/48 VORP ORtg DRtg
2013-14 20 -0.006 -0.4 86 107
2014-15 21 0.090 0.4 104 104
2015-16 22 0.174 1.4 122 101
Illmatic12 wrote:dobrojim wrote:Watching Memphis tonight reminds me of another nice case scenario of what OP might become someday
and that's his fellow G'town alum Jeff Green. I don't know that that would be a bad thing.
I don't see it, Green isn't a hustle guy and doesn't do much when the ball isn't in his hands.
Ruzious wrote:fishercob wrote:Ruzious wrote:I'd call him a mix between a taller Danny Green (though Green's a better ball-handler) and a slightly smaller Prince. He made 33.7% of his 3's - which is almost certainly going to improve with hard work, experience, and regular playing time. Of course, it'd help if he had the shooting coach Green and Leonard had.
Is he in fact any smaller than Prince? They're both listed at 6'9.
Totally agree that his shooting his key. The huge improvements he made in college give me hope.
As skinny as Prince has always looked, he actually weighed in at 225 as a rookie out of Kentucky. Maybe it's in the legs. Prince looks at least an inch taller than Porter.
dobrojim wrote:Illmatic12 wrote:dobrojim wrote:Watching Memphis tonight reminds me of another nice case scenario of what OP might become someday
and that's his fellow G'town alum Jeff Green. I don't know that that would be a bad thing.
I don't see it, Green isn't a hustle guy and doesn't do much when the ball isn't in his hands.
You're right. Their actual games are not necessarily that similar. I inelegantly was referring
more to the value or quality of his play. Green was also a high pick #5, from G'town, who has
been moved around in some high profile trades. One could reasonably ask why teams would
trade him away but looked at from the other side, look at what the trading team got in exchange.
Not that I am advocating trading OP right now except in the way some people will say everything
I own is for sale (for a sufficiently high price).
Ruzious wrote:AFM wrote:I call him Baby KD, Lil Durant.
Yeah, sort of a combination of Michael Jordan and Wilt Chamberlain - except better.
There's no lightning in the weather forecast, is there?

AFM wrote:Ruzious wrote:AFM wrote:I call him Baby KD, Lil Durant.
Yeah, sort of a combination of Michael Jordan and Wilt Chamberlain - except better.
There's no lightning in the weather forecast, is there?
I don't get the Wilt Chamberlain or MJ comparison.
Now if you had said, pre Houston TMac, combined with the offensive rebounding of Ben Wallace, then sure.
tontoz wrote:I am certainly glad Porter has been getting big minutes but at the same time i am confused by it. It wasn't that long ago that Wittman got pissed when someone asked him why Porter wasn't playing more. Even Wall was saying to ask Witt about it when he was asked about Porters playing time.
I am curious to know why Witt suddenly decided to nearly double his minutes, in the playoffs no less.
tontoz wrote:I am certainly glad Porter has been getting big minutes but at the same time i am confused by it. It wasn't that long ago that Wittman got pissed when someone asked him why Porter wasn't playing more. Even Wall was saying to ask Witt about it when he was asked about Porters playing time.
I am curious to know why Witt suddenly decided to nearly double his minutes, in the playoffs no less.
tontoz wrote:I am certainly glad Porter has been getting big minutes but at the same time i am confused by it. It wasn't that long ago that Wittman got pissed when someone asked him why Porter wasn't playing more. Even Wall was saying to ask Witt about it when he was asked about Porters playing time.
I am curious to know why Witt suddenly decided to nearly double his minutes, in the playoffs no less.
TheSecretWeapon wrote:Just saw that Wittman said he was "a little bit" playing possum not using Pierce at PF during the regular season. Said he wanted to keep him fresh for the playoffs and didn't want to run his minutes to 35+ per night. Part of that answer -- the part about keeping Pierce fresh -- makes sense. The rest of it makes no sense at all. He could have kept Pierce at 26-28 minutes with some of those minutes coming at PF.

tontoz wrote:I am certainly glad Porter has been getting big minutes but at the same time i am confused by it. It wasn't that long ago that Wittman got pissed when someone asked him why Porter wasn't playing more. Even Wall was saying to ask Witt about it when he was asked about Porters playing time.
I am curious to know why Witt suddenly decided to nearly double his minutes, in the playoffs no less.
Ruzious wrote:tontoz wrote:I am certainly glad Porter has been getting big minutes but at the same time i am confused by it. It wasn't that long ago that Wittman got pissed when someone asked him why Porter wasn't playing more. Even Wall was saying to ask Witt about it when he was asked about Porters playing time.
I am curious to know why Witt suddenly decided to nearly double his minutes, in the playoffs no less.
Wittman addressed half this issue after game 1. He said Pierce came to him about playing some PF - and Wittman said something like "I'd be a fool to not listen to a Hall of Famer, so I tried it out." Of course, he could have used one of the veterans at the 3, but... maybe someone in the front office who reads this board had a talk with him.
tontoz wrote:He is a master at ignoring the obvious (see Wall still running end of quarter isos).