amcoolio wrote:-Ian- wrote:Liver_Pooty wrote:Lol. Could Bonnell have asked any easier questions? Holy ****. Ask him about Clifford, Cho, anything. May as well ask him what his favorite freaking color is.
Seriously. Where can we petition to have Bonnell replaced as the Hornets beat writer for the Observer? I kinda want Fowler.
Fatlever is more than qualified. Lamar too if he can get a house over here.
We need a beat writer connected with the hardcore fans and Zach Lowe.
Bonnell has put in a lot of work over the years but he sticks to very old school beat writing in an age where journalism is rapidly evolving. He's also afraid of getting his credentials revoked by asking tough questions or being critical of the team
Yeah, he might have succeeded in the late 70s when he could have flown with the same connected flights as the players and join them for dinner and whatnot. Otherwise, his plain questions don't seem to cut it.
In a way, I believe that he might be thinking that he's doing what a beat reporter is supposed to do. The thing is that he doesn't separate the valuable information from the bull that coaches will give you just because you are the media.
If Clifford tells him that we lost the rebounding battle or that player X had to be benched because of his energy level (typical coaching lingo), Bonnell will bang that point home and won't question it. From there on it will be the truth to him because that's what Clifford told him. Then we'll hear a few months in a row from him that Vonleh isn't ready to play (because that's what Clifford said).
Perhaps, in the 70s when relationships between the media and the team were different and you would grab beers with them and share everything, a coach Clifford would tell him a lot more. Nowadays, he can just shrug his questions off and manipulate the material that will be publicised.