The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
- Kanyewest
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,346
- And1: 2,721
- Joined: Jul 05, 2004
Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
Sessions isn't going to be a great starter but he can play well in bursts. He did have 7 points in the 1st quarter. Problem though is that he had only one point for the rest of the game. At least one of his shots was a half court heave in the first quarter.
Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
- TGW
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,336
- And1: 6,705
- Joined: Oct 22, 2010
Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
This guy stinks.
The revolving door of horrible backup point guards continue.
The revolving door of horrible backup point guards continue.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
- Chocolate City Jordanaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 54,529
- And1: 10,296
- Joined: Aug 05, 2001
-
Check the team stats in the Atlanta series of the Wizards in games Sessions started.
Washington went 1-2 with both Wall (injured) and Sessions. Check the team game logs and tell me the losses were on Sessions.
I think Sessions did reasonably well against Atlanta. The Wizards needed Clarkson for sure, but I can't fault Sessions' effort.
Washington went 1-2 with both Wall (injured) and Sessions. Check the team game logs and tell me the losses were on Sessions.
I think Sessions did reasonably well against Atlanta. The Wizards needed Clarkson for sure, but I can't fault Sessions' effort.
Re:
- TGW
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,336
- And1: 6,705
- Joined: Oct 22, 2010
Re:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Check the team stats in the Atlanta series of the Wizards in games Sessions started.
Washington went 1-2 with both Wall (injured) and Sessions. Check the team game logs and tell me the losses were on Sessions.
I think Sessions did reasonably well against Atlanta. The Wizards needed Clarkson for sure, but I can't fault Sessions' effort.
8 points and 2 assists on 34% shooting isn't reasonably well...it's awful. He was 8-33 in his last 4 games.
And no the losses aren't on Sessions...no one said that. He isn't important nor good enough to hang a loss on him. His job is to provide good backup play and he didn't. He also didn't step up at all.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,298
- And1: 2,440
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
- Location: on a rock
-
Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
Sessions wasn't great but I thought he did all that he could have done given the talent he was up against.
Now trying to insinuate the team is better without Wall is flat out stupid. Watch the games, players missed a lot of CLEAN OPEN looks Wall created for them. Its not Wall's fault the team shot cold in this game (from distance). Game 5 was a stinker for everyone so kinda have to take it with a grain of salt.
Also, I still think game 3 was a fluke, ATL coasted in that game and it costed them. Who the hell gets hype and engaged to take on Ramon Sessions?
Now trying to insinuate the team is better without Wall is flat out stupid. Watch the games, players missed a lot of CLEAN OPEN looks Wall created for them. Its not Wall's fault the team shot cold in this game (from distance). Game 5 was a stinker for everyone so kinda have to take it with a grain of salt.
Also, I still think game 3 was a fluke, ATL coasted in that game and it costed them. Who the hell gets hype and engaged to take on Ramon Sessions?
- Chocolate City Jordanaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 54,529
- And1: 10,296
- Joined: Aug 05, 2001
-
The last two games without Wall they scored over 100 points. ..but they gave up over 100.
The last two with INJURED Wall they scored 81 and 91 points. ..and only gave up four more.
My only point is Sessions didn't cost games. Neither did Wall.
The Wizards got beat by Horford, Millsap, and Carroll collectively.
The last two with INJURED Wall they scored 81 and 91 points. ..and only gave up four more.
My only point is Sessions didn't cost games. Neither did Wall.
The Wizards got beat by Horford, Millsap, and Carroll collectively.
Re: Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
- Chocolate City Jordanaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 54,529
- And1: 10,296
- Joined: Aug 05, 2001
-
Re: Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
nuposse04 wrote:Sessions wasn't great but I thought he did all that he could have done given the talent he was up against.
Now trying to insinuate the team is better without Wall is flat out stupid. Watch the games, players missed a lot of CLEAN OPEN looks Wall created for them. Its not Wall's fault the team shot cold in this game (from distance). Game 5 was a stinker for everyone so kinda have to take it with a grain of salt.
Also, I still think game 3 was a fluke, ATL coasted in that game and it costed them. Who the hell gets hype and engaged to take on Ramon Sessions?
We stole game one when they were tired.
The better team won.
Beal really stepped up. Porter did, too. Wall played hurt and competed as hard as humanely possible.
I'm upset but there are many positive to take from the loss. I don't think singling out Sessions is really necessary. The guy did all could be expected.
Too bad there is not going to be a game 7.
Re: Re: Re:
- Chocolate City Jordanaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 54,529
- And1: 10,296
- Joined: Aug 05, 2001
-
Re: Re: Re:
TGW wrote:Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Check the team stats in the Atlanta series of the Wizards in games Sessions started.
Washington went 1-2 with both Wall (injured) and Sessions. Check the team game logs and tell me the losses were on Sessions.
I think Sessions did reasonably well against Atlanta. The Wizards needed Clarkson for sure, but I can't fault Sessions' effort.
8 points and 2 assists on 34% shooting isn't reasonably well...it's awful. He was 8-33 in his last 4 games.
And no the losses aren't on Sessions...no one said that. He isn't important nor good enough to hang a loss on him. His job is to provide good backup play and he didn't. He also didn't step up at all.
Washington probably drafts a PG.
I like Tokoto a lot in round 2. I like Joe Young. I like Olivier Hanlan.
I'm not sure I'd burn a first round pick on Tyus Jones, Delon Wright, or Jerian Grant.
I'm okay with Grant as the pick ... if no stud slips in the draft.
I would LOVE to see Cameron Payne be the Wizards pick.
The best case would be to get Kris Dunn in round two.
YES, TGW, the Wizards need a better backup PG.
Re: Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,298
- And1: 2,440
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
- Location: on a rock
-
Re: Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:nuposse04 wrote:Sessions wasn't great but I thought he did all that he could have done given the talent he was up against.
Now trying to insinuate the team is better without Wall is flat out stupid. Watch the games, players missed a lot of CLEAN OPEN looks Wall created for them. Its not Wall's fault the team shot cold in this game (from distance). Game 5 was a stinker for everyone so kinda have to take it with a grain of salt.
Also, I still think game 3 was a fluke, ATL coasted in that game and it costed them. Who the hell gets hype and engaged to take on Ramon Sessions?
We stole game one when they were tired.
The better team won.
Beal really stepped up. Porter did, too. Wall played hurt and competed as hard as humanely possible.
I'm upset but there are many positive to take from the loss. I don't think singling out Sessions is really necessary. The guy did all could be expected.
Too bad there is not going to be a game 7.
I'm not sure game 1 was a tired thing. I think Budz adjusted as the series went on. I think Budz had Randy figured out by game 4. By that point it probably wouldn't have mattered if we had Wall or not. The better team won the series, but we were competitive because of our future...which is a good thing. I just don't think blame can be attributed anywhere but our bigs and possibly our bench. I thought Wall, Beal and Porter did all they could do given the circumstances (especially Wall and Beal).
I think Randy did better overall in these playoffs but he still is kinda stubborn and unimaginative. But out lack of quality stretch bigs kills us, that and we don't really have defensive anchors, I guess you could say a healthy Gortat is one, but when he is puking and ****...well ironically you get the same quality of play after him in terms of the depth chart.
Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
-
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 14,799
- And1: 7,925
- Joined: Feb 25, 2009
Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
Might be needing this
Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,295
- And1: 16,462
- Joined: May 01, 2014
-
Re: The Incredibly Sucky Ramon Sessions Thread
montestewart wrote:Might be needing this
Just read the thread...hillarious...some of the proununcements about draft picks and the hate for Ramon were a breath of fresh air...
Reading the old post from posters I know are simply the best. Growth - regressions - etc..
Anyway thanks for bumping this.