Ruzious wrote:nuposse04 wrote:Ruzious wrote:Gotta go BPA, imo - particularly when the talent gap is wide. I agree on Lyles - I don't want a poor man's Juwan Howard. Here's a nice update on Upshaw. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2466 ... -wild-card It says the Wiz were one of several teams to interview him.
I didn't follow college ball as well as most this season, and while his numbers look ok to me at a glance, he played on what I thought was a stacked team, and seems physically deficient at the next level. Now...if I'm wrong about any of these assumptions, I'm willing to read some reasons why, but I honestly just don't see how he is:
1. Actually the BPA at 19
2. Someone who would really help this team
Upshaw intrigues me, but I wonder how much of a project he'll be. I'm also more in the favor of taking a project big in the 2nd round so long as we can secure a 4 or a 2 in the 1st round who has an off chance of being an impact player. Cause if he plan is to use Nene as a backup 5, I'm not sure how much minutes Upshaw would get, and I'd rather get minutes to develop if at all possible.
Why do you think Upshaw played on a stacked team? My recollection is they fell apart after he was kicked off the team, and the only other prospect on the team was the point guard - who's likely a future 2nd rounder. And how is he physically deficient? He measured as the biggest and longest player at the combine - with the biggest hands. He's not a speedster, but he runs the court as well as an average NBA center, and he's certainly agile enough. He can impact a game with his defense and showed good pick and roll skills when I watched him. Imo, there's no question about his physical abilities.
I think he was still referring to Tyus Jones - stacked team, underwhelming physical profile, and all that.
Of course, you could have said the former about another Dookie in Battier, and the latter about Steph Curry - maybe the both/and makes it tough to accept Jones as a top prospect?




















