I was suspended under the theory that I was insulting posters on the General Board. It was after the Delly/Horford thing and there was a lot of baiting going on. I did technically say some things that were insults but I've seen much worse, I've been on the receiving end of much worse (including from posters who were Mods), and the guy who suspended me was a Toronto Raptors forum Mod. I wasn't even posting on the Raptors forum.
B Mac, is this really how it works? Is there a review from all the mods or if you piss of the wrong guy on the wrong day, that's it.
Who has authority to suspend and is the criteria objective?
Moderator: ijspeelman
Who has authority to suspend and is the criteria objective?
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,821
- And1: 35,908
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Who has authority to suspend and is the criteria objective?
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Who has authority to suspend and is the criteria objective?
-
gflem
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,072
- And1: 281
- Joined: Sep 11, 2004
Re: Who has authority to suspend and is the criteria objective?
And here I thought this was about Horford trying to elbow slam Delly's head and not getting a game while JR flails (without looking) at Crowder and gets two games. Then again, maybe it is the same person in both cases!
Re: Who has authority to suspend and is the criteria objective?
-
B Mac
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 11,733
- And1: 540
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
- Location: North Canton, Ohio
- Contact:
-
Re: Who has authority to suspend and is the criteria objective?
Feel free to PM me. Going to lock this to avoid any further problems.