AQuintus wrote:sfernald wrote:The problem I have with comparing some of these stats is strength of schedule.
Duke was 65th (62.1) in strength of schedule and Kentucky was 78th (59.8). The gap is very small.Many of their games were like the trotters playing against the Washington generals. If you watched their games, how many 20-4 blowouts did you see from the outset?
This wasn't because their opponents were bad. This was because Kentucky was very, very good this year, and they were very, very good this year due to having great players like Towns.it was hard to get too excited about Towns' defense when he was playing against 6'5" and 6''6" centers.
I actually looked into this. Towns played just as many games against teams with starters with NBA size (6'9"+ and 240+ pounds) as Okafor (20).
Are you going by ESPN SoS? Cause that's not necessarily definitive. And it seems like they make it pretty complex by basing it on BPI. You can find all sorts of different calculations on the Internet. Here's one that shows Duke as #3 in SoS and Kentucky as #17:
http://warrennolan.com/basketball/2015/sos
In my eye test if you don't count the NCAA tournament, Kentucky schedule was pretty much: generals, generals, generals, and more generals. Lol
Also, if an opponent was fortunate to have one 6'9" player, who would guard him on Kentucky? Wouldn't you put the defensive WCS on him and let Towns guard the next guy who's probably the 6'6" dude? That's the thing about Kentucky's crazy roster. Even if towns didn't play they would still blowout most teams on their schedule.
























