Saberestar wrote:I'm surprised that I haven't seen any mention of the Suns taking Looney at 13. He seems like the kind of upside pick that McDonough would like, especially with their need at backup PF and need for rebounding. Do you think he is too raw for where their team is at right now?
Chad FordProbably. Looney has enormous upside, but the learning curve scares teams right now. He hasn't quite figured out what he is. And it could take time. Not sure the Suns will have that sort of patience. Especially with players like Kaminsky, Devin Booker, Bobby Portis that could help right now.
http://m.espn.go.com/general/chat/chat? ... nd=ref~%7B"ref"%3A"http%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2Fz5xa8prWg2"%7D
I don't post much and I'm mostly a lurker, but I wanted to jump in this conversation since I sent this question to Chad Ford. I'm a little biased since I'm a UCLA fan, but I think Looney would be a great pick at 13. If the Suns don't do it, I understand why, though. I have come around a little on Kaminsky lately. I didn't think he was a great shooter, but he lit it up in workouts recently. It's interesting to note, though, that even though Kaminsky is 3.5" taller than Looney, Looney still has a higher standing reach by .5" because of his long arms (7' 3.5" wingspan) and the fact that Kaminsky is a t-rex.
At this point, I'd vote for Looney, Kaminsky, and Turner, probably in that order. But there's not a big gap between those 3 and I would be happy with any of them.
























